Thursday, July 23, 2026

EXCELLENT! — Mo Husseini: It Ain't About TikTok, Ya Fuckin' Spoons.

 Just absolutely spot on!! Deepest gratitude, 
as always, to Mo Husseini!
— Molly
Missing the forest for the trees, with today's Democratic Party establishment.

By Mo Husseini

Everybody in the chattering classes has some theory about why Mamdani ‘works’ and (if I can offer my own theory) I think most of them are poking at the wrong thing. Whether it’s the Rent Freeze talk, or the buses, or his age, or the TikTok fluency, or the socialism, or his smile, or how he looks, or the fact that he’s a Muslim who says Palestine without checking the room first. And all of them are good. But I think they all miss the point.

It’s how he talks to people.
I think it’s really as simple as that.
He talks to people like they are adults. Like they can handle the truth. Like they can parse nuance. Like they can hear him and hear that he hears them. And in a Democratic party that has spent the past forty years learning how to address its own voters the way you’d talk to a toddler or a cat you’re trying to coax out of a tree (speak softly, move slowly, be comforting), when a guy shows up and just speaks to us straight, without the bullshit nostrums and pabulum, it’s quite the fucking contrast. He speaks to his constituency like they’re his peers, not the ‘marks’ in a con.
The Netanyahu business this week, is a great example of what I mean. Cards on the table from my side, I don’t have a single scintilla of doubt that Netanyahu is a war criminal and I think he should be tried for it. But put aside (if you can) the content of Mamdani’s video, because it’s not (to my mind) the controlling factor here.
What matters is that Mamdani spoke repeatedly during the campaign about how he’d have the NYPD arrest Bibi if he attended the UNGA kickoffs in NYC. And now, in office, the lawyers sit him down with the actual law and say, “Yeah… no. You don’t get to do that.” And instead of disappearing the promise, instead of memory-holing it (the consultant-reflex: delete the tweet, pretend it never happened), or lying and trying to BS his way through by acting like a mayor can execute an ICC warrant against a foreign head of state (the demagogue/Trump-reflex), he does the rarest thing in American politics. He levels. “We do not have the independent legal authority to enforce this warrant. The federal government, however, does, and I call on them to join the ICC and execute this warrant.” And then, he follows it up with the coda, “Netanyahu is not welcome in New York City, nor is any other war criminal at large.”
That…. Right there is the whole fucking thing in miniature.
He tells you the precise edge of his own power (this is what a mayor can actually do, this is what he can’t) and he keeps the moral pressure ratcheted all the way up at the very same time.
He doesn’t spin up a fantasy. He doesn’t dress it up as prudence. He tells you what’s what, hands you the brief and trusts you to read it: Here’s what a mayor can do, what a mayor can’t… here’s who’s actually got a hand on the switch, now go and lean on them. That is a man who assumes that you are smart enough to sit through a civics lesson without needing a squeezable applesauce tube and a little nap in the story corner afterward. The Democratic Party’s assumption is basically the exact opposite, and my argument is that voters know exactly and precisely which assumptions are being made about them.
He made a similar move on the pay raise he was offered this past week, and that one is probably more telling, because the stakes are so tiny. A pay bump is dangled in front of him, something like forty-seven grand on top of the two-fifty-eight he already pulls, and instead of the usual focus-grouped aria of gratitude and humility, he gives the flattest, most obvious human sentence available. Nobody I met on the campaign trail told me the mayor’s salary was too low. And then, “that’s not my concern either.” That’s it. That’s the whole fucking answer delivered without a ‘woe is me’ speech or a violin section. Just a grown-ass man saying an obvious true thing out loud, which somehow, in the year 2026, is laudable, because we’ve all managed to forget it should be the base-level, bog-standard, expectation.
And before you jump in with your “Duh… this only works in ultra-liberal NYC” bullshit and try to file my argument under the idea that he’s a regional-only lefty-boy-wonder leveraging some kind of coastal-socialist-Blue-State-charisma, or whatever the fuck stupid ass reductive pundit shorthand happens to be today’s Plat du Jour, let me point at the exact same frequency in a completely different zip code, because I really do think it has fuck-all to do with ideology.
Look at James Talarico, in Texas. A former grade-school teacher who went to seminary and is now, in the year of our lord 2026, somehow the Democratic nominee for the United States Senate. And he does one thing, over and over, relentlessly. He talks to his constituency in the kinds of language and with the kinds of thinking that they think in. He talks about scripture. He quotes from the Bible and speaks from inside the house. He sounds like them and speaks in a way that honors them and who they are, and then, FROM INSIDE that language… he jiu-jitsus the whole thing and reframes the issue as top-versus-bottom instead of left-versus-right. He fisked a bill jamming the Ten Commandments into public school classrooms on the floor of the State house and he did it in a language and from a place that the audience understood and aligned with. He spoke as a believing Christian and that was precisely what gave his critique teeth. The guy argued with Joe Rogan over abortion and framed his position through an analysis of the Annunciation, “creation has to be done with consent, you cannot force someone to create,” Buy the theology or don’t, I genuinely don’t give a flying fuck. I’m not talking about what Talarico believes. I’m talking about how he communicates.
Or look a little further north, at Rob Sand in Iowa. The dude is the only Democrat elected to anything statewide in years, and he’s running for governor and is probably one of our best shots at prying a governor’s mansion loose. And his whole approach is a rebuke to the last twenty years of bullshit Democratic strategy. He visits all ninety-nine counties in the state as a matter of plain routine, political humility, and electoral hygiene. The kid is standing in VFW halls and county fairgrounds full of three-time-MAGA voters, and he neither engages them with contempt, nor slobbers all over them. He just calls it like it is, in language that is clear and resonant and points out exactly who’s picking their pockets, and he sidesteps every last fucking bit of the culture-war bullshit. The guy has decided that a farmer in a folding chair is worth his time and deserves a straight answer, and that, friends, is the exact thing the national party forgot right around the time it decided that the middle of the country was a thing you fly over on the way to a fundraiser in the Hamptons from a fundraiser in Marin County.
Trump detonated the whole Republican party’s establishment exactly by point-blank refusing to speak in that sanded-down, poll-tested, say-nothing dialect the professionals all swore was the only safe way to talk. And that instinct was (painful as it is to say) entirely correct. The difference between Trump and Sand or Talarico or Mamdani though, is that Trump doesn’t respect his constituency. He flatters and lies to them instead. He’ll tell them whatever sounds good… That Mexico is going to pay for the wall… That the tariffs will come out of some foreigner’s pocket… That they’ll never ever have to do anything hard because they’re the best people ever. With Trump, it’s straight talk as a con but in lots of ways, 2016 Trump was the right-wing’s Mamdani. Which, IMHO, is a big part of why the left hasn’t been able to fight him effectively. He built that base in 2016, and yeah, it’s bleeding out now, but it’s still alive and still remembers the flattery.
Talarico and Sand and Mamdani are the honest version of that very same instinct, the version that hands you something true even when the true thing is nowhere close to what you were hoping to hear. Same voice. Opposite intent.
They hand you something you might not actually want to hear (I can’t arrest the guy, the salary’s fine, the real fight is top-versus-bottom and not the culture war they sold you, your own governor’s donors are quietly robbing you blind) based on the CRAZY assumption that you are an adult who would rather have the truth than the flattery. Texas, Iowa, NYC. It doesn’t matter.
Now go and stand Schumer and Jeffries next to any one of them. The whole corporate-dick-sucking-donor-class-reacharound-consultancy-brained leadership class is fluent in one specific dialect of nothing (We hear you… We’re fighting for you… The stakes have never been higher… Please do chip in five dollars). It’s like reading AI stories or listening to muzak… it’s a particular brand of inoffensive bullshit engineered to sound like a position without ever actually being one. Quotable as hell, and impossible to pin down.
People feel that shit. Voters aren’t dumb. They may be uninterested in politics, but when they do hear these guys, they can smell the bullshit coming off the screen. Because every platitude is itself a condescension. And every day brings another small daily dose of it, and eventually everyone on the receiving end knows it in their gut and switches off. The con’s blown, dipshits. The voters see it. They can see it in how you engage with them. Instead of treating them like adults, you’re saying “Listen idiots, I understand the machinery at an altitude you will simply never reach, so hush now, let me chew the complexity up for you and vomit it into your mouth, and you’ll thank me for it.”
It’s contempt with a comms team.
Mainstream Dems have optimized themselves clean into irrelevance. Every sentence run through the panel until it can’t offend anyone because it no longer means anything, every position triangulated to the exact center of a room full of tired ideas that have nothing to do with the moment.
And the sad reality that it highlights is that you don’t put every word you’re about to say through thirty undecided voters in a strip-mall conference room unless, somewhere down in the lizard-brain part of your skull, you have already decided the public is a hazard to be managed and not an equal to be leveled with.
The base worked this out ages ago. Democratic leadership now polls about as well with its own voters as the Republican establishment did back in 2015, right before that same base got fed up and fed it to Trump. Schumer got told “you are out of touch” to his face after helping wave through weapons for the very government whose prime minister Mamdani wants in handcuffs.
The house is on fire and Schumer and Jeffries are workshopping strongly-worded letters.
It’s been quite funny watching the idiot-consultant-class learn all the wrong lessons from Mamdani. They’re looking at the view counts and panicking and deciding that the magic is in the production design. They’re hiring ‘youngsters’ with a Premiere license to start cranking out vertical videos with the warm film grain and the red-and-orange retro fonts and the candidate ambling through a bodega in artfully rolled shirtsleeves, gesturing gravely at the price of eggs, and underneath all that lovely seventies color grade it will be the exact same triangulated mush it always was. We hear you. We’re fighting for you. Chip in five dollars.
It’s a fucking consultant-led-cult building things that LOOK like other things… not things that WORK like other things.
You cannot TikTok and art-direct and cool-slang your way to authenticity. What matters is whether we, the voters who you need to vote for you, actually believe that you think we’re your equals and that we deserve honesty and respect. And I promise you that there is no Instagram filter that will make that happen if it isn’t true.
People are just starving to be talked to like they’re not stupid. Say true things that you actually believe and say them in your own real voice, especially when it costs you something, and trust the people who are listening to you. That’s the whole trick. It’s not even much of a trick. And Mamdani didn’t fucking invent it. He just arrived at a moment where the Democratic Party has forgotten how to do a thing they used to be able to do.
It’s about respect. Everything else is noise.

Please go here for the original article: https://substack.com/home/post/p-208126379

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Zorhan Mamdani: Benjamin Netanyahu Is a War Criminal and Architect of a Horrific Genocide Against the Palestinian People

Well said and 100% spot on! It is so clear to me that what Zohran Mamdani is illuminating here is the insanity of how what is so profoundly needed and just is deemed not necessary, not possible, not justified. After all, we’re just talking about an ongoing genocide. Right?! Allowing the psychopath war criminal Netanyahu to walk around free and be welcomed in our country is the equivalent to welcoming Hitler in the midst of the Holocaust. It’s just insane madness. Meanwhile I passionately support, applaud, appreciate, respect, and am inspired by Mayor Mamdani and all who fiercely seek justice in a brutal unjust world. May they inspire us all! — Molly

BREAKING: CHECKMATE! Mayor Zohran Mamdani releases a historic video calling Israeli PM Netanyahu a "war criminal" and DEMANDS that the federal government arrest him if he steps foot in the U.S.
This just put Trump in an impossible position...
"Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal, the architect of a horrific genocide against the Palestinian people. He is responsible for the killing of more than 73,000 people..." the mayor stated in an official video posted to X.
This kind of statement, a blunt admission of the truth, was unthinkable just a few short years ago. But now, after witnessing the wholesale slaughter in Gaza, much of the Democratic Party is embracing what the rest of the world has long been saying. Israel is conducting a genocide and Netanyahu is its mastermind.
"...for the maiming of tens of thousands of children, as those who survive undergo amputation without anesthesia," continued Mamdani. "For the targeting of neonatal hospitals and maternity care centers, denying newborns even the chance to live."
"For the countless people he starved as he blocked food and hundreds of aid workers and journalists. And just last month, the UN confirmed that Palestinian children continue to be deliberately targeted and killed by Israeli armed forces, more than eight months after the so-called ceasefire."
"The list goes on and on. All as we, as Americans, pay for the bombs that do the killing," said Mamdani. "There is a reason the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest."
"As human beings, we have spent generations building a shared understanding that there are crimes so grave they offend all of humanity," he continued. "Anyone, with their eyes, with their heart, with their conscience, should recognize the devastation he has wrought and understand that he belongs before a court of law. As I've said, I agree with the ICC that Benjamin Netanyahu should be arrested and tried for his crimes, as I do for anyone else charged by the ICC."
"My administration has reviewed every avenue available, under applicable law, to determine whether New York City could execute the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant if Benjamin Netanyahu came here," the mayor said. "It is clear that we do not have the independent legal authority to enforce this warrant. The federal government, however, does, and I call on them to join the ICC and execute this warrant."
This is a crucial point. In recent days, Mamdani's discussion of possibly arresting Netanyahu has engendered vitriolic rage from the radical pro-Zionist minority in this country. Trump himself rushed to Truth Social to insist it would not happen. It's not enough for these people that Israel be given the weapons to carry out their genocide and regional conquests, they also demand that the rest of us treat their political leaders like kings instead of the criminals they are.
If Mayor Mamdani had the authority to do so, it's clear that he would arrest Netanyahu. But this kind of high profile, international act can only be ordered by the White House. And unlike Trump, Mamdani respects the rule of law.
By demanding action from the federal government, the mayor is placing the onus squarely on Trump's shoulders. Of course, this President would never in a million years consider holding Netanyahu accountable for his actions. They're mass-murdering birds of a feather (to say nothing of the possibility that Mossad has blackmail on Trump from his time with Epstein).
What this call to action from Mamdani really does is tie Trump inexorably to the Netanyahu regime. When he inevitably refuses to arrest this man, he'll be sending a full-throated message to the American people that he totally supports the deeply unpopular government in Tel Aviv. Israel First is the slogan of this administration. With the midterms right around the corner, that's a recipe for electoral disaster for MAGA.
"And I want to be equally clear, Benjamin Netanyahu is not welcome in New York City, nor is any other war criminal at large," Mamdani added. "While we cannot end the genocide on our own, we can decide whether our silence will become another weapon, and we can examine every tool we have to defend the humanity and dignity of all people. That is my commitment to you."
Please like and share if you stand with Zohran and New York City!

Copied from Occupy Democrats

CHILLING — Marco Rubio Illuminates How He Is the Joseph McCarthy of Our Times

Absolutely chilling. The McCarthy era is now dangerously emerging in full force and this is an escalation. It is so obvious that those like Zohran Mamdani and Amy Goodman must be demonized by the current fascist administration because they represent such a huge threat to the growing grip of neoliberal fascism on our country. We must be aware of what is happening and join together in solidarity to defend justice, truth, equality, democracy, dignity, human rights, and the highest good for us all. — Molly

Prominent leftwing politicians, influencers and groups have been named in a US department of state report into Cuba’s “sustained campaign of subversion” against the US.
New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani, streamer Hasan Piker, Democracy Now host Amy Goodman and Ben and Jerry’s founder Ben Cohen, are among those named in the 100 page report entitled “Cuba: The Capital of 21st Century Communism” which was released on Monday.
The report, described by journalist Ken Klippenstein as a “blacklist”, also lists the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), a major grassroots group that canvasses for and endorses leftwing politicians.
Presenting little if any evidence for its claims, the report says Cuba has conducted “a campaign that has infiltrated the highest reaches of the US government, recruited and cultivated generations of American activists, backed an unprecedented wave of leftwing terrorism on American soil, and carried out one of the most durable and damaging foreign intelligence penetrations in American history.”
Promoting the report on X, secretary of state Marco Rubio wrote: “For more than six decades, the Cuban regime has been the leading sponsor of radical leftism and Third Worldism in the United States.”
Last week Rubio convened a conference of 66 countries to discuss supposed leftwing terrorism, with Rubio calling leftists “an encroaching darkness” and “the enemies of civilisation”.
The report openly mentions “blacklists, McCarthy-era investigations and prosecutions, and a slate of anti-communist laws” in the 1950s which caused the Communist Party USA membership to collapse.
Over three pages are dedicated to the DSA, which counts representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib, and New York mayor Zohran Mamdani among its members.
The report says the group “serves as a particularly potent illustration of the
ideological victory of Cuba’s effort to position itself as the spiritual capital of Third Worldist radicalism”.

Copied from Novara Media



Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Chris Hedges: Becoming the Stranger

This is such an excellent piece, as always, by Chris Hedges. And it is painful, chilling, and beyond heartbreaking. But true. Thank you, Chris. Thank you Ece Temelkuran.

The thing that following Chris Hedges for the past 20 years has done for me, along with others as courageous and committed to truth as he, is that my stamina has grown for witnessing, absorbing, integrating, sharing, and acting upon the hard realities we truly must face. My connection with the fierce love and wisdom of my heart has, in part, grown stronger and stronger because of the inspiration, integrity, courage, truth, and profound caring for all of life that Chris Hedges embodies. 

Gratefully, he is not alone. There are countless others who I am also drawn to who relentlessly, fearlessly, courageously do the deep dive into the injustices and tragedies and traumas of our times, times past, and the times to come. And I find myself also repeatedly returning to this quote from James Baldwin: "Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced." 

This is what I believe we all need to know, absorb, and integrate that there has long been this great urgency for us, individually and collectively, to seek and follow the threads of truth no matter where they lead and face hard, hard realities again and again and again. This "profound commitment to truth" is something that I first heard Chris speak to many years ago on one of the many occasions that he came to Portland to speak. Life changing experiences for me and countless others. And I am so grateful.

All this said, it is also of the deepest importance that, in the midst of it all, we take good care of ourselves and each other and that we not lose sight of the beauty, courage, generosity, wisdom, and love that connects us all with the wholeness of our deepest Selves. There is an abundance of what is Sacred it is found in all of life.

It is never too late to do the right thing and expand our capacity to act out of wisdom, generosity, compassion, and love. May we do our part, whatever that is, to stand in protection of what is precious and Sacred in our beloved, beautiful, hurting world.🙏🙏 Molly

Becoming the Stranger - by Mr. Fish
The road to fascism, as Ece Temelkuran writes in “Nation of Strangers,” was constructed over the last six decades of neoliberal assault. We have arrived at the terminus.

By Chris Hedges

We are becoming strangers. Strangers in our own countries. Strangers in the world. The values we cherish, the liberties we once took for granted, and the possibility of a democratic future are vanishing. The communities where we found meaning and purpose are being demolished. The iron grip of fascism is being consolidated. The decades long assault on democratic institutions in the name of neoliberalism, better understood by its less sanitized name, cutthroat capitalism, is reaping its grim harvest.

Ece Temelkuran in “Nation of Strangers: Rebuilding Home in the 21st Century” draws on her exile from Turkey, as she did in her previous book, “How to Lose a Country: The 7 Steps from Democracy to Dictatorship,” to prepare us for a future we do not want but will be forced to endure.

“Nation of Strangers” is written as a series of forty letters beginning in June 2022 and ending in April 2025. Each letter is addressed “Dear Stranger,” which slowly drives home the point that we will soon become, like her, a stranger. First in our own land, then, for some of us, in exile.

She scoffs at our mania for hope, the naïve belief that our hollowed out and corrupted institutions can roll back the fascist tide.

“I don’t believe in hope,” she writes, “but in determination, having faith and doing what you can to survive when there is no hope.”

Temelkuran was a prominent Turkish novelist essayist, and journalist. She wrote a widely read column and had a show on national television. She was also the bête noire of the government of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, especially after the publication of her 2016 book “Turkey: The Insane and the Melancholy.”

She left Turkey after being relentlessly smeared and attacked by government-run media, her colleagues started to be imprisoned, the death threats became “too regular to ignore,” and she lost her job.

Temelkuran called her mother on November 6, 2016, from Zagreb, Croatia: “Mom, I am not coming back home.”

“It was a one-minute phone call,” she explains. “Half of it was silence. But that’s all it took for me, in the autumn of 2016, to become homeless.”

She was 43.

You can see my interview with Temelkuran here.

“The neoliberal system’s reality — extreme inequality — cancels out the fundamental promise of democracy — equality — and that is why the idea of protecting democracy means less and less to people,” she writes.

We are rendered homeless not only because of those who hold power, whether it be Vladimir Putin, Narendra Modi, Benjamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, or Erdoğan, but because of a bankrupt liberalism, a faux opposition enslaved to the same corporate and oligarchic masters.

“Since our political outrage is considered irrelevant by the conventional homes of realpolitik, the old political parties, we find ourselves politically homeless, too,” Temelkuran notes. “We no longer know through which political medium we can unite our voices to be heard by the rulers. Like refugees, we stay in temporary places: protest tents, makeshift occupy-movement tents or strike marquees. In the cold or under the sun, we imagine and reimagine a new political home — like an exile who knows that the old home is impossible to return to but still misses a home.”

Fascism’s lifeblood is the demonization of the other, of the stranger.

By 2050, over 1 billion people will find themselves “at threat of being displaced” due to “environmental change, conflict and civil unrest.” By 2070, between 1 and 3 billion people may find themselves “left outside the climate conditions that have served humanity well over the past 6,000 [years].”

She warns that the genocide in Gaza is a template for what will come, an exercise by the global ruling class to see how much carnage it can inflict with impunity.

Temelkuran describes Gaza as “a long bleeding, thick scar on the world map,” that is “widening to become a fatal gangrene, swallowing up the entire body of humanity.” She cautions that the “new standards of brutality will be set,” that “too many will become homeless by the end of this story, and it will not only be those whose houses are bombed. And it will all begin with the loss of one word.”

“There will be no explicit agreement needed,” she goes on, “but gradually, people will avoid that one word that is deemed ‘problematic’. It is the word genocide in Germany today; in other countries, it will be other words.”

The void left by the lost word “will soon be filled with harmless words kindly suggested by the power-approved words, such as war, even though the other side is primarily civilians. ‘Let’s not call it a genocide but ‘atrocities.’ Eventually, it will become impossible to join the public conversation without uttering only those approved words. They will operate as signal flares to show that you are not using the criminalized word. This is how fascism works. It not only silences people but also forces them to speak in a certain way.”

Temelkuran chronicles the indignities of surmounting bureaucratic obstacles to apply for residency and visa permits in “soul-sucking waiting rooms.” She wonders, along with the other strangers, if, when the permit expires, it will be renewed or if she will be forced to find another refuge. She is hardened by exile. Humor is dark. She watches as refugees from the war in Ukraine arrive in Germany, clueless about what awaits them.

“The Ukrainians do not know this yet,” Temelkuran contends. “They don’t doubt that the promise made to them by the Western world will be kept. They still believe that they’ll be welcomed in a civilized manner and taken in gracefully, dignity intact. A very dark, very broken place in me wants to laugh that repugnant laugh. You wish, baby! They never take you in without crushing you first. You will despise yourself, hate everything, give up, turn numb, and only then will everything start happening. You will be welcomed only when you surrender.”

Her experience as an exile mocks the West’s conception of itself.

“Westerners still like to think of Europe as the safe haven for the oppressed intellectuals of the Global South, but that is giving too much credit to Europa when thousands are pushed back into the sea to die,” she insists. “Putting the spotlight on ‘the exile’ to divert from ‘the refugee’ operates as a crisis management tool, if not a branding strategy for Europe’s self-image.”

The persecution by the regime that drives the stranger into exile is not, ironically, the most difficult to digest.

“What the Westerners haven’t realized yet is that many of us do not leave our homes for fear of a dictator,” she writes. “They still make the distinction in their heads between the ‘goodies’ and the ‘baddies.’ But what truly severs your ties to a country is to see so many people, ordinary people, supporting the regime even after witnessing its evil — to see so many choosing to be evil. That is when your faith in humanity shakes. That is what ostracizes us and makes us homeless even when we are at home — the sense of being under siege from inhumanity, madness and brutality.”

The final blow, Temelkuran says, the one that “actually breaks you,” does not come from “the other side.” Rather, it “comes from those whom you think of as your people, your side. When the sense of defeat takes over the side you belong to, the anger or self-disgust of being on the losing side turns to self-hatred. The hatred turns people against each other, and then — as I did once before, permanently leaving the country — you find yourself under attack, more viciously than the other side can manage. They say you are not enough. No cut is deeper than that. That is the precise moment when you become a total stranger in your home, when not the dictator but your fellow people sever your ties to your country.”

Home for “the abyss of the unhomed self” is no longer a place. It is not “a thing of the past or a destination to be arrived at in the future.” It is found in “these moments of being fully in myself, an intermittent sense of wholeness, a rare but precious feeling of normal people, and it will only be in the here and now.”

While the home we leave behind may be gone, there are “new homes in the making that yield moments of peace when you least expect them.”

That, perhaps, is a kind of hope, but one accompanied by eternal mourning and estrangement.

Please go here for the original article: https://chrishedges.substack.com/p/becoming-the-stranger

Please go here for more from the Chris Hedges Report: https://chrishedges.substack.com/