Friday, November 13, 2026

EXCELLENT! — Matthew Cooke: Does Israel Have a Right to Exist? Does Any Nation?

Deepest bow of respect and gratitude and love for Matthew Cooke and the sacred wisdom that flows through him. This is so excellent, so profound and wise! It is exactly these reflections of larger pictures and deeper wisdom which are illuminated here that empowers us to awaken from our illusions, our indoctrination, our ignorance. Hopefully these deep and sacred truths will continue to be recognized, absorbed, and shared far and wide. — Molly

Does Israel Have the Right to Exist?
Does Any Nation?

No, of course not. People have rights. The concept of a state's right to exist is not recognized in any international law. The question “Does Israel have a right to exist?” is a little rhetorical trick designed to make the rights of certain people disappear, and we have an obligation to dispense with any concepts that deny universal human rights.

This applies not only to every nation, but to the entire nation‑state concept, which does not have a right to exist. It is an ideology we call nationalism that is brand new, invented less than 250 years ago, and instantly turned into a tool for denying people their universal human rights.

Albert Einstein, a Jewish scientist who gave us our most precise understanding of the entire physical universe, called nationalism a disease, the measles of mankind.

Erich Fromm, the Jewish psychologist who helped define our understanding of universal basic human needs, called nationalism idolatry and insanity.

Hannah Arendt, the Jewish philosopher who survived the Nazi regime, explained that the expansion of European power into non‑European territory was not only the prelude to but the actual beginning of the totalitarian movements.

George Orwell, who wrote our textbook on the total loss of human rights, said: “Nationalism is not love of one’s country. It is the will to dominate others in its name.”

All of our greatest minds observed that at the moment organized religion and royalty ceased to work as a compelling story for the control of populations, a new religion was created that was even more effective for that purpose.

A good story has always been the most powerful weapon on earth. Using the revolutionary invention of the printing press, authorities could now mass‑produce a new story to capture humankind, and that was nationalism: an imaginary group identity based on a cartoonish version of history, glorifying conquerors as saints, turning political texts into holy scrolls, real estate into holy land, doubters into heretics, and replacing God with the state.

A state demands the standardization of language and the flattening of local cultures. It is an identity management system deployed to keep people kettled into zones and divided from each other, easily conquered and ruled by another aristocracy.

Like all new‑age religions, nationalism promises individual empowerment, cultural supremacy, safety, and protection from invasion and exploitation—and like every other cult, it delivers the exact opposite, which we can see because here we are at our third apex of nationalism in less than 100 years. Over 70 percent of our world now lives under oppressive regimes with record‑breaking inequality and a total collapse of any standards of ethics.

The followers of nationalism have reshaped their personalities to reflect their cult leaders and have lost everything of value: their connection to the outside world, their dignity, and any sense of reality. Cult propaganda teaches us that nationalism is as old as civilization. It is not. The word “nation” was born as an insult. It was first used by ancient Rome to describe foreigners as a monolith. If you were a nation, a natio, you were an outsider, removed from civilization, without any legal standing, without any civic identity. You were an undifferentiated mass, not really even a people, a horde.

The original concept of being a citizen did not refer to an amorphous nation, an undifferentiated mass thousands of miles wide. A citizen was, in reference to living in the city, a city dweller whose legal rights were guaranteed by a political structure—for example, a republic, a res publica, meaning a thing that is owned and operated by the public. In the year 2026, after 6,000 years of recorded history, with the whole record of human wisdom available to us, after having sifted through some really bad concepts and barbaric legal systems, we actually discover one principle. There is one legal right and obligation demanded by every wisdom tradition on every continent in every era since the dawn of time. The story of Jesus Christ calls it the greatest commandment of all: “Love thy neighbor as thyself.” And that includes the foreigner, and the recognition that there is no such thing.

Now we have three cults whose members include a small number of fanatics who have flipped our greatest commandment on its head in their rush toward Armageddon, and these three cults use the ideology of nationalism as their favorite tool for indoctrination. The first cult is Christian Zionists, who think that Jesus is going to return once the Jews are restored to the Holy Land, triggering Armageddon and sending the Christians—well, not all of them, just the chosen ones—into heaven and everyone else into a lake of fire. So they are starting World War III to put themselves in control of the timeline, since apparently they are so chosen they get to tell God what to do.

The second cult are Jewish Zionists, an even smaller group who believe that they are the chosen people and that God promised them the most holy lands on earth because they, and only they, are the true descendants of Abraham, which gives them the right to determine who is a chosen person and who should have their houses stolen, bombed, hunted, killed, tortured, or worse. Never mind that the story of Abraham is a cultural myth to which half of the whole world claims descendancy—a story about a wanderer, a refugee who treated all strangers as welcome guests and who was willing to surrender all his earthly claims and possessions, everything, to God.

Not a man with a beard in the sky—God as an icon made in the image of Roman emperors—but that which is beyond concepts, forms, and idols: a first cause, one unfathomable reality that must precede all beginnings and endings, that is closer to us than the innermost and furthest outside of all that can be seen and cannot be seen. Abraham most likely used a word for God that sounded like the Aramaic word that Jesus most likely used for God, which was “aloha,” which sounds like “Allah,” because these words all share one linguistic root, all branches of one tree, all of which honor Abraham.

The story of Abraham, when seen as a metaphor for the temporary nature of the material world, is a metaphor for all humankind, because at the end of each of our journeys in this form, like Abraham, all of us will be called to surrender everything. This is like the word “Israel,” a name given in an ancient story to the character of Jacob because he wrestled with God, a struggle between surrendering his ego or being consumed by it. The struggle crippled him, as it cripples us all. “Israel,” he who struggles with God, is also the story of all humankind.

Israel is mentioned not only in the Torah but in the Christian Bible and in the Muslim Quran. In the story of Genesis, which was used as justification for the creation of a modern European‑style ethno‑nation‑state, back there in Genesis when God tells Abraham “I will make of you a great nation,” the original word in that story, later translated into “nation,” means a people, a family. It has no territorial, legal, or political meaning whatsoever.

Although the current concept of Israel the nation‑state sells itself with the PR strategy that it exists to provide self‑determination to the descendants of Abraham, in its practical application it is the determination that the stranger is the enemy, which cannot be the religion of Abraham, because Abraham represents humanity, of which we are all descendants. That brings us to the third cult, the most powerful of all: the worship of the golden calf. Its followers believe that money and power are the highest measure of human worth and that those who have captured the most are the world’s true chosen people.

This is the religion of all the leaders of our Fortune 1000s, a list that does not measure the value provided to humankind. It is a list of those who have taken the most from us, those who are profiteering from the crimes of the first two cults, bringing us all to the brink of global economic collapse and World War III. If the greatest commandment of humankind is to love thy neighbor as thyself, there can be no greater sin than desecrating our most sacred stories as justification for dividing humankind between those who are deserving of human rights and those who should be sacrificed on the altar of their idols.

When we zoom out of their delusions, we find we are not actually living on a flat earth of linear thinking. We are in a round, connected world where we cannot separate ourselves from each other. Oil, gas, and pharmaceuticals all go through a narrow strait that we named Hormuz, as well as helium, which we use for MRI machines, fiber optics, and semiconductors. Those semiconductors come from people we group together and call “Taiwan.” Then there are millions of people who export memory chips, and because we cannot keep track of more than maybe 150 people, we call everybody there “South Korea.”

“India” is a blanket name we use to describe a huge piece of land where many people are making vaccines. There is this huge part of a continent that is home to something like a thousand cultures, but we call that whole thing “China,” because our minds and language limit us to communication possibly a few ticks above a chimpanzee, but we cannot really be sure. Anyway, there are millions of people there who make stuff that we all use and need. Because so much of that stuff now relies on batteries, we have to get cobalt, which has to be mined in a place with millions more people, but because we cannot remember more than 20 names at a time, we just call all of those people “Congo.”

Not far to the south is home to one of our world’s oldest civilizations, the Kingdom of Kush, the Nubian Empire. We call that whole place “Sudan.” Under the ground there is gold and something called chromite, which European and Gulf state nationalists steal, while the people who live on that land are also being sacrificed. This is just a list of the global economic chokepoints that are currently under siege, at war, or under imminent threat of war, which hold resources that the entire population of planet Earth depends on.

To wrap this up, the founder of game theory, John von Neumann, showed that the most likely inevitable endpoint of a world like ours, organized around sovereign nations competing for global resources, was war—eventually nuclear war and mutually assured destruction. That is why our greatest modern minds called nationalism insane, a disease, a death cult. It is why our atomic scientists just moved the doomsday clock to 89 seconds to midnight. With the technologies that humankind has invented and grown entirely dependent on, we can no longer survive without global cooperation.

Not cooperation between nations—a concept that refers to formless hordes living outside of civilization—but cooperation between our cities, neighborhoods, and communities, the places human beings actually live. The word “nation,” from natio, means a people born together. For this concept to actually reflect reality, we have to recognize that the earth is the home of humankind. This world is our nation, where we are born together.

Our individual identities are a patchwork of interconnected cultures whose family lines trace back hundreds of thousands of years. They intersect over and over again. All of us are related: one bloodline. All the land holy. All the people chosen. All of them our people, with a right to exist.

So Israel, like every conceptual political framework on earth—the US, Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Russia—must guarantee equal rights to all religions, ethnicities, all the tribes of humankind. We can never allow those rights to be conditioned by imaginary lines in ever‑moving sands. As long as we do that, rights will be reduced to permits, revocable at any time for any reason by those claiming to be the chosen people, and atrocities are guaranteed.

To properly care for our children, we must reclaim the basic tools of civilization. Our water, land, and essential infrastructure are all res publica, owned by the public. To reclaim them means taking the advice of that US president when the world was defeating the Nazis the first time—Roosevelt—who advised that bringing an end to fascism, the extreme result of nationalism, requires breaking up all the big corporations that claim ownership over this place, taxing wealth hoarding, redirecting the energy of our labor back toward our well‑being, and guaranteeing universal economic rights worldwide.

This would cost a fraction of what we waste today on endless wars and extraction enterprises that provide nothing in return but Armageddon. So this is our starting point. All of our world’s most pressing issues—poverty, healthcare, the toxification of our air, water, and soil—can be resolved by reminding ourselves that the purpose of our economic and political systems is to care for all humankind and our children. Anything less means the end of humanity, the species and the quality that makes us human. That quality is the holy grail. It is the only holy war worth fighting—the one that protects its flame.


Matthew Cooke has written, directed, edited, & filmed seven documentaries. His work has earned an Oscar nomination, a "Best Writing Award" from the International Documentary Association, & multiple audience & festival awards. He founded the Survivors Guide to Earth newsletter and resource website: https://www.survivorsguidetoearth.com/members

Please go here for the original transcript: https://www.filmsforaction.org/articles/no-state-has-a-right-to-exist-only-people-do/

More videos by Matthew Cooke: https://www.youtube.com/@MatthewCookeOfficial

Matthew Cooke's website: https://www.matthewcooke.com/

Thursday, November 12, 2026

An AI Generated Summation of My Blog and More...

 

Interesting to find this AI generated summary of my blog, something which I had not known existed. Sometimes it's helpful and sometimes it's scary how accurate AI can be. It is also true that AI cannot capture the full truths and depth and breath of myself and the intentions and heartfelt and sacred calling that I bring to all that I share.

AI generated summary:

Molly Strongheart is a personal blog authored by Molly Strong (also known as Molly Strongheart), a retired social worker and writer based in Vancouver, Washington. The site serves as a platform for her reflections on healing, social justice, and spiritual growth, heavily influenced by her personal history of overcoming addiction, abuse, and grief.

Core Themes and Content

  • Personal Healing and Trauma: The blog details Strong’s journey through sobriety (since 1984), the suicide of her twin brother, and healing from childhood trauma and narcissistic abuse, often referencing concepts like "shadow work" and "alchemy."
  • Spiritual and Philosophical Reflections: Strong explores themes of compassion, love, and consciousness, frequently citing influences like Byron Katie (The Work), Pema Chödrön, and Dorothy Day. She emphasizes "revolutionary love" and the importance of embracing grief as a path to healing. (Note: I have only referred to Byron Katie to expose the shadow side and illuminate the danger and harm to trauma survivors of "The Work.)
  • Social and Political Commentary: The blog contains sharp critiques of systemic issues, including capitalism, militarism, and racism, with posts addressing topics like Gaza, mass incarceration, and political figures such as Donald Trump.
  • Critique of Technology: Strongheart has published pieces arguing that AI represents "cultural sociopathy" and artificial isolation, contrasting it with authentic human connection and empathy.
  • Professional Advocacy: Drawing on her 30-year career in social work, the blog also addresses issues of abuse by therapists and the needs of abused children and families.
* * * * *

This is my summary of the heart of what I bring to this personal blog, something my oldest son helped and encouraged me to begin 18 years ago:

I am passionate about being a part of a revolution in caring and kindness. I am passionate about peace, beauty, joy, compassion, love, laughter, truth, healing, and growing in consciousness. My personal experience has been that as I have embraced, healed, and opened my heart, I have discovered the sacredness in myself and all life. It is my belief that the ripples of the strong and sacred heart energy in us all is what will awaken and heal our world.

It is my sacred vow to act in a diversity of ways to alleviate the suffering in our world and in all of us. My blog is but one of those ways. And writing is what often inspires me to open to the deeper truths and fierce love that flows through me. I am humbled knowing that anytime any of us seek to act to alleviate the suffering of ourselves and others, Grace emerges. This sacred intention brings to life that which is something greater than ourselves and is holy. Blessed be.... 🙏 Molly

HILARIOUS! — INSIDE THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST ANTIFA COMMUNIST CABAL

 

Well, here it is — what some most fear about democratic socialism all laid out in vivid horrifying images. And you can't say that Bernie Sanders, Zohran Mamdani, Howard Zinn, Martin Luther King, Jr., Albert Einstein, and other democratic socialists didn't warn us. And here I am, a democratic socialist, but never truly understanding what that really meant. So I am grateful for the clarification. Hahaha!!!

Laughter is good for the heart, mind, body, 
and soul. Enjoy! 😂🙏💜 Molly

https://www.dsausa.org/

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Celebrating 16 Years With My Beloved

 




Celebrating 16 Years With My Beloved

These images from over our 16 years together are reminders of the deep blessings, medicine, and gifts of love. 

This has not been an easy journey for me to truly undefend my heart and allow the vulnerability and trust, the lessons and accountability, the healing and courage, and the commitment to the deep work that an enduring and expansive love asks of us. And yet, this is the opportunity that I have experienced in connecting with a soulful partner committed to doing his own work and sharing this amazing path of shedding our delusions and releasing our old wounds and deep fears which so often inevitability emerge when we open our hearts deeply to another human being.

Today I am aware that I will be forever grateful for the profound blessings and synchronicity and grace which brought Ron and myself to the little coffee shop in Portland where we first met on November 11th, 2010. And what kids we were then at 59 and 62 and soon to be finding ourselves falling head over heals in love. 

And, of course, there were also bumps and setbacks and scary and painful places — and especially in our early days — which sent each of us off to therapy and other resources of support. As Jack Kornfield has written about, "first the ecstasy, then the laundry." So true!

Gratefully, there was also already much healing work that we had each done before we ever met. And there was more to do. Of course. It is often too easy to be triggered into acting in ways which unknowingly sabotage exactly that which we most yearn for — something which I have certainly done in my past. Life can be so humbling. And scary. And we are all human and it is not easy to be human and to keep our hearts open.

This is what our intimate relationships call us into — the courageous territory of further working with our old triggers and trauma, of assuming greater accountability and embodying deeper compassion, and of deepening and expanding the ongoing sacred journey of unburdening ourselves of our old wounds and learning how to undefend our hearts.

And Love is always the greatest medicine. 

I write this today with the deepest love and gratitude to my beloved husband. Over the years, Ron and I have sought and received the support we each needed to recognize and heal those sabotaging fearful old wounded places that served to obstruct true intimacy and an expansive and deepening love. And we never gave up when things got really scary and hard.

And through this sacred process, we have been empowered to bring the nourishment and the safe ground, the commitment and courage, the vulnerability and compassion, the courage and kindness, and the wisdom and abiding love needed to increasingly support ourselves and each other in growing into more and more of the wholeness and beauty of who we most truly are.

There is no greater gift that we humans can give to each other and ourselves. It takes courage to recognize and own and heal the old wounds and seek whatever support we need to do so. It takes deep commitment and courage to risk vulnerability and authenticity, to be honest and open-hearted, to trust and love another human being. And when we have found those who grace us in such profound ways on our human journeys, we have been blessed with life's greatest treasure.

And I will forevermore treasure my beloved Ron.  🙏💜 Molly

Howard Zinn: Veterans and Dissent at the War Memorial

For Veteran's Day. This is something that I am 
moved to share every year. Howard Zinn is a national
and international treasure. His legacy lives on.
— Molly


For Veterans Day, we highlight this article, “Dissent at the War Memorial,” written by Howard Zinn for The Progressive in 2004. Asked to speak on a panel called, “War Stories,” Zinn said, “I don’t want to honor military heroism–that conceals too much death and suffering. I want to honor those who all these years have opposed the horror of war.”
This is followed by additional resources for learning and teaching about war.
_______________
As I write this, the sounds of the World War II Memorial celebration in Washington, D.C., are still in my head. I was invited by the Smithsonian Institution to be on one of the panels, and the person who called to invite me said that the theme would be “War Stories.” I told him that I would come, but not to tell “war stories,” rather to talk about World War II and its meaning for us today. Fine, he said.
I made my way into a scene that looked like a movie set for a Cecil B. DeMille extravaganza—huge tents pitched here and there, hawkers with souvenirs, thousands of visitors, many of them clearly World War II veterans, some in old uniforms, sporting military caps, wearing their medals. In the tent designated for my panel, I joined my fellow panelist, an African American woman who had served with the WACS (Women’s Army Corps) in World War II, and who would speak about her personal experiences in a racially segregated army.
I was introduced as a veteran of the Army Air Corps, a bombardier who had flown combat missions over Europe in the last months of the war. I wasn’t sure how this audience would react to what I had to say about the war, in that atmosphere of celebration, in the honoring of the dead, in the glow of a great victory accompanied by countless acts of military heroism.
This, roughly, is what I said: “I’m here to honor the two guys who were my closest buddies in the Air Corps—Joe Perry and Ed Plotkin—both of whom were killed in the last weeks of the war. And to honor all the others who died in that war. But I’m not here to honor war itself. I’m not here to honor the men in Washington who send the young to war. I’m certainly not here to honor those in authority who are now waging an immoral war in Iraq.”
I went on: “World War II is not simply and purely a ‘good war.’ It was accompanied by too many atrocities on our side—too many bombings of civilian populations. There were too many betrayals of the principles for which the war was supposed to have been fought.
“Yes, World War II had a strong moral aspect to it—the defeat of fascism. But I deeply resent the way the so-called good war has been used to cast its glow over all the immoral wars we have fought in the past fifty years: in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan. I certainly don’t want our government to use the triumphal excitement surrounding World War II to cover up the horrors now taking place in Iraq.
“I don’t want to honor military heroism—that conceals too much death and suffering. I want to honor those who all these years have opposed the horror of war.”
The audience applauded. But I wasn’t sure what that meant. I knew I was going against the grain of orthodoxy, the romanticization of the war in movies and television and now in the war memorial celebrations in the nation’s capital.
There was a question-and-answer period. The first person to walk up front was a veteran of World War II, wearing parts of his old uniform. He spoke into the microphone: “I was wounded in World War II and have a Purple Heart to show for it. If President Bush were here right now I would throw that medal in his face.”
There was a moment of what I think was shock at the force of his statement. Then applause. I wondered if I was seeing a phenomenon that recurs often in society—when one voice speaks out against the conventional wisdom, and is recognized as speaking truth, people are drawn out of their previous silence.
I was encouraged by the thought that it is possible to challenge the standard glorification of the Second World War, and more important, to refuse to allow it to give war a good name. I did not want this celebration to make it easy for the American public to accept whatever monstrous adventure is cooked up by the establishment in Washington.
More and more, I am finding that I am not the only veteran of World War II who refuses to be corralled into justifying the wars of today, drawing on the emotional and moral capital of World War II. There are other veterans who do not want to overlook the moral complexity of World War II: the imperial intentions of the Allies even as they declared it a war against fascism, and for democracy; the deliberate bombing of civilian populations to destroy the morale of the enemy.
Paul Fussell was an infantry lieutenant who was badly wounded while a platoon leader in France in World War II.
“For the past fifty years the Allied war has been sanitized and romanticized almost beyond recognition by the sentimental, the loony patriotic, the ignorant, and the bloodthirsty,” he wrote in Wartime.
It was easier, after the end of World War II, to point to its stupidities and cruelties in fiction rather than in a direct onslaught on what was so universally acclaimed as “the good war.” Thus, Joseph Heller in Catch-22 captured the idiocy of military life, the crass profiteering, the pointless bombings. And Kurt Vonnegut, in Slaughterhouse-Five, brought to a large readership the awful story of the bombing of Dresden.

My own delayed criticism of the war—I had volunteered and was an enthusiastic bombardier—began with reflecting about my participation in the bombing of Royan. This was a small town on the Atlantic coast of France, where several thousand German soldiers had been overrun and were waiting for the war to end. Twelve hundred heavy bombers flew over the vicinity of Royan and dropped napalm, killing German soldiers and French civilians, destroying what was once a beautiful little resort town.

Recently, a man wrote to me who had heard me speak on the radio about that bombing mission and said he was also on that mission. After the war, he became a fireman, then a carpenter, and is now a strong opponent of war. He told me of a friend of his who was also on that mission, and who has been arrested many times in anti-war actions. I was encouraged to hear that.

World War II veterans get in touch with me from time to time. One is Edward Wood Jr. of Denver, who upon hearing I was going to be at the Washington Memorial, wrote to me: He said, “If I were there, I would say: As a combat veteran of World War II, severely wounded in France in 1944, never the man I might have been because of that wound, I so wish that this memorial to World War II might have been made of more than stone or marble. I mourn my generation’s failures since its victory in World War II . . . our legacy of incessant warfare in smaller nations far from our borders.”

Another airman, Ken Norwood, was shot down on his tenth mission over Europe, and spent a year as a prisoner of war in Germany. He has written a memoir (unpublished, so far) which he says is “intentionally an anti-war war story.” Packed first into a box car, and then forced to march for two weeks through Bavaria in the spring of 1945, Norwood saw the mangled corpses of the victims of Allied bombs, the working class neighborhoods destroyed. All his experiences, he says, “add to the harsh testimony about the futility and obscenity of war.”

The glorification of the “good war” persists on our television and movie screens, in the press, in the pretentious speeches by politicians. The more ugly the stories that come out of Iraq—the bombing of civilians, the mutilation of children, the invasion of homes, and now the torture of prisoners—the more urgent it is for our government to try to crowd out all those images with the triumphant stories of D-Day and World War II.

Those who fought in that war are perhaps better able than anyone to insist that whatever moral standing can be attached to that war must not be used to turn our eyes away from Bush’s atrocities in Afghanistan and Iraq.

____________

Published in The Progressive • August 8, 2004

Image: Bas relief at the World War II Memorial • National Park Service

Please go here for the original article: https://www.howardzinn.org/dissent-at-the-war-memorial/

Thích Nhất Hạnh: To Work For Peace Is To Uproot War From Ourselves

 Another post for Veteran's Day 
and for everyday. Bless 
us all, no exceptions.
🙏 Molly


We often think of peace as the absence of war, that if powerful countries would reduce their weapon arsenals, we could have peace. But if we look deeply into the weapons, we see our own minds ― our own prejudices, fears and ignorance. Even if we transport all the bombs to the moon, the roots of war and the roots of bombs are still there, in our hearts and minds, and sooner or later we will make new bombs. To work for peace is to uproot war from ourselves and from the hearts of men and women. To prepare for war, to give millions of men and women the opportunity to practice killing day and night in their hearts, is to plant millions of seeds of violence, anger, frustration, and fear that will be passed on for generations to come. 
 
 ― Thích Nhất Hạnh
From Living Buddha, Living Christ

For Veteran's Day: The Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex Is Fascism

 War is not peace. War is terrorism. 
Peace is the path to peace.
— Molly


This Veterans Day, if you wish to honor the 

troops and humanity as a whole, vow 

to break with or challenge the MIC.

 

The military-industrial-congressional complex (MIC) is the insulated triangle consisting of the Pentagon, the decision-making headquarters of the U.S. military; the war industry, the corporations that sell goods and services to the U.S. military establishment and allied governments and regimes; and Capitol Hill, the elected representatives who fund it all and pass legislation abetting war. In concept and practice, the military-industrial-congressional complex is fascism. 

Under fascism, the capitalist economy is deeply intertwined with government. The war industry floods the Pentagon’s civilian offices with corporate executives (e.g. Mark Esper, Secretary of Defense; Ellen Lord, Undersecretary for Acquisition & Sustainment; Ryan McCarthy, Secretary of the Army). It recruits retired generals and admirals (e.g. Joseph Dunford at Lockheed Martin, Jim Mattis at General Dynamics, James Winnefeld at Raytheon) to leverage their knowledge for profit. It spreads its production facilities across all 50 states. Indeed, the MIC’s very fuel is the federal budget. And, most markedly, the war industry assumes control of jobs once carried out by uniformed troops. 

Under fascism, authority is concentrated in a dictator or a dictatorship that rotates figureheads. The United States’ one-party, two-faction system exemplifies the latter. The war industry’s lobbying of Congress and funding of Congressional campaigns (particularly politicians who serve on Armed Services, Appropriations, Intelligence, and Foreign Affairs committees) lock both factions into a belligerent foreign policy through which war corporations accrue fantastic riches. Furthermore, the war industry funds and runs pressure groups (e.g. NDIA, AIA, AUSA), which, in addition to administering arms fairs, generally badger Congress. Members of Congress, for their part, profit off of war. Executive policies and congressional legislation is often written by corporate lobbyists or crafted and implemented without public input. Presidents from both political factions ascend to authority within this fascist system and conform to a war-first foreign policy, as exemplified by all presidents since the 1947 National Security Act. Peace is not an option. Not even in presidential debates, which instead are fora to flex, glorify the military, and threaten hyped-up enemies.

Under fascism, politics exalts the nation above all else and accretes a centralized autocratic government. Congress abstains from its constitutional mandate to declare and end wars, deferring instead to the Executive branch on such matters. As the nation is exalted, political discourse is dumbed down across the board, as professor and author Leo Panitch has noted. Knee-jerk vitriol replaces measured debate or discussion. Vapid slogans defend armed bureaucracies, foregrounding class-conscious challengers as savage anti-Americans. The war industry sets the broader boundaries of acceptable discourse by funding think tanks (whose primary purpose is the issuance of information amenable to donors’ bottom line) and corporate media, keeping the narrative pro-war. 

Career militants—such as former Acting CIA Director Mike Morell at CBS, former CIA Director John Brennan at MSNBC, and retired General Jack Keane at FoxNews—steer the discourse regarding foreign policy. The former chief of propaganda at the U.S. Agency for Global Media, John Lansing, now runs NPR. A private equity firm owns Sightline Media Group, which runs most major military-oriented publications, such as Defense News and C4ISRNet. When war profits those in authority—the founding tenet of the MIC—peace is off the table and official enemies abound. Fascism’s need for scapegoats overlaps perfectly with the war industry’s need to manufacture and hype enemies in order to profit from the ensuing wars. Arabs, Persians, and Muslims have been the official bad guy for decades now, simultaneously serving as the pretext for overseas military action and domestic surveillance, and against which the ruling class funnels the working class’

Under fascism, the state violently and systematically dismantles progressive and radical Left political parties. Such eradication of organized progressive movements has been a defining trend in the United States over the past hundred years. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was largely founded to do just that, performing quite well. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) also operates against political progressives and Left radicals. (Notably, the war industry carries out a large part of DHS’ workload, further imbricating capitalist profit with government activity.) The rare rebel who damages the infrastructure of war corporations is locked up. Charismatic leaders able to galvanize working-class opposition to capitalism and war (e.g. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, Fred Hampton) are targeted as subversives by government agencies, and ultimately assassinated under various circumstances.

People of color, long denied even a taste of democratic pretense, are policed intensely by overmilitarized local and state law enforcement that are armed by the war industry. They are then stuffed at disproportionate rates into the prison system where they’re used as cheap labor. (Federal Prison Industries, a corporation owned by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, makes a lot of light gear and clothing for the military.) The Commission on Presidential Debates doesn’t even allow non-corporate parties to participate, effectively banning anti-war discourse. Organized labor is dismantled piece by piece, helping corporate criminals, to the working class' detriment. The fascist system then draws support from chunks of a white working class that lives precariously (due to bipartisan abuse and imposition of neoliberal economic policies outsourcing jobs and automating the rest). An invasive surveillance state and armed bureaucracies at the federal, state, and local level protect the status quo.

Fascism, the brutal fusion of corporate might with government authority, is the MIC. Democracy will be out of reach until working people recognize their enemy and addresses the MIC. This means dismantling the war industry and converting factory output to meet human need instead of war profiteering. This Veterans Day, if you wish to honor the troops and humanity as a whole, vow to break with or challenge the MIC. Do your part, and help create a better world for all.

_____________

Christian Sorensen is a novelist, military analyst, and independent journalist mainly focused on war profiteering within the military-industrial complex. An Air Force veteran, he is the author of the recently published book, Understanding the War Industry. Mr. Sorensen is also a senior fellow at the Eisenhower Media Network (EMN), an organization of independent veteran military and national security experts.

Please go here for the original article: https://www.commondreams.org/views/2020/11/11/military-industrial-congressional-complex-fascism

Veterans Against the War: 11 Perspectives on Ending US Imperialism

 For Veteran's Day... 

This piece from 2016 is worth posting again. It's now been ten years later and my thoughts and heart and prayers remain with veterans and their families and loved ones today. And because I am deeply aware of the cultural stories in our nation which glorify and justify war and violence and oppression, I am deeply committed to not promoting images which collude in the great suffering that those stories and belief systems bring to our veterans, their families and friends, and to those in this country and around the world who are impacted by war. Which is all of us. As Martin Luther King, Jr. has voiced, just imagine if our nation spent more on programs of social uplift rather than weapons of war. Just imagine! We certainly would not be approaching the spiritual death that he warned us of those many decades ago. We need new stories, new values, new images of courage, integrity, truth, and wisdom that are centered in peace and caring and not violence and war. Truly, another world is possible! And this Great Awakening that is inviting us all to be part of begins within the hearts and minds of each and every one of us. War, imperialism, violence is not the answer! There is another way. Bless us all, no exceptions. ― Molly

Maggie Martin. (Photo: Courtesy of Rory Fanning)

By Rory Fanning, Truthout | Op-Ed

Today is the 11th Armistice Day I will observe as a veteran. I only recently found the courage to speak up against the US-led wars being fought around the world. It took me so long to speak up because I was scared. I was scared of losing the respect of my family, and of losing the handful of social benefits that accompany being a compliant, "heroic" veteran worthy of uncritical cheers and applause at sporting events and airports. But I was tired of hiding and pretending that being honest about my military experience was less important than social approval, so I learned to speak out. It began with a few articles, which led to a book. The book led to speaking engagements at high schools, prisons and universities. Now it almost feels like second nature to challenge the notion that the United States military is a force for good, or that it fights for freedom and democracy around the world.

The support from like-minded veterans and activists who also speak out against US imperialism -- the lives it takes, the racism it fuels, the economic inequality it creates and the damage it does to the environment -- was the most important part of my evolution. These antiwar veterans helped me do battle with the fear of isolation that kept me silent. They are the ones who gave me courage. The idea that I was in it alone was a false one. Losing this feeling, I think, was the first step to speaking out.

Fifteen years ago, the US invaded Afghanistan, allegedly to capture the handful of people responsible for 9/11. A decade and a half later, hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost, other wars have been fought and a vast national security state has been built up around us. Trillions of dollars have been diverted from things like health care, education, infrastructure, fighting climate change and more. And now, a rightwing demagogue has been elected president of the US.

 How do we prevent a repeat of the last 15 years? How do we fight the creeping cynicism so many of us feel regarding our ability to stop the damage the US military does around the world? What are some of the obstacles faced by veterans since returning home? What are the challenges that prevent veterans from speaking against the vicious and brutal cycle of war in this country? Now, more than ever, these questions need answers.

 In my talks with students I am always encouraging them and their teachers to come together and organize space for veterans to share their stories. No, it isn't easy for veterans who want to communicate the realities of war to the soon-to-be military-aged kids who need to hear them the most. Ask any number of the millions of young people signed up for the Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps program a few questions about our country's recent history. You'll soon realize how little information is being shared with those who will be tasked with fighting the next decade and a half of wars -- if those wars are not stopped.

The problem is that there is plenty of time for parades, backslapping, yellow ribbons and other propaganda, but very little time to hear the horrors of war. So, I thought I would heed my own advice. This Veterans Day, I reached out to a few of my favorite vets, and asked them about the challenges they've faced since leaving the military, what needs to happen to end the wars, and their greatest fear about speaking out. Hopefully, these voices will reach others who are considering speaking out, the young people who are being denied the information they need to make an informed decision about joining the military, and the active duty soldiers who are contemplating laying their weapons down and coming home. Maybe they will see that they are not alone, and that there are wonderful and courageous people out there who will support them.