Thursday, August 6, 2026

Faisal R. Khan — Statement of Condemnation: Senator Tuberville’s Islamophobic and Anti-Muslim Hate Attack on Abdul El Sayed

 From my friend Faisal Khan. We all must 
stand up against hate, bigotry, racism,
 and dehumanization in all of is forms 
and for truth, justice, kindness, 
caring, compassion, and love.
— Molly




Statement of Condemnation: Senator Tuberville’s Islamophobic and Anti-Muslim Hate Attack on Abdul El Sayed
Senator Tommy Tuberville’s claim that Michigan Democrats “voted to send a TERRORIST to the Senate” is not political criticism. It is bigotry, hate fear mongering speech dressed up as commentary, aimed at a man for one reason: he is Muslim.
Calling a Muslim United States candidate a terrorist and a radical Islamist who wants to “destroy America” is not a policy disagreement. It is the language of the Great Replacement theory, repackaged for a Senate seat. It tells voters that a Muslim American cannot be a patriot, cannot be trusted, and cannot hold power, because his faith itself is treated as evidence of an intent to destroy the country he was born and raised in. That is not rhetoric. That is a smear built on hate, and it puts real people in real danger.
This is inciting further hatred against Muslims and Muslim politicians. This is sickening. And it should never be normalized as ordinary political speech from a sitting United States senator.
I condemn this attack in the strongest terms. I call on Senator Tuberville to retract it. And I call on every elected official who has stayed silent to say, clearly and by name, that this is unacceptable.
If you are outraged by Senator Tommy Tuberville’s Islamophobic attack on Abdul El Sayed, please call and email his office today. Tell him this rhetoric is bigotry, anti-Muslim hate and racism, and demand he retract it and condemn the fear and hate it stirs up against Muslim Americans. His Washington DC office number is 202-224-4124. His Mobile, Alabama office number is 251-308-7233. Senator Tuberville does not list a direct public email address; constituents can reach him through the official contact form at tuberville.senate.gov/contact. Your call and your voice matter. Please make them heard.

Talarico Explains Infamous ‘Powell Memo’ to Texas Voters, Making Right-Wing ‘Master Plan’ a Campaign Issue

 Such an excellent, illuminating, and 
deeply important article!
— Molly

“The top 1% put the American Dream behind a paywall,” said the Texas Democrat as he unveiled a framework for his economic vision.

By Julia Conley

Politicians from both sides of the aisle have come to realize in recent years that “affordability” and “cost of living” are key issues voters want to hear about on the campaign trail, with nearly all respondents to a Harris Poll last month reporting they believe the US is currently in an affordability crisis.

But on Wednesday, before 1,300 Texans in the city of Arlington, state Rep. James Talarico (D-50), the Democratic US Senate candidate, contextualized the crisis for voters.

Talarico provided a history lesson that explained how—while his opponent, Attorney General Ken Paxton, has blamed the Biden administration for rising costs and the struggles of working Texans—“this affordability crisis isn’t something that happened over the last five years. This affordability crisis has been 50 years in the making.”

While introducing his economic platform, “The New American Dream,” Talarico held the audience’s attention as he explained the Powell Memo—a document formally titled “Attack on American Free Enterprise System,” which Virginia-based corporate lawyer Lewis Powell wrote in 1971 for his client, the US Chamber of Commerce.

The memo, said Talarico, provided “a blueprint for how corporations could amass political power, reverse the gains of the Great Society and the New Deal, and rig the system for themselves.”

“The Powell memo outlined a strategy. Unite corporate special interests, privilege corporate perspectives in the media, appoint sympathetic judges to the court, and buy politicians in both political parties,” continued Talarico. “And it worked. Republicans and some Democrats sold the false gospel of trickle-down economics.”

In the memo, Powell—who was appointed to the US Supreme Court by President Richard Nixon just months after he delivered the blueprint to the powerful Chamber of Commerce—outlined how the interests of corporate America should be framed as “individual freedom” that the country must protect.

Private companies should use political influence “aggressively and with determination” to stop “the stampedes by politicians to support any legislation related to ‘consumerism’ or to the ‘environment,’” wrote Powell, and should show no “reluctance to penalize politically those who oppose” the corporate effort.

“Strength lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort, and in the political power available only through united action and national organizations,” the memo argued.

The result of that “long-range planning” and “consistency of action over an indefinite period of years,” said Talarico, is the current political system—in which corporate interests pour billions of dollars into elections to support favorable candidates, Congress passes massive tax breaks for billionaires, and working families are left struggling to afford healthcare, childcare, and other essentials.

“Trickle-down economics is not a theory, it is theft,” he said. “Since the late 1970s, megadonors and corporate special interests have been buying politicians in both political parties. And then those politicians turned around and rigged the economy to benefit their wealthy donors at our expense. We have an affordability crisis because we have a corruption crisis.”

He added that five decades after the Powell Memo, “the top 1% put the American Dream behind a paywall”—pointing to the extreme wealth of tech CEOs like Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, while “one in five Texas children live in poverty.”

David Sirota of The Lever, whose team produced the award-winning 2024 podcast “Master Plan,“ which details the history and influence of the Powell Memo, applauded Talarico for speaking directly to voters about the long history behind today’s ”affordability crisis.“

“Talarico is recounting—and promising to fight—the master plan that we exposed. And he’s making that promise in one of America’s most high-profile Senate races,” said Sirota.

Talarico’s event in Arlington marked the beginning of a monthlong tour across Texas in which he plans to roll out his plans to begin reversing the decades of damage done by the Powell Memo and politicians from both major parties who have prioritized corporate interests over working Americans.

The candidate’s agenda includes raising the minimum wage; closing billionaire tax loopholes and ending tax breaks for the top 1% of earners in President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act; passing universal childcare; permanently expanding the child tax credit; passing an anti-corruption package to ban super political action committees; and providing down payment assistance for first-time home buyers.

“People are working hard every day,” said Talarico. “They’re playing by the rules. But those rules of today weren’t written for us. They were written for billionaires.”

Please go here for the original article: https://www.commondreams.org/news/powell-memo-1971

PLEASE ALSO WATCH THIS
RELATED EXCELLENT DOCUMENTARY:


Smothered by Riches: A History of the
Powell Memo by Peter Coyote

OR

Read the book: 

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Lewis Goldstein: War in Iran

 An excellent piece by our friend Lewis.
— Molly

Marzia Rezaei reacts while standing near the grave of her son, Erfan, who was killed in strikes, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, at Behesht-e Zahra cemetery, in Tehran, Iran, March 16, 2026. Alaa Al-Marjani, REUTERS
The aftermath of an Israel strike on a school in Minab, Iran [Abbas Zakeri/Mehr News/WANA via Reuters]

Simple Solution



War

There is an easy and effective solution to Trump’s and the world’s problem as regards the war in Iran. Yet the solution is close to impossible for a narcissist to enact. What is required is the simple truth.

Trump has to say to the Iranians that he made a mistake. He started a war, together with Israel, that he never should have started. He can begin by being accountable for needlessly killing 165 or so little girls by bombing their school and offer reparations to their families and to the families of everyone he killed. Then he can sit down with the Iranian leaders and negotiate to return, as much as possible, to the accord reached by Obama and Kerry. Finally, he can dissociate himself and America from Israeli influence, suspending all financial support of Netanyahu’s genocide and killing.

But of course this requires accountability and humility, the ability and willingness to admit to wrongdoing and recognize the consequences of his behavior. So far, this has proven impossible for Trump and his sycophants. This type of strength is beyond his prideful comprehension. It is also historically incomprehensible to most men. Homer wrote of the violent, terrible pride of men in his ancient epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey. In these stories, Odysseus leaves home and his beloved wife out of loyalty to King Menelaus, who goes to war because his too-young and beautiful wife, Helen, runs off with the young and handsome Paris. He abandons home and the divine feminine to fight and kill for ten years and then spends ten years trying to get back home. A terrible, tragic, and suffering result of toxic male pride. He does make it back to the divine feminine but only after much murder and mayhem. What a waste of life and love...an exciting and stupid story. A story we have lived by for thousands of years. A story available to us on Netflix, Fox, Amazon… and on… and on and on.

Our cultural stories of war and manhood are old, useless, and taking us to final catastrophe.

Here’s another suggestion. Pete Hegseth, “fearless warrior” and believer in the war story, should take estrogen instead of testosterone, grow a pair of ovaries, and shrink his pathetic balls.

The world will be better for it and for some honest, accountable truth.

It’s way overdue for us to conceive and create a world without war, once and for all. It may not sell as well among men at the box office, but we’ll all live longer and safer.

Please go here for the original article: https://goldsteinl.substack.com/p/war-in-iran

Monday, July 27, 2026

Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer: The Holding

Photo by Molly

 The Holding

Alone, I am too small to meet 
the great weight of your pain.
Loving, I want to turn toward you. 
Aching, I want to turn away.
But yesterday I rested for a time 
on a wide gray rock in an alpine cirque.
In my stillness I felt how surely 
I was cradled by the world so much 
vaster than I. There, surrounded
by greatness, I invited your pain 
into my heart and held you there in me. 
I breathed in your ache, my ache,
and felt us both surrounded 
by vast fields of wildflowers, 
by the deep green shoulders 
of sheer gray cliffs. I envisioned 
I was breathing out love, but more truly, 
I was being breathed by the mountain, 
or perhaps  by life itself.
The weight of the pain was no less, 
but I knew it as a blessing, 
a gravitational force magnetizing you and me.
What a gift to hold the weight together,
to know in my whole being  
how miraculously we are held. 

Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer


Sunday, July 26, 2026

Denise Stewart: Wanton Ecological Destruction and the Madness of Greed


I don’t usually post about “the war,” but someone needs to say out loud that this is not only slaughter of people, destruction of a region.

It is wanton ecological destruction.
If I went out today and set a forest fire, I would be charged, condemned, and punished, vilified and rightly so.
We all and the law, understand that one reckless human being does not have the right to endanger the living world.
And yet very questionable men in offices, uniforms, and boardrooms can gamble with an entire sea, an entire coastline, an entire region, an entire civilization, an entire population, and call it strategy.
Call it commerce.
Call it geopolitics.
They Dress it up in serious language and act as though it is something other than vandalism on a planetary scale.
A tanker too heavy for the safer route.
Offload half the cargo and lose money.
Turn back into danger and risk catastrophe.
Blow up an oil refinery, make it rain oil.
And somehow this passes for rational decision-making.
This is the madness of greed: the cargo is precious, the insurance is precious, the profits are precious, but the sea is treated as if she is infinite, mute, and there to absorb the consequences of male ambition.
She is not.
The coral, the fish, the birds, the currents, the shorelines, the air , the land, the future, all of it is being forced to pay the price for decisions made by people who will never personally drink the poisoned water, wash oil from feathers, or kneel in the ruin of what they have destroyed.
Word on the curb is, they might build a golf course and a luxury hotel over top of some of the devastation.
And still ordinary people are lectured.
Use less. Buy less. Recycle more.
Sip through your soggy paper straw.
Do your part.
Meanwhile the powerful set the world alight and call it policy.
That is the obscenity of it.
The law understands perfectly well that the natural world must be protected from YOU.
It becomes strangely confused when the potential offender owns a tanker, an oil company, or an army.
If one person torching a forest is a crime, then knowingly risking the poisoning of a sea should be treated as a crime too.
Because this is not collateral damage.
It is not unfortunate fallout.
It is not the cost of doing business.
It is desecration.
And I am tired of watching the Mother be treated like an expendable backdrop for the endless tantrums of empire, greed, and war.
But yes, they got you sucking on your soggy paper straw.


Nathan Nicholson: The Same Old Playbook

 Excellent! And 100% spot on!
— Molly


At Some Point Being Deceived
Becomes Choosing the Lie

Trump supporters: “Trump will make America great again!”
Then what, exactly, is “great” about what he is actually doing to America?
Are Trump supporters simply being deceived? Or do they genuinely support policies that deepen poverty, drive up the cost of living, inflate gas prices, enable scamflation and crony capitalism, funnel public money and government power toward Trump and his allies, send Americans to die in pointless wars, and allow a president to abuse his office for personal profit and political protection on a scale without precedent in American history?
Do they support a president who is systematically attacking elections, the courts, Congress, the free press, independent law enforcement, political opposition, and every institution capable of restraining his power?
And when the movement demands loyalty even through the Epstein scandal, protects Trump from meaningful scrutiny, attacks anyone demanding disclosure, and treats questions involving the sexual exploitation of children as just another partisan inconvenience, how much uglier does this have to get before people stop pretending this is about “making America great”?
The evidence is no longer hidden. It is happening in public. Trump tells people what he intends to do, does it in front of them, and then relies on propaganda, grievance, conspiracy theories, and tribal loyalty to convince his followers that the reality they can see with their own eyes is somehow fake.
At some point, “they were deceived” stops being a complete explanation.
Trump supporters fell for protofascist politics. Period. They were sold a mythology of national decline, internal enemies, betrayal, humiliation, and national restoration through one supposedly indispensable strongman. That is one of the oldest political scams in the fascist playbook.
And now the movement has advanced beyond rhetoric. Trump is concentrating power, demanding personal loyalty from government institutions, attacking independent centers of authority, using the state against political enemies, attempting to control elections, threatening the press, defying legal restraints, rewarding loyalists, and treating the presidency as an instrument of personal wealth, revenge, and permanent political power.
Trump looks less like a normal American president with every passing day and more like the kind of leader Americans were once taught to recognize as a warning.
The Mussolini comparison is no longer rhetorical excess. The Stalin comparison speaks to something equally disturbing: Trump’s totalitarian instinct and his obsession with enemies, personal loyalty, historical revision, institutional submission, and the idea that the leader himself should stand above every independent source of truth, law, or authority.
Calling Trumpism merely “authoritarian” at this point is becoming intellectually empty. Authoritarianism describes some of the methods, but the ambition is totalitarian.
Trump loves screaming “communist” and “socialist” at his enemies, even though true communism has never actually happened anywhere on this planet, Stalinism was totalitarianism rather than communism, and Hitler was no socialist. Yet Trump behaves more like those totalitarian dictators than any of the people he accuses.
The ugliest question is no longer whether Trump supporters were fooled at the beginning. It is how much evidence they can see, how much corruption they can excuse, how much cruelty they can normalize, and how many democratic restraints they can watch him destroy before continued support becomes something more than mere deception.
The playbook is old, and although the scapegoats change, the lie stays the same: manufacture an internal enemy, convince people that only one strongman can save them, and then demand more power in the name of national survival.
At some point, being deceived becomes choosing the lie. And when people knowingly defend the scapegoating, excuse the corruption, surrender democratic restraints, and demand more power for the strongman anyway, history has a name for the politics they are participating in:
Fascism.

Thursday, July 23, 2026

EXCELLENT! — Mo Husseini: It Ain't About TikTok, Ya Fuckin' Spoons.

 Just absolutely spot on!! Deepest gratitude, 
as always, to Mo Husseini!
— Molly
Missing the forest for the trees, with today's Democratic Party establishment.

By Mo Husseini

Everybody in the chattering classes has some theory about why Mamdani ‘works’ and (if I can offer my own theory) I think most of them are poking at the wrong thing. Whether it’s the Rent Freeze talk, or the buses, or his age, or the TikTok fluency, or the socialism, or his smile, or how he looks, or the fact that he’s a Muslim who says Palestine without checking the room first. And all of them are good. But I think they all miss the point.

It’s how he talks to people.
I think it’s really as simple as that.
He talks to people like they are adults. Like they can handle the truth. Like they can parse nuance. Like they can hear him and hear that he hears them. And in a Democratic party that has spent the past forty years learning how to address its own voters the way you’d talk to a toddler or a cat you’re trying to coax out of a tree (speak softly, move slowly, be comforting), when a guy shows up and just speaks to us straight, without the bullshit nostrums and pabulum, it’s quite the fucking contrast. He speaks to his constituency like they’re his peers, not the ‘marks’ in a con.
The Netanyahu business this week, is a great example of what I mean. Cards on the table from my side, I don’t have a single scintilla of doubt that Netanyahu is a war criminal and I think he should be tried for it. But put aside (if you can) the content of Mamdani’s video, because it’s not (to my mind) the controlling factor here.
What matters is that Mamdani spoke repeatedly during the campaign about how he’d have the NYPD arrest Bibi if he attended the UNGA kickoffs in NYC. And now, in office, the lawyers sit him down with the actual law and say, “Yeah… no. You don’t get to do that.” And instead of disappearing the promise, instead of memory-holing it (the consultant-reflex: delete the tweet, pretend it never happened), or lying and trying to BS his way through by acting like a mayor can execute an ICC warrant against a foreign head of state (the demagogue/Trump-reflex), he does the rarest thing in American politics. He levels. “We do not have the independent legal authority to enforce this warrant. The federal government, however, does, and I call on them to join the ICC and execute this warrant.” And then, he follows it up with the coda, “Netanyahu is not welcome in New York City, nor is any other war criminal at large.”
That…. Right there is the whole fucking thing in miniature.
He tells you the precise edge of his own power (this is what a mayor can actually do, this is what he can’t) and he keeps the moral pressure ratcheted all the way up at the very same time.
He doesn’t spin up a fantasy. He doesn’t dress it up as prudence. He tells you what’s what, hands you the brief and trusts you to read it: Here’s what a mayor can do, what a mayor can’t… here’s who’s actually got a hand on the switch, now go and lean on them. That is a man who assumes that you are smart enough to sit through a civics lesson without needing a squeezable applesauce tube and a little nap in the story corner afterward. The Democratic Party’s assumption is basically the exact opposite, and my argument is that voters know exactly and precisely which assumptions are being made about them.
He made a similar move on the pay raise he was offered this past week, and that one is probably more telling, because the stakes are so tiny. A pay bump is dangled in front of him, something like forty-seven grand on top of the two-fifty-eight he already pulls, and instead of the usual focus-grouped aria of gratitude and humility, he gives the flattest, most obvious human sentence available. Nobody I met on the campaign trail told me the mayor’s salary was too low. And then, “that’s not my concern either.” That’s it. That’s the whole fucking answer delivered without a ‘woe is me’ speech or a violin section. Just a grown-ass man saying an obvious true thing out loud, which somehow, in the year 2026, is laudable, because we’ve all managed to forget it should be the base-level, bog-standard, expectation.
And before you jump in with your “Duh… this only works in ultra-liberal NYC” bullshit and try to file my argument under the idea that he’s a regional-only lefty-boy-wonder leveraging some kind of coastal-socialist-Blue-State-charisma, or whatever the fuck stupid ass reductive pundit shorthand happens to be today’s Plat du Jour, let me point at the exact same frequency in a completely different zip code, because I really do think it has fuck-all to do with ideology.
Look at James Talarico, in Texas. A former grade-school teacher who went to seminary and is now, in the year of our lord 2026, somehow the Democratic nominee for the United States Senate. And he does one thing, over and over, relentlessly. He talks to his constituency in the kinds of language and with the kinds of thinking that they think in. He talks about scripture. He quotes from the Bible and speaks from inside the house. He sounds like them and speaks in a way that honors them and who they are, and then, FROM INSIDE that language… he jiu-jitsus the whole thing and reframes the issue as top-versus-bottom instead of left-versus-right. He fisked a bill jamming the Ten Commandments into public school classrooms on the floor of the State house and he did it in a language and from a place that the audience understood and aligned with. He spoke as a believing Christian and that was precisely what gave his critique teeth. The guy argued with Joe Rogan over abortion and framed his position through an analysis of the Annunciation, “creation has to be done with consent, you cannot force someone to create,” Buy the theology or don’t, I genuinely don’t give a flying fuck. I’m not talking about what Talarico believes. I’m talking about how he communicates.
Or look a little further north, at Rob Sand in Iowa. The dude is the only Democrat elected to anything statewide in years, and he’s running for governor and is probably one of our best shots at prying a governor’s mansion loose. And his whole approach is a rebuke to the last twenty years of bullshit Democratic strategy. He visits all ninety-nine counties in the state as a matter of plain routine, political humility, and electoral hygiene. The kid is standing in VFW halls and county fairgrounds full of three-time-MAGA voters, and he neither engages them with contempt, nor slobbers all over them. He just calls it like it is, in language that is clear and resonant and points out exactly who’s picking their pockets, and he sidesteps every last fucking bit of the culture-war bullshit. The guy has decided that a farmer in a folding chair is worth his time and deserves a straight answer, and that, friends, is the exact thing the national party forgot right around the time it decided that the middle of the country was a thing you fly over on the way to a fundraiser in the Hamptons from a fundraiser in Marin County.
Trump detonated the whole Republican party’s establishment exactly by point-blank refusing to speak in that sanded-down, poll-tested, say-nothing dialect the professionals all swore was the only safe way to talk. And that instinct was (painful as it is to say) entirely correct. The difference between Trump and Sand or Talarico or Mamdani though, is that Trump doesn’t respect his constituency. He flatters and lies to them instead. He’ll tell them whatever sounds good… That Mexico is going to pay for the wall… That the tariffs will come out of some foreigner’s pocket… That they’ll never ever have to do anything hard because they’re the best people ever. With Trump, it’s straight talk as a con but in lots of ways, 2016 Trump was the right-wing’s Mamdani. Which, IMHO, is a big part of why the left hasn’t been able to fight him effectively. He built that base in 2016, and yeah, it’s bleeding out now, but it’s still alive and still remembers the flattery.
Talarico and Sand and Mamdani are the honest version of that very same instinct, the version that hands you something true even when the true thing is nowhere close to what you were hoping to hear. Same voice. Opposite intent.
They hand you something you might not actually want to hear (I can’t arrest the guy, the salary’s fine, the real fight is top-versus-bottom and not the culture war they sold you, your own governor’s donors are quietly robbing you blind) based on the CRAZY assumption that you are an adult who would rather have the truth than the flattery. Texas, Iowa, NYC. It doesn’t matter.
Now go and stand Schumer and Jeffries next to any one of them. The whole corporate-dick-sucking-donor-class-reacharound-consultancy-brained leadership class is fluent in one specific dialect of nothing (We hear you… We’re fighting for you… The stakes have never been higher… Please do chip in five dollars). It’s like reading AI stories or listening to muzak… it’s a particular brand of inoffensive bullshit engineered to sound like a position without ever actually being one. Quotable as hell, and impossible to pin down.
People feel that shit. Voters aren’t dumb. They may be uninterested in politics, but when they do hear these guys, they can smell the bullshit coming off the screen. Because every platitude is itself a condescension. And every day brings another small daily dose of it, and eventually everyone on the receiving end knows it in their gut and switches off. The con’s blown, dipshits. The voters see it. They can see it in how you engage with them. Instead of treating them like adults, you’re saying “Listen idiots, I understand the machinery at an altitude you will simply never reach, so hush now, let me chew the complexity up for you and vomit it into your mouth, and you’ll thank me for it.”
It’s contempt with a comms team.
Mainstream Dems have optimized themselves clean into irrelevance. Every sentence run through the panel until it can’t offend anyone because it no longer means anything, every position triangulated to the exact center of a room full of tired ideas that have nothing to do with the moment.
And the sad reality that it highlights is that you don’t put every word you’re about to say through thirty undecided voters in a strip-mall conference room unless, somewhere down in the lizard-brain part of your skull, you have already decided the public is a hazard to be managed and not an equal to be leveled with.
The base worked this out ages ago. Democratic leadership now polls about as well with its own voters as the Republican establishment did back in 2015, right before that same base got fed up and fed it to Trump. Schumer got told “you are out of touch” to his face after helping wave through weapons for the very government whose prime minister Mamdani wants in handcuffs.
The house is on fire and Schumer and Jeffries are workshopping strongly-worded letters.
It’s been quite funny watching the idiot-consultant-class learn all the wrong lessons from Mamdani. They’re looking at the view counts and panicking and deciding that the magic is in the production design. They’re hiring ‘youngsters’ with a Premiere license to start cranking out vertical videos with the warm film grain and the red-and-orange retro fonts and the candidate ambling through a bodega in artfully rolled shirtsleeves, gesturing gravely at the price of eggs, and underneath all that lovely seventies color grade it will be the exact same triangulated mush it always was. We hear you. We’re fighting for you. Chip in five dollars.
It’s a fucking consultant-led-cult building things that LOOK like other things… not things that WORK like other things.
You cannot TikTok and art-direct and cool-slang your way to authenticity. What matters is whether we, the voters who you need to vote for you, actually believe that you think we’re your equals and that we deserve honesty and respect. And I promise you that there is no Instagram filter that will make that happen if it isn’t true.
People are just starving to be talked to like they’re not stupid. Say true things that you actually believe and say them in your own real voice, especially when it costs you something, and trust the people who are listening to you. That’s the whole trick. It’s not even much of a trick. And Mamdani didn’t fucking invent it. He just arrived at a moment where the Democratic Party has forgotten how to do a thing they used to be able to do.
It’s about respect. Everything else is noise.

Please go here for the original article: https://substack.com/home/post/p-208126379

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Zorhan Mamdani: Benjamin Netanyahu Is a War Criminal and Architect of a Horrific Genocide Against the Palestinian People

Well said and 100% spot on! It is so clear to me that what Zohran Mamdani is illuminating here is the insanity of how what is so profoundly needed and just is deemed not necessary, not possible, not justified. After all, we’re just talking about an ongoing genocide. Right?! Allowing the psychopath war criminal Netanyahu to walk around free and be welcomed in our country is the equivalent to welcoming Hitler in the midst of the Holocaust. It’s just insane madness. Meanwhile I passionately support, applaud, appreciate, respect, and am inspired by Mayor Mamdani and all who fiercely seek justice in a brutal unjust world. May they inspire us all! — Molly

BREAKING: CHECKMATE! Mayor Zohran Mamdani releases a historic video calling Israeli PM Netanyahu a "war criminal" and DEMANDS that the federal government arrest him if he steps foot in the U.S.
This just put Trump in an impossible position...
"Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal, the architect of a horrific genocide against the Palestinian people. He is responsible for the killing of more than 73,000 people..." the mayor stated in an official video posted to X.
This kind of statement, a blunt admission of the truth, was unthinkable just a few short years ago. But now, after witnessing the wholesale slaughter in Gaza, much of the Democratic Party is embracing what the rest of the world has long been saying. Israel is conducting a genocide and Netanyahu is its mastermind.
"...for the maiming of tens of thousands of children, as those who survive undergo amputation without anesthesia," continued Mamdani. "For the targeting of neonatal hospitals and maternity care centers, denying newborns even the chance to live."
"For the countless people he starved as he blocked food and hundreds of aid workers and journalists. And just last month, the UN confirmed that Palestinian children continue to be deliberately targeted and killed by Israeli armed forces, more than eight months after the so-called ceasefire."
"The list goes on and on. All as we, as Americans, pay for the bombs that do the killing," said Mamdani. "There is a reason the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest."
"As human beings, we have spent generations building a shared understanding that there are crimes so grave they offend all of humanity," he continued. "Anyone, with their eyes, with their heart, with their conscience, should recognize the devastation he has wrought and understand that he belongs before a court of law. As I've said, I agree with the ICC that Benjamin Netanyahu should be arrested and tried for his crimes, as I do for anyone else charged by the ICC."
"My administration has reviewed every avenue available, under applicable law, to determine whether New York City could execute the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant if Benjamin Netanyahu came here," the mayor said. "It is clear that we do not have the independent legal authority to enforce this warrant. The federal government, however, does, and I call on them to join the ICC and execute this warrant."
This is a crucial point. In recent days, Mamdani's discussion of possibly arresting Netanyahu has engendered vitriolic rage from the radical pro-Zionist minority in this country. Trump himself rushed to Truth Social to insist it would not happen. It's not enough for these people that Israel be given the weapons to carry out their genocide and regional conquests, they also demand that the rest of us treat their political leaders like kings instead of the criminals they are.
If Mayor Mamdani had the authority to do so, it's clear that he would arrest Netanyahu. But this kind of high profile, international act can only be ordered by the White House. And unlike Trump, Mamdani respects the rule of law.
By demanding action from the federal government, the mayor is placing the onus squarely on Trump's shoulders. Of course, this President would never in a million years consider holding Netanyahu accountable for his actions. They're mass-murdering birds of a feather (to say nothing of the possibility that Mossad has blackmail on Trump from his time with Epstein).
What this call to action from Mamdani really does is tie Trump inexorably to the Netanyahu regime. When he inevitably refuses to arrest this man, he'll be sending a full-throated message to the American people that he totally supports the deeply unpopular government in Tel Aviv. Israel First is the slogan of this administration. With the midterms right around the corner, that's a recipe for electoral disaster for MAGA.
"And I want to be equally clear, Benjamin Netanyahu is not welcome in New York City, nor is any other war criminal at large," Mamdani added. "While we cannot end the genocide on our own, we can decide whether our silence will become another weapon, and we can examine every tool we have to defend the humanity and dignity of all people. That is my commitment to you."
Please like and share if you stand with Zohran and New York City!

Copied from Occupy Democrats