All of that began to shift for me as I continued on my journey of gradual awakening. While I do not disrespect those who continue to endorse Eckhart Tolle as a wise spiritual teacher, for quite some time now I have no longer been able to do so myself. What I've been discovering, and personally recognizing as potentially harmful and limiting, is when spiritual truths are mixed in with what I have come to experience as teachings which actually inhibit our capacity to feel and learn from the depths of what we carry in our hearts. And to the degree that we are cut off from the heart within our own physical bodies is the degree that we will also likely be cut off from the hearts of others. This disconnect feeds our sense of separation, and this can occur even while we may be seeking to grow and evolve spiritually. This certainly happened for me.
The problem, among many, about a strong focus on my own personal "enlightenment" is that I continued to be unknowingly rejecting and estranged from parts of myself. I remained fragmented, stuck in shame and abandoned grief I did not know I had, and, on a deep level, not open to the vulnerability, trust, and conscious awareness that is essential to evolving into greater wholeness. The belief systems that I sought and tried to use to heal and awaken — including those of Eckhart Tolle — actually ended up contributing to the places where I'd been stuck for a very long time. And these blind spots inhibited not only my own personal growth, but also recognizing and embracing what my sacred role is in addressing the suffering in our world. As long as I neglected and denied places of pain within myself, I remained impaired in my capacity to empathize more deeply with others and to be of service in our world.
For many years now I have been moving away from beliefs, attachments, and resonance I once held with much of what the New Age movement adheres to, but which I ultimately found misleading and unhelpful. Over the many years of my awakening I have been blessed with many hard lessons from some well renown spiritual teachers and healers who in reality contributed to my stuck places and enabled me to keep some of the walls I'd built around my heart intact. I eventually came to recognize that I cannot catapolt into enlightenment and that this was never a wise goal to begin with. Instead I have learned that there is a necessity to go through the messy middle and feel what I feel, see what I see, need what I need, and risk to open to life's deepest lessons. This is the path which has been teaching me how to nourish, deepen, and expand my capacity for love, compassion, courage, humility, kindness, and wisdom. This is the journey of opening to the gift of how to embrace my divinity while also being a fully embodied human being.
* * * * *
This essay that I'm sharing from several years back is something I very much resonate with today. The essence here, for me, illuminates the shadow side of the teachings of Eckhart Tolle — and I would add for many other "New Age" teachers who seek to teach people how to bypass the deeper experiences, truths, and wisdom of our hearts. This journey from our heads to our hearts is what I have learned is an essential part of learning how to embody the gifts of the alchemist — embracing life's most difficult, painful, and challenging experiences as catalysts for both our personal growth and for claiming clarity as to what our role is in alleviating the suffering of humans, other beings, and the Earth.
It is my experience that we cheat ourselves if we are seeking enlightenment at the expense of an intimate relationship with ourselves and others. Yes, we are sacred souls having human experiences. And to claim the gifts of who we are as human beings means learning how to embrace the fullness of our humanity. And, for me, this means moving towards all of life, all that we feel in our hearts, all that connects us with other humans and other beings. I have learned that if we try to go around or under, rather than through, our hearts that we cut ourselves off from our wholeness. And once cut off from our wholeness we are inclined to be cut off from other humans and all the vulnerability, trust, humility, compassion, and love that comes with true intimacy. That authentic intimacy arises out of acceptance, not rejection, of ourselves in all of our fullness. I believe that embracing this wholeness is a lifelong journey for most of us, if we are so blessed.
And out of being fully embodied human beings, we are able to more fully experience our sacred interrelationship with all of life and contribute to the healing and awakening within our families and friendships, our communities and nations, and beyond. Moving beyond our own individual needs into the embrace and conscious awareness of our fellow planetary sisters and brothers is essential if we are to evolve as a species and transform our world. This is messy, courageous, hard, and beautiful work that is not meant to simply do alone or keep to ourselves. We all have gifts. We are all needed, all related, all family. We are truly all in this together. — Molly
Written
by Nathan
G. Thompson
Fellow 21st Century Yoga contributer Be Scofield has a provocative, new essay out on the limitations of Eckhart Tolle’s spiritual writings, particularly when it comes to addressing systemic social issues. Some folks just roll their eyes when they see the name Tolle, but I think if you want to understand the modern, American spiritual landscape, you gotta pay a bit of attention to his work. Before we go on to look at a few points in Be’s essay, I want to state where I stand on Tolle.
First
off, I don’t think he’s a charlatan. The guy seems to me to have
some clear insight into how our minds work, and the ways in which
humans get trapped by their thinking and habit patterns. In addition,
he has figured out how to bring together elements of different
religious traditions in a way that speaks across them and beyond
them. I’d say this is a positive, especially in terms of spreading
insights to the masses. I also like the guy’s general optimism
about humanity’s potential, and that he sees practices like
meditation as being a means towards awakening on a larger, collective
scale.
On
the flip side, like Be, I disagree with Tolle’s sense that “inner
work” alone will somehow solve the systemic misery that plagues so
many in this world. Having read a fair amount of his writing, and
listened to some of his talks, I find his general approach to be far
too individualistic in focus for my taste. Not only is social and
political action downplayed or dismissed outright, but you rarely
hear talk about communities, serving others, or anything else
associated with being together in groups. Just as is true of a lot of
American convert Buddhism,in Tolle’s writing you can’t help but
notice how heavily individual psychology and psychological theories
color what’s being said.
Beyond
all that, there’s the fierce, capitalist machine behind Tolle’s
work to contend with. Nearly everything this guy touches these days
is being turned into a product intended for “your awakening,” and
I don’t get the sense that he has any problem with that. In fact, I
think the packaging of Tolle as a non-threatening spiritual guru has
not only lead to wildly higher sales and spreading of his message,
but also wholesale rejection of his work by those like myself
actively resisting capitalism, colonialism, and the commodification
of spiritual practice.
Along
those lines, let’s take a look at a few paragraphs from Be’s
essay:
In
A New Earth Tolle goes so far as to claim all of the atrocities
associated with Communism could have been avoided had their been a
shift in their “inner reality, their state of consciousness.”
Again, his absolutism in regards to the power of internal
transformation is quite extreme. If communists would have only
stilled their minds, connected to their bodies and dis-identified
with their false egoic self he believes countless lives would have
been saved. It’s important to understand that when Tolle is
referring to shifting inner consciousness, he is specifically talking
about stilling the mind, not shifting inner social or political
consciousness. Of course the issues are far more complex than Tolle
presents. No simple solution like cultivating presence, stillness or
embodiment would have changed a profoundly complicated
socio-political experience that spanned vast territory and numerous
decades. Furthermore, he falsely believes that spiritual awakening
supports his social and political positions.
Tolle
is suggesting that what communists needed and what environmental
polluters need is internal spiritual transformation – not
education, training, relationship building, diversity training,
political understanding, environmental awareness or anything else.
Why? Because Tolle believes in an all-knowing divine power that once
channeled knows exactly what to do. This universal intelligence is
unfolding and working through humans. If only environmental polluters
and communists were to connect with God the world would be a much
better place. For those who successfully do, they are contributing to
more joy, peace, creativity and happiness on the planet. Spirit is
unfolding in a direction and it supports Tolle’s social and
political agenda and reflects his social location as a wealthy,
heterosexual, white male with $4 million in the bank and a Jaguar in
his driveway.
Social
positioning, and specifically a lack of critical consciousness around
his position in society, are major players in Tolle’s philosophy.
It’s so much easier for folks from privileged backgrounds to focus
on “inner” transformation, and to dismiss addressing systemic
social issues. Not only do they benefit from the status quo, but
they’re are less likely to see how the status quo creates suffering
in their own lives, let alone anyone else’s. Be’s absolutely
right to point out this failure in Tolle’s work to critically
examine social positions, and how they’re plugged into systems
built on patterns of injustice and deliberate oppression.
Please continue this essay here: http://www.buddhistpeacefellowship.org/the-failure-of-now-how-eckhart-tolle-coddles-the-status-quo-and-why-it-matters/
1 comment:
Right on. I have been feeling this for a long time. I think tis was beautifully and eloquently stated. The "fierce capitalism" is so true. He sits on an $80 million fortune, his marketing is aggressive, and retreats seem geared for the well of in expensive places. His POV has value but has limitations.
Post a Comment