Wednesday, March 7, 2018

YOUTH CLIMATE CASE CONTINUES!

Finally, more good news to share! These youth join millions of others in our nation and worldwide who know that the American government has known about the catastrophic impact of burning fossil fuels on climate change. Bless these children and youth who are standing up to such enormous greed and ignorance. May we all stand with them! — Molly

Ninth Circuit denies Trump's mandamus petition in Juliana v. US

By CAMILLA MORTENSEN


A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled  that the climate case, Juliana v. United States,  can proceed toward trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon.
The Trump administration had made the extraordinary move of filing for a writ of mandamus that could have ended the landmark case brought by 21 youth plaintiffs before it went to trial. The case is supported by locally based nonprofit Our Children’s Trust.
In a March 7 press release on the ruling, Sahara Valentine, a 13-year-old plaintiff from Eugene, said, “To our supporters: be ready for the new trial date and plan on being with us at the court house here, in Eugene, where our voices will be heard.”
The decision was entered without prejudice, meaning the Trump administration can file for mandamus relief in the future.
The full press release with a link to the ruling is below.
Ninth Circuit Rules in Favor of Youth Plaintiffs, Rejects Trump’s Attempt to Evade Constitutional Climate Trial
San Francisco – Today, Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas, writing for a unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration’s “drastic and extraordinary” petition for writ of mandamus in the landmark climate lawsuit, Juliana v. United States, brought by 21 youth supported by Our Children’s Trust. The Court ruled that the Juliana case can proceed toward trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon and that the Trump administration had not satisfied the factors necessary for an extraordinary writ of mandamus. The three-judge panel consisted of Chief Judge Sidney Thomas, and Circuit Judges Marsha Berzon and Michelle Friedland. Judge Friedland replaced Alex Kozinski on the panel after he resigned on December 18, 2017, one week after oral argument was held on the petition.
Julia Olson, executive director and chief legal counsel of Our Children’s Trust and co-counsel for youth plaintiffs said:
“The Ninth Circuit just gave us the green light for trial. We will ask the District Court for a trial date in 2018 where we will put the federal government’s dangerous energy system and climate policies on trial for infringing the constitutional rights of young people.”
The Trump administration’s mandamus petition sought early review of U.S. District Court Judge Ann Aiken’s 2016 denial of motions to dismiss the youth’s lawsuit, which seeks a constitutionally compliant national energy system and science-based climate recovery action by the federal government. Rejecting the government’s position in their petition, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the federal government had not established that it was harmed by any discovery order and had not met the factors for issuing an extraordinary writ. The Court concluded:
“There is enduring value in the orderly administration of litigation by the trial courts, free of needless appellate interference. In turn, appellate review is aided by a developed record and full consideration of issues by the trial courts. If appellate review could be invoked whenever a district court denied a motion to dismiss, we would be quickly overwhelmed with such requests, and the resolution of cases would be unnecessarily delayed.”
Like any other defendant who loses their motion to dismiss, the U.S. defendants must participate in discovery and defend themselves at trial, even though it will take time and resources to do so. That is the structure of our legal system.
Victoria Barrett, 18-year-old plaintiff from White Plains, New York, said:
“Today, the Ninth Circuit sided with progress. I’m grateful that my fellow plaintiffs and I can have our voices heard, and that climate science can have its day in court. The Trump administration tried to avoid trial, but they can’t ignore us. Our future is our choice and I believe the courts will stand with our constitutional rights.”

No comments: