Wednesday, February 25, 2026

EXCELLENT — Dr. Stacey Patton: The Most Pathetic Image of This State of the Union

Such an excellent, well articulated, and 100% spot on article by Dr. Stacey Patton. I've come to deeply respect and appreciate this courageous woman and the vital shadow work, insights, deeper truths. and wisdom she embodies. Blessed be the truth-tellers, the wisdom-keepers, the brave and brilliant journalists and historians, authors and artists, poets and professors, and activists and visionaries among us. May they inform and inspire us all. — Molly

There is something almost elegant about the absurdity of a Black congressman having to remind the President of the United States that his people are not primates.

The camera catches it before the speech even begins. Donald Trump moves down the aisle with his red tie blazing against navy. His face is set in that familiar granite scowl. The chamber glows under the chandelier light. The polished wood gleams. Pressed suits absorb the light. Flags fold into obedient symmetry. It is the annual ritual of American power, the State of the Union, where applause is choreographed and dissent is supposed to be tidy.

And then, rising above the rows of dark suits, a white placard cuts through the pageantry: BLACK PEOPLE AREN’T APES!

The sign is not improvised. It is rigid. Clean-edged. Camera-ready. This is not a napkin scribble. Not a frantic hallway scrawl. The board is firm, rectangular, professionally cut. The lettering is printed, thick, uniform, and industrial black. There’s no bleed. No tremor. No hand shake.

Representative Al Green stands stiff-backed, jaw locked, holding the sign at chest level as Trump enters the chamber. Around him, lawmakers twist in their seats. Some smirk. Some freeze. Some lift their phones.

And then a white hand lunges into the frame. It reaches across Green’s body, fingers splayed, trying to cover the words. Trying to block the message. Trying to yank the sign downward, as if erasing the sentence could erase the reality that made it necessary.

Notice the instinct. It does not point at the sign. It does not argue with the statement. It does not debate the premise. It covers. The reflex is concealment, not persuasion. The gesture is intimate in its entitlement. To reach across another man’s chest in a formal chamber, to physically attempt to blot out the words, is visceral.

That reach tells you something older than policy. It is the muscle memory of managing the frame. For a split second, the image crystallizes: a Black congressman holding a declaration of humanity, and a white hand scrambling to suppress it. Umph. You could not script a cleaner metaphor for American politics in 2026.

Weeks after racist AI monkey imagery circulated online, weeks after the same dehumanizing trope that fueled lynch mobs and minstrel shows found new life in digital code, this sign is the counterpunch inside the most powerful legislative chamber in the country.

In the age of artificial intelligence, biometric tracking, militarized borders, and executive power games, we are still arguing about whether Black people belong to the human family. Not on some fringe message board. In the Capitol. During Black History Month.

There is something almost surreal about the layering of it. And in the middle of that institutional grandeur, we are locked in a debate that should have died with phrenology.

Black. People. Aren’t. Apes.

The fact that those words need to be written, in 2026, tells you everything about where we are. And the fact that a white hand instinctively reaches to smother them tells you even more.

Now watch Trump move through the frame.

He doesn’t hurry. He never hurries. He glides down the aisle as if the room belongs to him. His chin is tucked. Hands reach toward him. Lawmakers lean in. He absorbs it all without appearing to absorb anything.

The sign is technically behind him. That spatial detail matters. The accusation exists at his back. The moral correction is not even in his line of sight. He does not have to acknowledge it to dominate the frame. He advances. The sign remains stationary. One body in motion. One body fixed. Green stands still, holding a declaration that should not need to exist. Trump moves forward untouched by it.

There is no flinch when the sign rises behind him. No flicker of embarrassment. No visible irritation. Because why would there be?

This is a man who launched his political ascent by questioning Barack Obama’s citizenship. A man who called immigrants “animals” and warned that they were “poisoning the blood” of the country. A man who told congresswomen of color to “go back” to where they came from. A man who, just weeks ago, said he didn’t make a mistake when he amplified that racist AI monkey video.

He has shown us who he is. Over and over again. Age has not softened Trump’s racism. Power has only clarified it. There is no late conversion coming. This is not a phase. He will not evolve. He will fossilize like this.

As Trump reaches the podium, the tone of the speech follows the same architecture. “Law and order.” Border rhetoric framed as invasion. Federal institutions described as infiltrated and corrupted. Strength. Control. Reclamation.

The “American people” he invokes is selective. The threats he names are deliberate. The applause lines land exactly where they are meant to. He is not confused about the accusations. He is not wrestling with introspection.

He is resolute.

And that’s what makes this scene feel so small. You cannot shame somebody who has monetized shamelessness. You cannot embarrass someone who has built an empire on defiance of embarrassment and white grievance. You cannot remind someone of humanity when their political power thrives on selectively denying it.

So when Al Green lifts that sign, the message exists in a different universe from the man walking toward the podium. Green is speaking in the language of moral correction. Trump is operating in the language of power consolidation. Those are not the same battlefield.

And that’s the mismatch burned into this moment: a chamber glowing under television lights, a Black congressman defending baseline humanity, a white hand trying to suppress it, and an aging racist president moving forward untouched.

And then Al Green is escorted out. Again.

There’s a brief shuffle. The murmur in the chamber swells and then smooths itself flat. The chandeliers don’t flicker. The flags don’t shift. The polished wood keeps gleaming. The applause resumes, bright, obedient, and well-timed.

Hundreds of years after our forced arrival on this soil, a Black man stands in the Capitol defending our humanity, and he is removed for disrupting decorum. Trump reaches the podium untouched. The red tie settles against his shirt. The speech rolls forward. The cameras glide.

Power keeps congratulating itself. Keeps on applauding itself. Keeps swallowing the interruption whole. And we are still here in 2026, during Black History Month, arguing that we are not animals to people who feel no shame about believing it, and who are hardened beyond repair.

America. A nation that still requires proof of Black humanity, and then applauds when the proof is escorted out the room.

Please go here for the original article: https://drstaceypatton1865.substack.com/p/the-most-pathetic-image-of-this-state

Jeff Foster On the Shadow Side of Spiritual Teachers Who Claim Transcendence While Modeling Spiritual Bypassing

This is such a vital 100% spot on  piece! Thank you, Jeff Foster.

As someone with a history of deep trauma, I’d been very disassociated — which is something that served me through my childhood and helped me to survive. In sobriety and once on a healing journey, my ongoing untouched and unhealed deeper trauma also made me vulnerable to faux spiritual teachers like Eckhart Tolle, David Hawkins, Bryon Kate, and others who reinforced spiritual bypassing — with harmful consequences to myself and those around me, including my children. This has been among the painful and yet also empowering lessons that I have learned and have come to be deeply grateful for today. 

As others have said, in far too many nonduality spiritual circles it is the inner work that is bypassed. In these cases, what can appear like transcendence is actually disassociation from our fullness as embodied human beings.

It’s my belief that it is deeply important to shine bright light on the shadow side of what we experience and witness as human beings and this includes many revered spiritual teachers. We need to name them, expose the harm that is caused through spiritual bypassing, and illuminate the devastating abuse by those such as Deepak Chopra and so many others. For me personally, this has included a therapist who abused and traumatized me, and also the former leading teacher of our spiritual community who had an affair with a sangha member who then committed suicide. As I have engaged in healing my injured instincts, what I have come to realize today is how pervasive those who offer teachings, therapy, spiritual guidance, and more actually can often cause more harm than healing and empowerment to their patients, clients, and followers. 

For years into my sobriety, in addition to the abuse I had experienced by a therapist, I had unknowingly also remained vulnerable to illness (fibromyalgia, which I’ve now been completely symptom free of for 20+ years), other non substance addictions, impaired parenting, unhealthy relationships, and more because of my unprocessed trauma. Even with years of sobriety and counseling, there had unknowingly remained abandoned exiled parts of myself. And these old untouched wounds continued to serve as obstacles to a strong connection with my heart and the experience of being a fully embodied human being.

Today I recognize that I am far from being alone. Which is why pieces like this one by Jeff Foster and others are so important. It is my belief that there is a duty to warn, a responsibility to shine light on the shadow side of those whose teachings can both sometimes be helpful but also cause harm, and to hold accountable those whose spiritual bypassing and/or abuse further traumatizes already traumatized people.

I appreciate Jeff Foster, Lissa Rankin, and others for empowering us through speaking the truth and sharing and inspiring us with their wisdom, insights, compassion, and deep caring. May we all connect with those resources which are truly helpful to us on our sacred human journeys. 🙏 Molly


When Disassociation Masquerades
as Awakening

“You don’t have to take six months to get over this. Just step out of it now.”
The spiritual teacher Rupert Spira responded this way to someone who vulnerably shared in a group about their heartbreak over a recent breakup. I have heard similar responses from Rupert in other contexts.
(The following is not an attack on Rupert personally, or on this particular quote, but a challenge and a critique of a more general philosophical position of which Rupert is a well known representative. It is said with love and respect. Being loving does NOT always mean agreeing with someone. Sometimes it means discernment, pushing back, asking robust and honest questions, speaking up when we feel someone has missed the mark.)
When I first encountered Rupert’s teaching many years ago, and Advaita more generally as shared by many teachers, I resonated deeply with much of it. The clarity around Awareness. The relief of recognising that we are not limited to thought, feeling, or the body. That understanding genuinely helped me at a certain stage of my spiritual path. Rupert was never my teacher, but like many, I was influenced by that general perspective.
Today, as a husband and father, having travelled to the mountaintops of spiritual awakening and walked back down into the marketplace of ordinary life, having been brought kicking and screaming to death’s door with Lyme disease and burned clean and reborn in that sacred fire, I stand somewhere else now.
When someone says they have just been through a rupture in their reality and it has hit them hard, suggesting they can simply “step out of it” and return to a “non suffering” Awareness may sound appealing. It may even be metaphysically correct within a very strict non dual framework.
But psychologically, it can easily land as bypassing.
Heartbreak is not a philosophical error. It is attachment rupture. It is sacred grief moving through the nervous system. It is shock, loss, disorientation. From a trauma informed perspective, these responses are not illusions or mental mistakes to transcend. They are embodied processes that demand presence. The body needs time. Safety. Witnessing. Integration. We are beginning to understand this more clearly as a collective.
Telling someone to “step out” of heartbreak can subtly teach them to step out of themselves. Of their own hearts. Of their own bodies.
And that is not liberation, that is dissociation.
Dissociation can feel spacious at first, of course! It can masquerade as awakening, and I have written at length about this very thing. When grief is not met and integrated and metabolised, it does not simply disappear. It goes underground. Hardens. Shape-shifts. Eventually resurfaces as anxiety, depression, numbness, relational volatility, even abuse directed at self or others.
What we do not fully face comes back to haunt us in our personal lives.
This matters.
Please understand, I am not rejecting non dual insight. There is real depth there. I have written several books from that understanding myself. It still forms the bedrock of everything I do.
What I am challenging is the automatic reflex to prioritise transcendence over integration. To reach directly for the Absolute when the human nervous system is crying out for tenderness, care, emotional validation, deep human honesty.
*To offer the sky when someone actually needs far more ground.*
(Rupert, I’m not attacking you. I recognise this reflex. I have been very guilty of it myself in the past!)
For me now, spiritual maturity is not about floating above experience and chasing Pure Awareness. It is about inhabiting life. Fully. In the body. Messily. Tenderly. With curiosity, playfulness, and profound presence. It is about staying with difficulty instead of fleeing to the seeming cleanliness of the infinite.
Yes, we are Awareness. Now.
And… heartbreak hurts like hell and can take lots of time to heal.
Lots of time.
Both perspectives can be true. Both are absolutely essential.
It takes real maturity to hold these two perspectives AT ONCE. To hold this stunning paradox as you would hold a most beloved newborn.
If Advaita is to mature, it MUST include the nervous system. It MUST honour and include attachment, trauma, embodiment. Otherwise it remains metaphysically elegant, but psychologically naïve.
For me, spirituality must be LIVED. In the body. In relationship. In fierce honesty. In responsibility to our kids and partners. In integrity. In the raw, wild, sensual, erotic, agonising, glorious shaking vulnerability of being fully human.
It is saying sorry. It is vulnerably sharing your doubts. It is telling the truth. It is sharing your pain and your joy. It is standing with your partner, looking into her eyes, trembling, speaking your deepest truth and receiving hers without escaping into transcendence. No bypassing. No hiding in the Absolute. Just two nervous systems meeting in honesty. THAT is fucking Advaita. It’s not concepts, it’s not just pretty words on paper, it’s visceral and tangible and noisy and imperfect and real.
Heartbreak is not a mistake in consciousness, or a shameful remnant of the “separate self” to be extinguished somehow. As I wrote several years ago, upon waking up to the shadow side of Advaita:
“…I vowed to bow to that fucking broken heart as if it were God Herself. Until the end of time.”
I still mean that.
Anything less no longer moves me, and no longer feels true.