Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Jermaine Fowler: The Axe and the Tree

This is such an excellent piece by Jermaine Fowler!
— Molly

By Jermaine Fowler

“We Are All to Blame for the Attack on Iran.”

That was Esquire magazine this week. Ninety-two years of American journalism, and that was the best they had. The subline: “We elected, twice, a man with no conscience, no ethics, no empathy, and no concept of how to wield power.”
Who is the “we”?
When the country had the chance to stop this, nearly every group helped him win. Men went 55% for him. White voters, 55%. Hispanic voters split nearly even. Young voters split. The country looked at this man and called it a coin flip, a toss-up, close enough to go either way.
One group was not close. Eighty-six percent of Black voters voted against him. Not a coin flip. Not a split decision. A verdict. The only group in America that saw this man with near-unanimous clarity was the group that has been seeing men like him with near-unanimous clarity for four hundred years.
That verdict was not enough. He won. And now the house he built is cracking. Republican support for his policies has dropped from 67% to 56%. The share of his own voters who believe he acts ethically fell from 55% to 42%. Podcasters who built their audiences carrying his message are calling for impeachment. Media figures with millions of followers are posting that he lied to his voters and backstabbed his country. One of the most listened-to voices in America told a guest on air that the whole movement is divided now, that one of the things they voted for was no war, and now they are in one.
The people who built this are watching it collapse. And the headline says “we.”
There is no “we.” There is the axe and there is the tree.

__________

The Axe Discovers What It Cut

On Saturday, the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran. Operation Epic Fury. Six American soldiers dead in Kuwait. One hundred forty-eight girls killed in a school airstrike in Minab. Skies across the Gulf are empty. The State Department told Americans to leave the Middle East immediately, on commercial flights that no longer exist. A retired general stranded in the UAE told a reporter he feels abandoned. The British government is evacuating its citizens. America told its people to figure it out.
He tells it like it is. He will shake things up. At least he is not her. The photos with Epstein, the lawsuits, the accusations -- all public, all before the vote. They voted anyway. Then the files came out. His name 38,000 times in the redacted version. Over a million in the unredacted files his own DOJ tried to hide. Six soldiers and 148 schoolgirls later, here we are.
By Sunday the fracture was public. Conservative commentators who spent years telling their audiences to trust this man were reversing on camera. One who had warned a year ago that if this president launched a war in Iran he would apologize for the rest of his life went on air and made good. Another, with millions of followers, called it the biggest fall from grace he had ever seen. Another said the movement was splitting in real time.
The language everywhere was the same. He lied. He betrayed us. This is not what we voted for.
As if the tree had not been saying so for years.

___________

The Tree Remembers

There is a proverb that crosses continents and centuries. West African. Caribbean. The American South. The version changes. The truth does not.
The axe forgets, but the tree remembers.
The axe forgets because for the axe, the swing was just a moment. A vote. A hat. A flag on a bracket. A rally that felt like church. Forgetting costs the axe nothing. It was one choice among many. A vibe. A calculation. A gamble that seemed reasonable at the time.
The tree remembers because the tree was cut and kept the record. The scar is the wound and the evidence. It is how the tree knows what the axe does, because the tree watched it swing before anyone else admitted it was swinging.
The tree is the 86%. Black America. The ones who saw clearly and said so. Du Bois connected Jim Crow to European fascism in the 1930s, before the camps were built. Claudia Jones called it a fascist and imperialist system from a courtroom before they deported her. Frederick Douglass asked what the Fourth of July means to the enslaved in 1852.
Ida B. Wells documented lynching as state terror when the country still called it justice. Generation after generation, the truth about what this country was while everyone else recited the myth. The 86% is the product of four hundred years of clear sight, passed down, earned, refused, and proven right again. Acting on that sight has never been free. It has cost jobs and neighborhoods and lives, and it has changed nothing except the price of telling the truth in a country that does not want to hear it.
They watched every other group treat the most dangerous man in American politics like a coin flip -- 53% here, 55% there, split decision, toss-up -- and they voted against him at 86% because they recognized what centuries of record-keeping had taught them to recognize.
Now the axe posts apologies. He LIED to us. As if the tree had not been saying so the entire time. As if this were not exactly what the tree said would happen, in exactly the words the tree used, at exactly the volume the tree could manage before the axe told it to be quiet.
And the headline asks the tree to share the blame. “We are all to blame.” The tree never swung. The demand to share guilt is the axe swinging again. The innocence of “we” is itself another cut.
People would rather hand the wheel to someone who sounds certain than sit with the terror of deciding for themselves. That is the trade. You give up judgment for relief. It feels like freedom but it is the opposite. The thing about giving someone the wheel is you do not get to choose where he drives. They gave him the wheel. He drove to Iran. They want it back. It does not come back.
The axe does not look at what it did. It cannot afford to. The tree cannot afford not to.

___________

The Scar

Two conversations are happening across every platform in this country.
The first is the sound of the axe discovering what it did. The language of shock, as if the man who lied about everything was not going to lie about this too. Apologies appearing where flags used to be. Posts deleted. Accounts scrubbed. The same mouths that said trust him now saying we were deceived, as if deception were something that happened to them and not something they chose to look past.
The second is quieter. The 86%. Not grieving. Unsurprised. The people who kept the record, who told the truth about the founding, who warned about this man in the same voice they have used to warn about this country since before it called itself a country. Watching people arrive at conclusions they reached generations ago. The feeling is not vindication. Vindication would require that being right prevented something. It did not. Being right meant you saw the cut before it landed and could not stop the swing.
Now the headline says “we.” The axe wants the tree to hold the handle too. Share the guilt. Distribute the weight so nobody has to carry what they chose.
The axe forgets. It always does.
The tree remembers. It always will.
Who is the “we”?

Please go here for the original article, notes & sources: https://thehumanityarchive.substack.com/p/the-axe-and-the-tree

Sunday, March 1, 2026

Reflections On Understanding the War on Iran and Responding Wisely to These Dark Times

Photo by Molly


There are so many layers to the horrifying war against Iran by Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu and what has brought us to where we are today.

It is nothing short of pure evil madness to be attempting regime change, starting a catastrophic war, sabotaging midterm elections, distracting from the Epstein files, lining the pockets of the powerful who benefit from war, killing thousands, displacing and inflicting terror on millions, risking nuclear war, destroying the Earth and accelerating the climate crisis — all this and more at the hands of a malignant narcissist and his sociopathic fascist enablers who are the embodiment of greed, hatred, and delusion. These are such tragic, dangerous, and frightening times!

It is my belief that there are two imperatives for us today and which also extend back through time and into the future:

1. Inform ourselves. Seek consistently reputable resources. Discern who can be trusted and who cannot. Embody a profound commitment to truth and refuse to be pulled in by subtle and blatant propaganda. Courageously seek depth and empower ourselves with understanding of the many layers that we are faced with internally and in our shared outer world. Follow threads wherever they may lead which represent truth, justice, compassion, and fierce love. Stay open, embrace not-knowing and humility. Cultivate and grow in a passionate pursuit for how the truth can empower us to ever more deeply identify and do our part individually and collectively in bringing about a more just, kind, and peaceful world.

These are among the interwoven issues and many excellent links which I have found empowering in better understanding the crisis of the war against Iran and what has brought us here:

This is just a glimpse among countless other illuminating and trustworthy resources and links which are not doing the bidding of the military industrial complex, neoliberal or fascist politicians, the mainstream corporate funded media, etc. Perhaps many of you are already aware of and connected with these resources. And many are not.

2. Respond wisely. It is my experience that there are also many layers to what empowers us to respond to these dark times in ways which help and heal rather than cause more harm. Sometimes this is really hard and especially when we are confronted with and witness to so much injustice, suffering, separation and dehumanization, trauma and terror, and the many other faces of violence and unprocessed ancestral and cultural trauma.

To empower ourselves to respond to the horrors and heartbreaks of these times, what comes to me are these glimpses into what has been helpful, healing, empowering, and transformative for me:
  • remember to take time for self care
  • deepen in our spiritual paths and practices
  • embody a daily practice of gratitude
  • notice beauty
  • connect with resources which help us to grieve and keep our hearts open
  • continue the inner work of recognizing, healing, unburdening, and transforming our own ancestral and cultural pain and trauma
  • address our substance and non-substance addictions and the pain that underlies them (https://mollystrongheart.blogspot.com/2026/02/reflections-on-what-sobriety-means-to.html)
  • practice wise speech and seek and speak the truth
  • cultivate community
  • practice random acts of kindness
  • notice what does not suck (https://mollystrongheart.blogspot.com/2026/02/reflections-on-practice-of-noticing.html)
  • commit to not returning dehumanization and hatred with more of the same
  • deepen and expand our capacity for empathy and compassion
  • find our own ways of practicing activism as an antidote to despair
  • seek out wisdom-keepers, truth-tellers, visionaries, authors and artists, and others who inform and inspire  this can be through in-person experiences, in books, community gatherings, on-line events, and any resources which facilitate a strong relationship with the wisdom of our hearts
  • practice vulnerability and cultivate authenticity in our relationships
  • expand and deepen our capacity and embodiment of fierce love
This, again, is just a glimpse of the many ways, ideas, values, practices that might help us respond wisely to these very challenging times. On the web version of my blog, and below all of the photographs, there are also some "favorite websites, authors, and resources" which you may find helpful. In addition, I also wrote this longer piece regarding what we and our world need to healhttps://mollystrongheart.blogspot.com/2025/05/some-thoughts-on-embodying-what-we-and.html

I'm sure that we each will have our own unique ways of meeting both the sorrows and the joys of our times. So please just take what you like and leave the rest.

None of what I am addressing here today will make the pain and trauma that we are experiencing and witnessing go away. That said, maybe something here will help change our relationship with some of what is deeply disturbing, traumatic, and frightening to experience and bear witness to. I hope so.

We are all one human family, one interrelated planetary family, and all in this together. May we grow in consciousness, support, and love together.

With Metta,
💜
Molly

Faisal R. Khan: Death Toll in Israeli and United States Attack on Iranian Girls' Primary School Rises to 148

 An excellent piece by my friend Faisal Khan. 
— Molly

You cannot celebrate “regime change” in theory
while ignoring the human cost in reality

The United States does not act out of concern for the Iranian people, nor out of any consistent commitment to democracy, international laws, or human rights. Those claims function as rhetoric, not principle.
History makes this clear: in 1953, the U.S., through the CIA, helped orchestrate the overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, after he moved to nationalize Iran’s oil. Washington then backed the Shah’s authoritarian rule for decades, sustaining a repressive regime aligned with U.S. interests. This pattern of removing independent governments and installing compliant ones has been repeated in multiple regions of the world.
Israel continues to expand genocidal policies against the Palestinian people and again have closed the Rafah border that is a vital lifeline for humanitarian aid to Palestinians. We are also witnessing the destruction and further occupation of Palestinian territory in the West Bank that is clear violation of international laws. Israel’s recent remarks on expansionism, justified through familiar language of security, civilization, and strategic access that has long accompanied imperial expansion, including the rationale used by the United States its war in Iraq, and we are seeing the same pattern towards Iran.
Furthermore, despite the clear risk of wider regional destabilization which we are not seeing it in real time and the awareness of many governments, much of the international community has remained unwilling to take meaningful action to halt the destruction Palestinian lands and its people, enforce legal norms, or challenge the continuing aggression.
Where are all the human rights drum beaters? People have come short of condemning the killing of over 100 children. You cannot expect anything better from those who wage war without conscience, claiming precision when it suits them, yet somehow failing to distinguish that there are school children in a school. And those who have even come short of condemning the death of children are equally pathetic, to say the least.
Whether you agree or not with Iran’s political ideology, hardline governance, foreign interference, and the long history of proxy conflicts as many countries in the region and around the world have, one thing should remain clear: this is not a victory for ordinary people. It is a tragedy, one that risks deepening fear, entrenching deep anti American sentiments and opinions, and hardening attitudes for an entire generation that will grow up confirming that the US given it’s history with Iran is that they are not friends rather than seeing pathways to reform or reconciliation.
History shows that bombing civilian populations and killing children does not create stability, democracy, or peace. It fuels resentment, empowers the most hardline voices, and closes the space where moderation might have survived. You cannot celebrate “regime change” in theory while ignoring the human cost in reality.
You cannot claim to stand for human rights only when it is politically convenient. The value of a child’s life does not change based on their nationality, their government, or whether their suffering fits someone’s narrative.
According to Oman’s government negotiations were still in progress and there was a real chance at an agreement, then carrying out strikes at that moment is a serious violation of the legal and diplomatic norms that are supposed to prevent escalation in the first place. Undermining talks with force doesn’t create any real resolution; it destroys trust, strengthens hardliners, and fuels anger and backlash that ordinary people will live with long after the headlines fade. Actions like this don’t advance peace or stability, they make both far harder to achieve.
Grieving innocent lives and questioning violence against them is not partisan. It is the bare minimum of our shared humanity. When we start making exceptions for which children deserve outrage, we’ve already lost something far more important than any geopolitical argument.

A Message From an Iranian Man

 

From an Iranian man; a message left on Cyrus Janssen's YouTube channel:

"As an Iranian, I can tell you the situation is no longer just political—it's existential. We are trapped between two collapsing structures: one internal, one external. On one hand, we face a deeply dysfunctional government, led by the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Republic’s unelected institutions.
Decades of economic mismanagement, suppression of dissent, and brutal ideological control have alienated multiple generations. No one believes in reform anymore—because every attempt has either been co-opted or crushed. But here's the paradox: We are also terrified of regime collapse—because we've watched the aftermath of Western intervention in countries like Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan. Each was promised freedom; each descended into chaos, civil war, or foreign occupation.
So no, we don't trust the U.S. or Israel. Not because we support our regime—but because we know how imperial powers treat ‘liberated’ nations in the Middle East.
Freedom, in their language, often means vacuum, fire, and permanent instability. Right now, many Iranians live with three truths at once: The Islamic Republic is morally and politically bankrupt. The alternatives offered by foreign actors are not liberation—they’re collapse.
A bad government is survivable. No government is not. We are not silent because we agree. We are cautious because we’ve learned—too well—what happens when superpowers decide to "help." In a sentence: Iran is a nation held hostage by its own regime, but haunted by the fate of its neighbours. We are stuck in a house we hate, surrounded by fires we fear more."

_____________

I found this message which had first been shared by Pamela Olson.

“It’s Always About Oil”: CIA & MI6 Staged Coup in Iran 70 Years Ago, Destroying Democracy in Iran

 THE HISTORY WE NEED TO KNOW. 
— Molly



This program was first aired in 2023:

We look at the 70th anniversary of the August 19, 1953, U.S.- and U.K-backed coup in Iran, which took place two years after Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh nationalized Iran’s oil industry that had been controlled by the company now known as British Petroleum. “If nationalization in Iran of oil was successful, this would set a terrible example to other countries where U.S. oil interests were present,” explains Ervand Abrahamian, Iranian historian and author of Oil Crisis in Iran: From Nationalism to Coup d’Etat and The Coup: 1953, the CIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations. While the CIA has historically taken credit for Mosaddegh’s overthrow, “the British have not admitted their leading role,” notes Iranian filmmaker Taghi Amirani, whose documentary film Coup 53 uncovers the influence of MI6 agents who sought to preserve their imperial-era access to Iranian oil and pulled in the Americans by promising a “slice.” Seventy years later, says Amirani, “We are still living with the ripples of this disastrous event.”

Please go here for the original program and full transcript: https://www.democracynow.org/2023/8/23/ervand_abrahamian_iran_coup_1953_anniversary

From 2003 — 50 Years After the CIA’s First Overthrow of a Democratically Elected Foreign Government We Take a Look at the 1953 US Backed Coup in Iran

This Democracy Now! program from 23 years ago is deeply relevant to what is happening today related to the war against Iran and essential to know and understand. For far too long US citizens have heard that Iran hates America. At the same time that we are justifying the dehumanization of Iranians, so often we have no idea why there would be any feeling of hostility toward our country. Understanding the shadow side of the American Empire is essential. This includes the first regime change in Iran that took place in 1953. The CIA and British intelligence orchestrated a coup d’etat that toppled the democratically elected government of Iran — the government of Mohammad Mossadegh. The horrific impact of this coup continues to be felt by Iranians over 70 years later. (https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/iran-coup/)

This history makes clear that the devastation and violence of Trump's imperialist war on Iran is 100% doomed to fail to bring about any positive changes whatsoever for the Iranian people. Instead there will be untold suffering, bloodshed, terror, destruction, and death. My heart aches for the Iranians and for all whose suffering and trauma will continue unabated and be exasperated by the criminal decisions of Trump and Netanyahu. War is NOT the answer! War is not peace. War is terrorism. — Molly

Mohammad Mossadegh. Source: Public domain.

After nationalizing the oil industry Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh was overthrown in a coup orchestrated by the CIA and British intelligence. We speak with Stephen Kinzer author of All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup And The Roots of Middle East Terror and Baruch College professor Ervand Abrahamian. [Includes transcript]

Click here to read to full transcript This month marks the 50th anniversary of America’s first overthrow of a democratically-elected government in the Middle East.

In 1953, the CIA and British intelligence orchestrated a coup d’etat that toppled the democratically elected government of Iran. The government of Mohammad Mossadegh. The aftershocks of the coup are still being felt.

In 1951 Prime Minister Mossadegh roused Britain’s ire when he nationalized the oil industry. Mossadegh argued that Iran should begin profiting from its vast oil reserves which had been exclusively controlled by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The company later became known as British Petroleum (BP).

After considering military action, Britain opted for a coup d’état. President Harry Truman rejected the idea, but when Dwight Eisenhower took over the White House, he ordered the CIA to embark on one of its first covert operations against a foreign government.

The coup was led by an agent named Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of President Theodore Roosevelt. The CIA leaned on a young, insecure Shah to issue a decree dismissing Mossadegh as prime minister. Kermit Roosevelt had help from Norman Schwarzkopf’s father: Norman Schwarzkopf.

The CIA and the British helped to undermine Mossadegh’s government through bribery, libel, and orchestrated riots. Agents posing as communists threatened religious leaders, while the US ambassador lied to the prime minister about alleged attacks on American nationals.

Some 300 people died in firefights in the streets of Tehran.

Mossadegh was overthrown, sentenced to three years in prison followed by house arrest for life.

The crushing of Iran’s first democratic government ushered in more than two decades of dictatorship under the Shah, who relied heavily on US aid and arms. The anti-American backlash that toppled the Shah in 1979 shook the whole region and helped spread Islamic militancy.

After the 1979 revolution President Jimmy Carter allowed the deposed Shah into the U.S. Fearing the Shah would be sent back to take over Iran as he had been in 1953, Iranian militants took over the U.S. embassy–where the 1953 coup was staged–and held hundreds hostage.

The 50th anniversary of the coup was front-page news in Iranian newspapers. The Christian Science Monitor reports one paper in Iran publishing excerpts from CIA documents on the coup, which were released only three years ago.

The U.S. involvement in the fall of Mossadegh was not publicly acknowledged until three years ago. In a New York Times article in March 2000, then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright admitted that “the coup was clearly a setback for Iran’s political development. And it is easy to see now why many Iranians continue to resent this intervention by America in their internal affairs.”

In his book All the Shah’s Men, Kinzer argues that “[i]t is not far-fetched to draw a line from Operation Ajax [the name of the coup] through the Shah’s repressive regime and the Islamic Revolution to the fireballs that engulfed the World Trade Center in New York.”

  • Stephen Kinzer, author All the Shah’s Men, An American Coup And The Roots of Middle East Terror
  • Prof. Ervand Abrahamian, Middle East and Iran Expert at Baruch College, City University of New York . Author of numerous book including Khomeinism: Essays on the Islamic Republic (University of California Press, 1993).

  • For the full program and transcript, please go here: https://www.democracynow.org/2003/8/25/50_years_after_the_cias_first

A US History of Regime Change In Iran Dating Back To 1953

Any American trying to understand the geopolitics of the Middle East needs to know the story of Moussadgh. Iran had democracy and it was taken away from them by the US. Let’s not hide behind some freedom flag while we bomb innocent children. — Molly

On Aug. 19, 1953, Iranian Premier Mohammad Mossadegh was removed from power in a coup organized and financed by the British and U.S. governments. The Shah quickly returned to take power and signed over forty percent of Iran’s oil fields to U.S. companies.
Here is a description of this historic event from “50 Years After the CIA’s First Overthrow of a Democratically Elected Foreign Government We Take a Look at the 1953 US Backed Coup in Iran” on Democracy Now! (https://www.democracynow.org/2003/8/25/50_years_after_the_cias_first).
In 1953, the CIA and British intelligence orchestrated a coup d’etat that toppled the democratically elected government of Iran. The government of Mohammad Mossadegh. The aftershocks of the coup are still being felt.
In 1951 Prime Minister Mossadegh roused Britain’s ire when he nationalized the oil industry. Mossadegh argued that Iran should begin profiting from its vast oil reserves which had been exclusively controlled by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The company later became known as British Petroleum (BP).
After considering military action, Britain opted for a coup d’état. President Harry Truman rejected the idea, but when Dwight Eisenhower took over the White House, he ordered the CIA to embark on one of its first covert operations against a foreign government.
SOURCE: