Saturday, February 11, 2017

Reflections On Coretta Scott King, Elizabeth Warren, Jeff Sessions and Consciousness of a Larger Picture

As my therapist reflected to me this week, it is painful to be conscious in the face of so much suffering. Deeply painful. One of my ways of coping is to again and again illuminate the injustice, oppression, and violence perpetrated by those who cannot see this suffering - AND to illuminate that another world is possible, one which holds deep caring and consciousness of the interconnection we share with all humans, all species, and Mother Earth. When we are able to see with our hearts, the suffering of others becomes our suffering.

Right now we have a president who suffers from severe Narcissistic Personality Disorder. This mental illness means that he is incapable of seeing others as anything other than an extension of himself who are there to serve him. This self-absorption and the profound walling up of his heart makes it impossible for Mr. Trump to see the suffering and pain of others. It is important to recognize this - that he is incapable of compassion and empathy. Because of his Narcissistic Personality Disorder, anyone who does not reflect back to him the distorted reality that he lives in is to be demonized, denigrated, destroyed. These inner walls of Mr. Trump can be seen as the walls he is compelled to project outward and try to forcibly build between nations, between religions, between races, and between the countless human beings who are tragic victims of this violence.

Those who are on a path of awakening and who hold the capacity and vision of being able to increasingly see with the wholeness of their hearts and minds and souls are experienced as extreme threats to those who in positions of great power who are unconscious. Thus, those such as Coretta Scott King and Elizabeth Warren are shut down. And in our patriarchal culture, this is especially true because they are strong and courageous women who have stood up powerfully and with great courage and integrity against injustice, poverty, racism, and the many faces of violence in our world. It is also vital to notice that while the words of Coretta Scott King were allowed in 1986, they were crushed today - but only when read by a strong woman. The "good old boys" went on to allow these same words to be read by other men after they silenced Elizabeth Warren. Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Tom Udall, Senator Sherrod Brown, and Senator Jeff Merkley were all allowed to read the words of Coretta Scott King.

I share this today because our current president has chosen to surround himself with those who are unable to see the suffering of others. Millions are aware that the larger picture is much greater than Jeff Sessions alone - all of those who Mr. Trump is drawn to put in positions of power are experienced by him as reflections of himself and mirrors of his deeply distorted reality. It cannot be stressed enough how exceptionally dangerous this is to us all - not just to all of us here in America, but to all life on this planet. To the degree that we are asleep and experience ourselves as separate from the web of life is the degree that we humans will inevitably cause harm to ourselves and others. Therefore, it is absolutely vital to stand up to all those in positions of power who are incapable of seeing the suffering of other human beings and the planet. They are the most dangerous among us.

I am moved today to honor the courage and integrity of Coretta Scott King, Elizabeth Warren, and Senators Sanders, Udall, Brown, and Merkley. They model for us all how to stand strongly and passionately in deeper truths, in the consciousness of the great dangers in our midst, and in the urgency that we work together for a higher good for all. Blessed are all those who are rooted in the truth of the urgent need to illuminate that which poses such a great threat to all that is Sacred and who give voice to how it is that another world is possible.

Below is the statement made by Coretta Scott King that Elizabeth Warren was silenced attempting to read. I am inspired by these women! May courage and truth, caring and compassion, and an ever expanding consciousness be contagious!

People ask me what I am going to do when I retire in seven weeks. I respond that I am going to be a resisting, revolutionary, radical grandma! There is much work to be done. May we each individually and collectively do our part, whatever that may be, in working for a world that increasingly works for all. All the children and grandchildren and those not yet born are depending on us.

 Bless us all ~ Molly

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. 
- Martin Luther King, Jr.

Re: Nomination of Jefferson B. Sessions
U.S. Judge, southern/District of
Alabama Hearing, March 13, 1986

Dear Senator Thurmond:

I write to express my sincere opposition to the confirmation of Jefferson B. Sessions as a federal district court judge for the Southern District of Alabama. my professional and personal roots in Alabama are deep and lasting. Anyone who has used the power of his office as United States Attorney to intimidate and chill the free exercise of the ballot by citizens should not be elevated to our courts.

Mr. Sessions has used the awesome powers of his office in a shabby attempt to intimidate and frighten elderly black voters. For this reprehensible conduct, he should not be rewarded with a federal judgeship. I regret that a long-standing commitment prevents me from appearing in person to testify against this nominee. However, I have attached a copy of my statement opposing Mr. Sessions' confirmation and I request that my statement as well as this letter be made a part of the hearing record.

I do sincerely urge you to oppose the confirmation of Mr. Sessions.


Coretta Scott King

cc: The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
United States Senate
308 Senate Hart Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Statement of
Coretta Scott King
on the Nomination of
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III
for the
United states District Court
Southern District of Alabama

Senate Judiciary Committee
Thursday, March 13, 1986

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:

Thank you for allowing me this opportunity to express my strong opposition to the nomination of Jefferson Sessions for federal district judgeship for the Southern District of Alabama. My longstanding commitment which I shared with my husband, Martin, to protect and enhance the rights of Black Americans, rights which include equal access to the democratic process, compels me to testify today.

Civil rights leaders, including my husband and Albert Turner, have fought long and hard to achieve free and unfettered access to the ballot box. Mr. Sessions has used-the awesome power of his office to chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens in the district he now seeks to serve as a federal judge. This simply cannot be allowed to happen. Mr. Sessions' conduct as U.S. Attorney, from his politically-motivated voting fraud prosecutions to his indifference toward criminal violations of civil rights laws, indicates that he lacks the temperament, fairness and judgment to be a federal judge.

The Voting Rights Act was, and still is, vitally important to the future of democracy in the United States. I was privileged to join Martin and many others during the Selma to Montgomery march for voting rights in 1965. Martin was particularly impressed by the determination to get the franchise of blacks in Selma and neighboring Perry County. As he wrote, "Certainly no community in the history of the Negro struggle has responded with the enthusiasm of Selma and her neighboring town of Marion. Where Birmingham depended largely upon students and unemployed adults [to participate in non?violent protest of the denial of the franchise], Selma has involved fully 10 per cent of the Negro population in active demonstrations, and at least half the Negro population of Marion was arrested on one day. Martin was referring of course to a group that included the defendants recently prosecuted for assisting elderly and illiterate blacks to exercise that franchise. In fact, Martin anticipated from the depth of their commitment twenty years ago, that a united political organization would remain in Perry County long after the Other marchers had left. This organization, the Perry County Civic League, started by Mr. Turner, Mr. Hogue, and others, as Martin predicted, continued "to direct the drive for votes and other rights." In the years since the Voting Rights Act was passed, Black Americans in Marion, Selma and elsewhere have made important strides in their struggle to participate actively in the electoral process. The number of Blacks registered to vote in key Southern states has doubled since 1965. This would not have been possible without the Voting Rights Act.

However, Blacks still fall far short of having equal participation in the electoral process. Particularly in the South. efforts continue to be made to deny Blacks access to the polls, even where Blacks constitute the majority of the voters. It has been a long up?hill struggle to keep alive the vital legislation that protects the most fundamental right to vote. A person who has exhibited so much hostility to the enforcement of those laws, and thus, to the exercise of those rights by Black people should not be elevated to the federal bench.

The irony of Mr. Sessions' nomination is that, if confirmed, he will be given life tenure for doing with a federal prosecution what the local sheriffs accomplished twenty years ago with clubs and cattle prods. Twenty years ago, when we marched from Selma to Montgomery, the fear of voting was real, as the broken bones and bloody heads in Selma and Marion bore witness. As my husband wrote at the time, "it was net just a sick imagination that conjured up the vision of a public official. sworn to uphold the law, who forced an inhuman march upon hundreds of Negro children; who ordered the Rev. James Bevel to be chained to his sickbed; who clubbed a Negro woman registrant. and who callously inflicted repeated brutalities and indignities upon nonviolent Negroes peacefully petitioning for their constitutional right to vote."

Free exercise of voting rights is so fundamental to American democracy that we can not tolerate any form of infringement of those rights. Of all the groups who have been disenfranchised in our nation?s history, none has struggled longer or suffered more in the attempt to win the vote than Black citizens. No group has had access to the ballot box denied so persistently and intently. Over the past century, a broad array of schemes have been used in attempts to block the Black vote. The range of techniques developed with the purpose of repressing black voting rights run the gamut from the-straightforward application of brutality against black citizens who tried to vote to such legalized frauds as ?grandfather clause" exclusions and rigged literacy tests.

The actions taken by Mr. Sessions in regard to the 1984 voting fraud prosecutions represent just one more technique used to intimidate Black voters and thus deny them this most precious franchise. The investigations into the absentee voting process were conducted only in the Black Belt counties where blacks had finally achieved political power in the local government. Whites had been using the absentee process to their advantage for years, without incident. Then, when Blacks; realizing its strength, began to use it with success, criminal investigations were begun.

In these investigations, Mr. Sessions, as U.S. Attorney, exhibited an eagerness to bring to trial and convict three leaders of the Perry County Civic League including Albert Turner despite evidence clearly demonstrating their innocence of any wrongdoing. Furthermore, in initiating the case, Mr. Sessions ignored allegations of similar behavior by whites, choosing instead to chill the exercise of the franchise by blacks by his misguided investigation. In fact, Mr. Sessions sought to punish older black civil rights activists, advisers and colleagues of my husband, who had been key figures in the civil rights movement in the 1960's. These were persons who, realizing the potential of the absentee vote among Blacks, had learned to use the process within the bounds of legality and had taught others to do the same. The only sin they committed was being too successful in gaining votes.

The scope and character of the investigations conducted by Mr. Sessions also warrant grave concern. Witnesses were selectively chosen in accordance with the favorability of their testimony to the government's case. Also, the prosecution illegally withheld from the defense critical statements made by witnesses. Witnesses who did testify were pressured and intimidated into submitting the "correct" testimony. Many elderly blacks were visited multiple times by the FBI who then hauled them over 180 miles by bus to a grand jury in Mobile when they could more easily have testified at a grand jury twenty miles away in Selma. These voters, and others, have announced they are now never going to vote again.

I urge you to consider carefully Mr. Sessions' conduct in these matters. Such a review, I believe, raises serious questions about his commitment to the protection of the voting rights of all American citizens and consequently his fair and unbiased judgment regarding;this fundamental right. When the circumstances and facts surrounding the indictments of Al Turner, his wife, Evelyn, and Spencer Hogue are analyzed, it becomes clear that the motivation was political, and the result frightening the wide?scale chill of the exercise of the ballot for blacks, who suffered so much to receive that right in the first place. Therefore, it is my Strongly~held view that the appointment of Jefferson Sessions to the federal bench would irreparably damage the work of my husband, A1 Turner, and countless others who risked their lives and freedom over the past twenty years to ensure equal participation in our democratic system.

The exercise of the franchise is an essential means by which our citizens ensure that those who are governing will be responsible. My husband called it the number one civil right. The denial of access to the ballot box ultimately results in the denial of other fundamental rights. For, it is only when the poor and disadvantaged are empowered that they are able to participate actively in the solutions to their own problems.

We still have a long way to go before we can say that minorities no longer need be concerned about discrimination at the polls. Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans and Asian Americans are grossly underrepresented at every level of government in America. If we are going to make our timeless dream of justice through democracy a reality, we must take every possible step to ensure that the spirit and intent of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution is honored.
The federal courts hold a unique position in our constitutional system, ensuring that minorities and other citizens without political power have a forum in.which to vindicate their rights. Because of this unique role, it is essential that the people selected to be federal judges respect the basic tenets of our legal system respect for individual rights and a commitment to equal justice for all. The integrity of the Courts, and thus the rights they protect, can only be maintained if citizens feel confident that those selected as federal judges will be able to judge with fairness others holding differing views.
I do not believe Jefferson Sessions possesses the requisite judgment, competence, and sensitivity to the rights guaranteed by the federal civil rights laws to qualify for appointment to the federal district court. Based on his record, I believe his confirmation would have a devastating effect on not only the judicial system in Alabama, but also on the progress we have made everywhere toward fulfilling my husband's dream that he envisioned over twenty years ago. I therefore urge the Senate Judiciary Committee to deny his confirmation.

I thank you for allowing me to share my views."

No comments: