Monday, May 27, 2019

Joe Biden Is Not the Pragmatic Choice for 2020

This is a deeply important article. We will not break out of the unconscious and poisonous patterns of the status quo that have brought us to this point of multiple crises  Trump, endless war, racism and other "isms", crushing and increasing poverty, the extreme redistribution of wealth upwards, the takeover of our government and media by large corporate interests, the sixth major extinction and the ecological and climate crises, etc., etc. — without recognizing and working to intervene and stop the collusion and active participation found in both major political parties, and ourselves, and especially over the past 40 years. We will not be doing the urgent work of trying to ensure our children and all children everywhere the possibility of a habitable planet without first being brave enough to dive deep and lift the veils of our ignorance, indoctrination, and illusions. This requires, I believe, letting go of the attachment that our big battle is simply defined and confined to being between Democrats versus Republicans. NOT TRUE! Our struggle is to become aware of all that we have individually and collectively ingested that is harmful, to embrace a profound commitment to truth, to courageously explore and recognize ever expanding larger pictures, to again and again place principles before personalities, and to clearly define those principles. I believe that our great struggle is to recognize where we all on the continuum of brainwashing and to awaken from and transform deeply embedded cultural belief systems from those which in some way are rooted in violence and separation to radically different beliefs and values which actually hold all life with respect and reverence. The gift in shining light on all that causes so much suffering is that it opens a doorway which invites us to enter and surrender to a birthing of a New Story within ourselves, our nation, and the world. 

I hold nothing against Joe Biden personally. However, the principles and values I am committed to living by and deepen within myself — which are grounded in Do No Harm cause me to strongly oppose the record of this man and all who continue to endorse the status quo, moderation, and being "realists." This is code for neoliberalism — continuing to sell our souls to the interests of Wall Street, the fossil fuel industry, the military industrial complex, the insurance and pharmaceutical industries, the prison industrial complex, and other large and toxic neoliberal corporate interests. The bottom line is that this path that we have been on as a nation and as a planet is heading us off the cliff into extinction, and we are taking most of Earth's inhabitants with us. This is not the journey that we can sustain, not if we care about our country and about life on Earth. There is no returning to the "good old days," and as we bravely do the hard work of lifting those veils of our illusions and embracing the antidote of disillusionment, we then become open to the New Story that is trying to birth herself — in these deeply violent times, this is a radical story which truly and deeply cares for all life. The status quo simply must go. Another world is possible. — Molly


Behind Biden are all the elite forces who dream of retaining the status quo that preserves their profits
An insidious idea pervading media analysis and public discourse around the 2020 presidential election is that voters looking to defeat President Donald Trump are locked into an ideological battle between pragmatism and idealism. Voters backing former Vice President Joe Biden find him to be “electable” rather than being a candidate whose values they support. But is Biden really the pragmatic choice?

Before Biden announced he was running, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders appeared to be the front-runner, boosting hopes among those who supported him in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary. But a new poll found Biden garnering the highest “favorability rating” among the many Democratic contenders. As the 2016 race underscored, polling numbers ought to be taken with a giant grain of salt. But still, Sanders’ lead seems to have evaporated once the more “electable” Democrat announced his bid.

Let’s face it — both Biden and Sanders are older white men. But the demographics of the voters they attract are quite different from one another. Another poll, focused only on Iowa—the state with the earliest primary of the season—showed Biden and Sanders tied at exactly 24%. But 30% of Biden’s support is from those aged 65 and older, compared to only 15% for Sanders. Meanwhile, young Americans aged 18 to 31 prefer Sanders by 41%, compared to only 9% for Biden. One can speculate with a fair amount of confidence that this difference lies in Sanders’ unapologetic progressiveness versus Biden’s centrist waffling and his image as the “safe choice.”

Biden has made it very clear he is the leader who can be counted on to return the nation to its pre-2016 status quo, as if the Trump presidency were an inexplicable hiccup that briefly and horribly set us off course. In fact, he has said at various political rallies that “four years of this presidency will go down in history as an aberration.” Meanwhile, other Democratic contenders have rightly pointed out Trump is a symptom of the rightward political march in the nation, not a temporary setback. Biden appears to be espousing the same disastrous outlook his close ideological kin, Hillary Clinton, held in July 2016 when she responded to Trump’s slogan by retorting, “America is already great. America is already strong.”

Biden believes he is the only one who can take on Trump, reportedly saying, “If you can persuade me there is somebody better who can win, I’m happy not to do it.” He thinks he is the only one who can save the nation from another four years of Trump, just as Clinton felt she was easily poised to beat Trump. Yet on issue after issue, Biden is out of step with those Democrats who have successfully pushed their party to the left since 2016. For example, Biden, who has come under fire for supporting the 1994 crime bill, proudly asserted, “I’m the only guy ever nationally to beat the NRA because when we did the crime bill—everybody talks about the bad things. Let me tell you about the good thing in the crime bill.” In response, acclaimed filmmaker Ava DuVernay fired back, “Wait til you get in front of a crowd that actually knows what you’re doing. Knows the bill. Knows the generational damage. Wait. I hope I’m in the crowd.”

When a report emerged that Biden was taking a “middle-ground” approach to tackling climate change, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also pushed back, slamming him at an event promoting her popular Green New Deal resolution. She said, “I will be damned if the same politicians who refused to act then are going to try to come back today and say we need to find a middle-of-the-road approach to save our lives.”

Influential progressive voices like DuVernay and Ocasio-Cortez will push back on every issue in which Biden chooses the milquetoast center because they know American policies are not working for most Americans and a return to 2016-era policies will doom the nation.

Those who paint Biden’s detractors as being driven by idealistic motivations we cannot afford to espouse are ignoring the fact that Americans are at a breaking point. We do not have the luxury to wait another four or eight years to pick someone who will truly be a climate justice warrior—the planet’s atmosphere is at a breaking point. We do not have the luxury to wait four or eight years for a better candidate to usher in Medicare-for-all at a more practical time far off into the future—Americans are dying today in our broken health care system. We do not have the luxury of allowing millions of Americans to languish in prison cells, or allowing immigrant children to die in Border Patrol custody, or hampering the futures of college graduates burdened by debt. We do not have the luxury to allow our endless wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Yemen to continue as whole families are obliterated or turned into refugees. And we certainly cannot afford a new war on Iran. Choosing a president who promises a radical departure from the status quo is actually an act of pragmatism.

No comments: