Saturday, August 22, 2026

Lissa Rankin: What's Wrong With The Power Of Now?

I appreciate and resonate with the wisdom 
of Lissa Rankin. — Molly

Deconstruction Eckhart Tolle, Ram Dass, Byron Katie & Other Presence Teachings Through A Trauma-Informed Social Justice Lens


Be here now. Don’t think about the past or project into the future. Only the present moment is real. Don’t identify with the pain body. Free yourself from your egoic mind by staying in the now. All suffering will go away forever and you’ll never again be triggered if only you stay in the present moment.

How can such teachings be anything but enlightening?

In the wake of the passing of my spiritual teacher and mentor Rachel Naomi Remen, MD, I’ve been thinking even more about what spiritual teachings have stuck for me, which ones no longer make sense, and which ones are somewhere in the middle, where we have the opportunity to parse out what’s helpful with tweezers from a haystick of things that might be not only not helpful, but outright harmful.

In 2015, Rachel and I went into Karen Drucker’s recording studio and recorded hours and hours of content. I was listening to those recordings yesterday, and Rachel led a meditation. I closed my eyes and followed along. Her voice is hynotic, and I can go very deep, very quickly when I hear it. She always says something like “Pay attention to that moment of peace at the end of your out breath.” And I can dive into the depths of my consciousness with a feeling of great peace.

But what Rachel never did is suggest, when I was in an acute trigger, that I should “be here now” or “let go of the past” or “stop thinking about the future.” She could guide me into the now without ever shaming me for having parts ruminating about the past or parts scared about the future.

Obviously, there is great benefit in mindfulness practices that allow us to be more present in the here and now, with less ruminating about things from the past that we cannot change or anxieties about an unknown and uncertain future. Trauma survivors have a tendency to have hurt or scared parts that get stuck in the painful past, as well as catastrophizing, future tripping parts that get anxious about the future. If our minds are so busy that we can’t actually be here in the present moment, we can miss so many of the joys of life that happen in the moment of now.

So, of course, being here now is often a useful teaching, but only if it’s trauma-informed.

It’s important to understand that not everyone has an equally easy time being here now. To suggest that all it takes is the reminder of a cliche can land on others as lacking in empathy and out of touch with lived reality. For untreated, unhealed trauma survivors still stuck reliving the past or for anyone who isn’t actually safe in the here and now because they’re actively getting oppressed, instructing someone to “Be here now” can come off as tone deaf.

Consider the utopian idea that “enlightenment” means that, like Eckhart Tolle and Byron Katie claim to do, you live only in the present moment and don’t get lost in ruminations about the past or anxieties about the future. First, that assumes that you’re safe in the present moment. Because if you’re being targeted for a hate crime in the present moment, if you’re an immigrant in the US right now being chased by ICE, if you’re a woman whose rights are being stripped by Trump America, if you’re a BIPOC male who just got stopped by cops, no amount of being here now is going to stop you from being legitimately scared about the reality of the dangers of such a present moment. Fear would be a legitimate response, informed by the historical knowledge that so many innocent people have been oppressed and murdered and that far too many injustices are real, right here, right now.

Add to this that if you have Complex PTSD from lifelong trauma, whether from a high Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) score, developmental trauma, or collective traumas like being BIPOC or LGBTQIA+ or Jewish or Gazan or an immigrant in America, you’re likely to have frequent emotional flashbacks, even if you don’t have visual ones. Unless you get treatment for all that lifelong trauma, you will be unlikely to be able to mindfully meditate yourself into focusing only on the present moment without dissociating and disembodying, which is a trauma symptom, not enlightenment.

Even if it’s safe in that particular moment, it wasn’t necessarily safe in the past, and it may not be safe again in the future. While these teachings may be very helpful for some, teachers who claim to only live in the perpetual NOW reveal their privilege through such teachings. Not only are they most likely deceiving people—because they’re human and I don’t believe in human enlightenment. It’s also true that not all sentient beings on the planet have the luxury of basking in detached, peaceful, dispassionate equanimity in the bliss of now.

What’s Wrong With The Power of Now?

We can probably all agree that it can be helpful to be more present—here in the now, aware of your emotions, embodied in your flesh, present with your pain, not looping old stories repetitively and not worrying too much about the future. That’s why trauma therapy is so important. Because unless we treat the traumas that all of us have, it’s unavoidable for us to flash into past hurts, regrets, or memories. It’s also normal for us to plan for, worry about, or fantasize about the future. Only when we know how to tend to and be with our past traumas, only when we’re present with the parts of us stuck in the past or concerned about the future without bypassing them, only when our future feels legitimately safe enough, and only when “now” is not dangerous can we truly be in the potential relaxation of the present moment.

But what if your “now” isn’t blissful? What if you’re a legal observer filming an immigrant raid and you’re innocent but getting killed by ICE in the present moment? What if your house is burning in a wildfire and the air is thick with smoke and burning your lungs and eyes? What if your belly is aching from hunger? What if a cop pulls you over for speeding and you wind up in a choke hold in the now? When your life is in danger—as so many lives are right now—now may not be such a happy place.

No amount of meditation is going to make you not scared when your safety is legitimately threatened, not in a healthy human body, anyway. Only people who are dissociating stop feeling real and necessary human emotions, like fear, when their safety is threatened. This is why “be here now” teachings can be confusing and may not be helpful to people whose safety is actually at risk or who have not had the privilege of access to cutting edge trauma therapies often not covered by insurance.

It can be especially confusing and potentially damaging when unintegrated, dissociated “presence teachers” sell the idea that enlightenment means you’ll never be triggered, you’ll never feel pain, suffering is optional, your ego will just die, and all human suffering will cease at that moment and never return. It’s such a lovely fantasy. Who doesn’t want instant enlightenment and the end of pain and suffering forever? Only it’s not true.

It certainly sets up a hierarchy, doesn’t it? The enlightened person is special and all those less special people who feel painful emotions must be in some way inferior. But where’s the empathy or honesty in this? Why would we even want to teach something that positions people who actually feel suffering in their hearts, minds, or bodies as “less than?”

Dissociation Is Not To Be Glorified

I once heard Byron Katie say that she wakes up every day and sees her husband as a brand new human that she doesn’t even recognize, so fresh in the now that he has to introduce himself, like the traumatic brain injury survivor Drew Barrymore does to Adam Sandler in the romantic comedy 50 First Dates. How bewildering to suggest that enlightenment means that you’ll lose your memory of the past or your ability to plan for the future! That’s not enlightenment; that’s the result of severe physical or emotional trauma. While these teachers may not have experienced a traumatic brain injury, they do seem to be experiencing chronic dissociation, which is a severe trauma symptom.

We’ve all heard of the extreme cases of dissociation—the Multiple Personality Disorders (now called Dissociative Identity Disorders) typified by movies like Sybil and The Three Faces of Eve. Yet dissociation happens on a spectrum, and Dissociative Identity Disorder is a rare extreme of the common phenomena of dissociation. At its most benign and basic, dissociation happens to all of us when we’re daydreaming or when we drive somewhere on autopilot and arrive at our destination without really being aware how we got there. We even consciously choose to dissociate when we practice escapism and get absorbed into fiction novels, binge watch Netflix, use consciousness-altering substances like alcohol or marijuana, practice transcendent forms of meditation, or even sometimes when we wind up in flow states. When time/space awareness disappears and you’re fully absorbed in running, making art, making love, or otherwise entering ecstatic realms, that can feel really great. But it can also be a pleasant form of dissociation.

Voluntary dissociation is different than involuntary dissociation, which is a trauma symptom and happens on autopilot, sometimes as a default setting. When this happens, it’s like a switch flips and you disconnect and detach from your sensory experience, your thoughts, your sense of self, your body, your awareness of time, place, and identity, your sense that the world is real and you belong to it, and even your personal history and memories. Dissociation impacts your consciousness, identity, memory, emotions, self-awareness, awareness of your surroundings, and embodiment. You could say that its opposite is a kind of integrated wholeness alive with presence, awareness, sensation, embodiment, emotions, intact critical thinking, a healthy weaving between aspects of your being, and a good strong reality check.

Anytime you’ve had an out of body experience, like a near death experience, a sense of floating above yourself (as might occur during a traumatic event), astral travel, mystical journeying to other realms, meditative experiences when you transcend or leave your body, or even a kind of waking dream state, it’s likely that you’re dissociating. As such, it’s an intelligent strategy that may have helped you survive hard times—or even unbearable or deplorable times, such as childhood physical or sexual abuse or living through wartime.

When your body isn’t a safe place to be or when your emotions are just too intense for your young nervous system to handle, it makes sense that you’d leave your body and go someplace where it doesn’t hurt so much. As a child, you might even become so masterful at dissociating that you reflexively check out that way once you’re an adult. Or you might just dissociate automatically. When you’re dissociated, you don’t tend to feel your painful emotions, you can numb or leave your body, you may not remember bad things that happened to you, and you may even gain access to ecstatic mystical realms that fill you with hormones like oxytocin, endorphins, dopamine, and serotonin, giving you a kind of blissed out (but spaced out) high.

What Is Dissociation?

You might notice that some of the characteristics of dissociation sound remarkably like what spiritual teachers associate with some transcendent state. Notice the similarities of the following characteristics, and then notice how they track with the awakening stories of Byron Katie and Eckhart Tolle, in their own words...

Please go here for the original article: https://lissarankinmd.substack.com/p/be-here-now-unless-now-is-dangerous

Monday, August 10, 2026

Dorothy Vera: Where Gentle Strength Begins

Photo by Molly
Where Gentle Strength Begins

The old ones taught
that power does not always raise its voice.
Sometimes it kneels beside sorrow
and waits until the heart can breathe again.
The earth knows this kind of strength.
She carries every fallen leaf,
every forgotten footprint,
and still makes room for another spring.
I was told that what is sacred
should never be owned—
only honored,
only protected,
only passed forward with clean hands.
So when grief comes,
I do not ask it to leave quickly.
I let it sit near the fire
until it remembers its true name.
For pain, when carried with love,
can become wisdom.
And memory, when held without anger,
can become a path.
One day we all return
to the same quiet ground.
Until then,
may we walk softly,
protect what cannot protect itself,
and leave behind a kindness
strong enough to outlive our names.

Dorothy Vera

Thursday, August 6, 2026

Faisal R. Khan — Statement of Condemnation: Senator Tuberville’s Islamophobic and Anti-Muslim Hate Attack on Abdul El Sayed

 From my friend Faisal Khan. We all must 
stand up against hate, bigotry, racism,
 and dehumanization in all of is forms 
and for truth, justice, kindness, 
caring, compassion, and love.
— Molly




Statement of Condemnation: Senator Tuberville’s Islamophobic and Anti-Muslim Hate Attack on Abdul El Sayed
Senator Tommy Tuberville’s claim that Michigan Democrats “voted to send a TERRORIST to the Senate” is not political criticism. It is bigotry, hate fear mongering speech dressed up as commentary, aimed at a man for one reason: he is Muslim.
Calling a Muslim United States candidate a terrorist and a radical Islamist who wants to “destroy America” is not a policy disagreement. It is the language of the Great Replacement theory, repackaged for a Senate seat. It tells voters that a Muslim American cannot be a patriot, cannot be trusted, and cannot hold power, because his faith itself is treated as evidence of an intent to destroy the country he was born and raised in. That is not rhetoric. That is a smear built on hate, and it puts real people in real danger.
This is inciting further hatred against Muslims and Muslim politicians. This is sickening. And it should never be normalized as ordinary political speech from a sitting United States senator.
I condemn this attack in the strongest terms. I call on Senator Tuberville to retract it. And I call on every elected official who has stayed silent to say, clearly and by name, that this is unacceptable.
If you are outraged by Senator Tommy Tuberville’s Islamophobic attack on Abdul El Sayed, please call and email his office today. Tell him this rhetoric is bigotry, anti-Muslim hate and racism, and demand he retract it and condemn the fear and hate it stirs up against Muslim Americans. His Washington DC office number is 202-224-4124. His Mobile, Alabama office number is 251-308-7233. Senator Tuberville does not list a direct public email address; constituents can reach him through the official contact form at tuberville.senate.gov/contact. Your call and your voice matter. Please make them heard.

Talarico Explains Infamous ‘Powell Memo’ to Texas Voters, Making Right-Wing ‘Master Plan’ a Campaign Issue

 Such an excellent, illuminating, and 
deeply important article!
— Molly

“The top 1% put the American Dream behind a paywall,” said the Texas Democrat as he unveiled a framework for his economic vision.

By Julia Conley

Politicians from both sides of the aisle have come to realize in recent years that “affordability” and “cost of living” are key issues voters want to hear about on the campaign trail, with nearly all respondents to a Harris Poll last month reporting they believe the US is currently in an affordability crisis.

But on Wednesday, before 1,300 Texans in the city of Arlington, state Rep. James Talarico (D-50), the Democratic US Senate candidate, contextualized the crisis for voters.

Talarico provided a history lesson that explained how—while his opponent, Attorney General Ken Paxton, has blamed the Biden administration for rising costs and the struggles of working Texans—“this affordability crisis isn’t something that happened over the last five years. This affordability crisis has been 50 years in the making.”

While introducing his economic platform, “The New American Dream,” Talarico held the audience’s attention as he explained the Powell Memo—a document formally titled “Attack on American Free Enterprise System,” which Virginia-based corporate lawyer Lewis Powell wrote in 1971 for his client, the US Chamber of Commerce.

The memo, said Talarico, provided “a blueprint for how corporations could amass political power, reverse the gains of the Great Society and the New Deal, and rig the system for themselves.”

“The Powell memo outlined a strategy. Unite corporate special interests, privilege corporate perspectives in the media, appoint sympathetic judges to the court, and buy politicians in both political parties,” continued Talarico. “And it worked. Republicans and some Democrats sold the false gospel of trickle-down economics.”

In the memo, Powell—who was appointed to the US Supreme Court by President Richard Nixon just months after he delivered the blueprint to the powerful Chamber of Commerce—outlined how the interests of corporate America should be framed as “individual freedom” that the country must protect.

Private companies should use political influence “aggressively and with determination” to stop “the stampedes by politicians to support any legislation related to ‘consumerism’ or to the ‘environment,’” wrote Powell, and should show no “reluctance to penalize politically those who oppose” the corporate effort.

“Strength lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort, and in the political power available only through united action and national organizations,” the memo argued.

The result of that “long-range planning” and “consistency of action over an indefinite period of years,” said Talarico, is the current political system—in which corporate interests pour billions of dollars into elections to support favorable candidates, Congress passes massive tax breaks for billionaires, and working families are left struggling to afford healthcare, childcare, and other essentials.

“Trickle-down economics is not a theory, it is theft,” he said. “Since the late 1970s, megadonors and corporate special interests have been buying politicians in both political parties. And then those politicians turned around and rigged the economy to benefit their wealthy donors at our expense. We have an affordability crisis because we have a corruption crisis.”

He added that five decades after the Powell Memo, “the top 1% put the American Dream behind a paywall”—pointing to the extreme wealth of tech CEOs like Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, while “one in five Texas children live in poverty.”

David Sirota of The Lever, whose team produced the award-winning 2024 podcast “Master Plan,“ which details the history and influence of the Powell Memo, applauded Talarico for speaking directly to voters about the long history behind today’s ”affordability crisis.“

“Talarico is recounting—and promising to fight—the master plan that we exposed. And he’s making that promise in one of America’s most high-profile Senate races,” said Sirota.

Talarico’s event in Arlington marked the beginning of a monthlong tour across Texas in which he plans to roll out his plans to begin reversing the decades of damage done by the Powell Memo and politicians from both major parties who have prioritized corporate interests over working Americans.

The candidate’s agenda includes raising the minimum wage; closing billionaire tax loopholes and ending tax breaks for the top 1% of earners in President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act; passing universal childcare; permanently expanding the child tax credit; passing an anti-corruption package to ban super political action committees; and providing down payment assistance for first-time home buyers.

“People are working hard every day,” said Talarico. “They’re playing by the rules. But those rules of today weren’t written for us. They were written for billionaires.”

Please go here for the original article: https://www.commondreams.org/news/powell-memo-1971

PLEASE ALSO WATCH THIS
RELATED EXCELLENT DOCUMENTARY:


Smothered by Riches: A History of the
Powell Memo by Peter Coyote

OR

Read the book: 

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Lewis Goldstein: War in Iran

 An excellent piece by our friend Lewis.
— Molly

Marzia Rezaei reacts while standing near the grave of her son, Erfan, who was killed in strikes, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, at Behesht-e Zahra cemetery, in Tehran, Iran, March 16, 2026. Alaa Al-Marjani, REUTERS
The aftermath of an Israel strike on a school in Minab, Iran [Abbas Zakeri/Mehr News/WANA via Reuters]

Simple Solution



War

There is an easy and effective solution to Trump’s and the world’s problem as regards the war in Iran. Yet the solution is close to impossible for a narcissist to enact. What is required is the simple truth.

Trump has to say to the Iranians that he made a mistake. He started a war, together with Israel, that he never should have started. He can begin by being accountable for needlessly killing 165 or so little girls by bombing their school and offer reparations to their families and to the families of everyone he killed. Then he can sit down with the Iranian leaders and negotiate to return, as much as possible, to the accord reached by Obama and Kerry. Finally, he can dissociate himself and America from Israeli influence, suspending all financial support of Netanyahu’s genocide and killing.

But of course this requires accountability and humility, the ability and willingness to admit to wrongdoing and recognize the consequences of his behavior. So far, this has proven impossible for Trump and his sycophants. This type of strength is beyond his prideful comprehension. It is also historically incomprehensible to most men. Homer wrote of the violent, terrible pride of men in his ancient epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey. In these stories, Odysseus leaves home and his beloved wife out of loyalty to King Menelaus, who goes to war because his too-young and beautiful wife, Helen, runs off with the young and handsome Paris. He abandons home and the divine feminine to fight and kill for ten years and then spends ten years trying to get back home. A terrible, tragic, and suffering result of toxic male pride. He does make it back to the divine feminine but only after much murder and mayhem. What a waste of life and love...an exciting and stupid story. A story we have lived by for thousands of years. A story available to us on Netflix, Fox, Amazon… and on… and on and on.

Our cultural stories of war and manhood are old, useless, and taking us to final catastrophe.

Here’s another suggestion. Pete Hegseth, “fearless warrior” and believer in the war story, should take estrogen instead of testosterone, grow a pair of ovaries, and shrink his pathetic balls.

The world will be better for it and for some honest, accountable truth.

It’s way overdue for us to conceive and create a world without war, once and for all. It may not sell as well among men at the box office, but we’ll all live longer and safer.

Please go here for the original article: https://goldsteinl.substack.com/p/war-in-iran

Monday, July 27, 2026

Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer: The Holding

Photo by Molly

 The Holding

Alone, I am too small to meet 
the great weight of your pain.
Loving, I want to turn toward you. 
Aching, I want to turn away.
But yesterday I rested for a time 
on a wide gray rock in an alpine cirque.
In my stillness I felt how surely 
I was cradled by the world so much 
vaster than I. There, surrounded
by greatness, I invited your pain 
into my heart and held you there in me. 
I breathed in your ache, my ache,
and felt us both surrounded 
by vast fields of wildflowers, 
by the deep green shoulders 
of sheer gray cliffs. I envisioned 
I was breathing out love, but more truly, 
I was being breathed by the mountain, 
or perhaps  by life itself.
The weight of the pain was no less, 
but I knew it as a blessing, 
a gravitational force magnetizing you and me.
What a gift to hold the weight together,
to know in my whole being  
how miraculously we are held. 

Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer


Sunday, July 26, 2026

Denise Stewart: Wanton Ecological Destruction and the Madness of Greed


I don’t usually post about “the war,” but someone needs to say out loud that this is not only slaughter of people, destruction of a region.

It is wanton ecological destruction.
If I went out today and set a forest fire, I would be charged, condemned, and punished, vilified and rightly so.
We all and the law, understand that one reckless human being does not have the right to endanger the living world.
And yet very questionable men in offices, uniforms, and boardrooms can gamble with an entire sea, an entire coastline, an entire region, an entire civilization, an entire population, and call it strategy.
Call it commerce.
Call it geopolitics.
They Dress it up in serious language and act as though it is something other than vandalism on a planetary scale.
A tanker too heavy for the safer route.
Offload half the cargo and lose money.
Turn back into danger and risk catastrophe.
Blow up an oil refinery, make it rain oil.
And somehow this passes for rational decision-making.
This is the madness of greed: the cargo is precious, the insurance is precious, the profits are precious, but the sea is treated as if she is infinite, mute, and there to absorb the consequences of male ambition.
She is not.
The coral, the fish, the birds, the currents, the shorelines, the air , the land, the future, all of it is being forced to pay the price for decisions made by people who will never personally drink the poisoned water, wash oil from feathers, or kneel in the ruin of what they have destroyed.
Word on the curb is, they might build a golf course and a luxury hotel over top of some of the devastation.
And still ordinary people are lectured.
Use less. Buy less. Recycle more.
Sip through your soggy paper straw.
Do your part.
Meanwhile the powerful set the world alight and call it policy.
That is the obscenity of it.
The law understands perfectly well that the natural world must be protected from YOU.
It becomes strangely confused when the potential offender owns a tanker, an oil company, or an army.
If one person torching a forest is a crime, then knowingly risking the poisoning of a sea should be treated as a crime too.
Because this is not collateral damage.
It is not unfortunate fallout.
It is not the cost of doing business.
It is desecration.
And I am tired of watching the Mother be treated like an expendable backdrop for the endless tantrums of empire, greed, and war.
But yes, they got you sucking on your soggy paper straw.


Nathan Nicholson: The Same Old Playbook

 Excellent! And 100% spot on!
— Molly


At Some Point Being Deceived
Becomes Choosing the Lie

Trump supporters: “Trump will make America great again!”
Then what, exactly, is “great” about what he is actually doing to America?
Are Trump supporters simply being deceived? Or do they genuinely support policies that deepen poverty, drive up the cost of living, inflate gas prices, enable scamflation and crony capitalism, funnel public money and government power toward Trump and his allies, send Americans to die in pointless wars, and allow a president to abuse his office for personal profit and political protection on a scale without precedent in American history?
Do they support a president who is systematically attacking elections, the courts, Congress, the free press, independent law enforcement, political opposition, and every institution capable of restraining his power?
And when the movement demands loyalty even through the Epstein scandal, protects Trump from meaningful scrutiny, attacks anyone demanding disclosure, and treats questions involving the sexual exploitation of children as just another partisan inconvenience, how much uglier does this have to get before people stop pretending this is about “making America great”?
The evidence is no longer hidden. It is happening in public. Trump tells people what he intends to do, does it in front of them, and then relies on propaganda, grievance, conspiracy theories, and tribal loyalty to convince his followers that the reality they can see with their own eyes is somehow fake.
At some point, “they were deceived” stops being a complete explanation.
Trump supporters fell for protofascist politics. Period. They were sold a mythology of national decline, internal enemies, betrayal, humiliation, and national restoration through one supposedly indispensable strongman. That is one of the oldest political scams in the fascist playbook.
And now the movement has advanced beyond rhetoric. Trump is concentrating power, demanding personal loyalty from government institutions, attacking independent centers of authority, using the state against political enemies, attempting to control elections, threatening the press, defying legal restraints, rewarding loyalists, and treating the presidency as an instrument of personal wealth, revenge, and permanent political power.
Trump looks less like a normal American president with every passing day and more like the kind of leader Americans were once taught to recognize as a warning.
The Mussolini comparison is no longer rhetorical excess. The Stalin comparison speaks to something equally disturbing: Trump’s totalitarian instinct and his obsession with enemies, personal loyalty, historical revision, institutional submission, and the idea that the leader himself should stand above every independent source of truth, law, or authority.
Calling Trumpism merely “authoritarian” at this point is becoming intellectually empty. Authoritarianism describes some of the methods, but the ambition is totalitarian.
Trump loves screaming “communist” and “socialist” at his enemies, even though true communism has never actually happened anywhere on this planet, Stalinism was totalitarianism rather than communism, and Hitler was no socialist. Yet Trump behaves more like those totalitarian dictators than any of the people he accuses.
The ugliest question is no longer whether Trump supporters were fooled at the beginning. It is how much evidence they can see, how much corruption they can excuse, how much cruelty they can normalize, and how many democratic restraints they can watch him destroy before continued support becomes something more than mere deception.
The playbook is old, and although the scapegoats change, the lie stays the same: manufacture an internal enemy, convince people that only one strongman can save them, and then demand more power in the name of national survival.
At some point, being deceived becomes choosing the lie. And when people knowingly defend the scapegoating, excuse the corruption, surrender democratic restraints, and demand more power for the strongman anyway, history has a name for the politics they are participating in:
Fascism.