This is a truly important, well articulated, and illuminating article from 2019 that remains deeply important.
It has also been a while since I last posted about neoliberalism. Today I am remembering how important it is to spread the truth in an ongoing way about neoliberalism and its devastating impacts on our country, other nations, and the planet.
To truly understand the waters in which we swim, I believe that it is vital to recognize, understand, heal, and transform the individual and collective trauma that impacts us all. Woven through the heartbreaks and horrors of our times, and especially over the last 40 years, neoliberalism has played a critical role in the countless faces of suffering and harm ― the vast redistribution of wealth upwards amidst ever growing and crushing poverty, the shipping of jobs overseas and crushing of smaller mom and pop shops nationwide by empires like Walmart, epidemics of violence and addiction and depression, the corporate takeover of our political and mainstream media systems, the plundering and devastation of the Earth, the heartless and cruel healthcare and immigration policies and shrinking of the social safety net, the polarizing propaganda which drives us into "othering" and projecting blame and shame and violence upon those who are also suffering, the feeding of the war machine and Wall Street and the fossil fuel and prison industries, the rise of fascism and white supremacy and Christian nationalism, and the ever growing and catastrophic heatwaves and winter storms, wildfires and droughts, hurricanes and tornadoes and typoons, rising seas and species extinctions and climate migrations. And on and on.
The ideology of neoliberalism is woven through our culture and infests our world. And yet so many, like myself until recent years, haven't heart of neoliberalism and do not understand what it is. This is the equivalent to living in Russia and not knowing what communism is. Neoliberalism is indeed the invisible ideology that we must understand, recognize, and work individually and together to extricate ourselves from and dismantle. Otherwise, the ideologies of rugged individualism, of I over We, and of unfettered sociopathic greed will continue to dominate, taking us all down. We must work together to radically shift our values and actions to ones which value life rather than destroy it.
There is another way. But first we must understand the problem before we can envision a world beyond late stage neoliberal predatory capitalist patriarchy. We can see the truth of what is, we can take deeper and deeper steps of extricating ourselves from systems of harm, and we can heal the toxicities which plague our culture and transform ourselves into human beings, communities, nations, and the world which consciously acts on behalf of a higher good for us all.
We are all connected, all related, all family. Our separateness is but an illusion. Another world is indeed possible. And it is up to us. May we recognize that the stakes are high, that over a million species including our own are at risk of extinction. May this awareness inspire us. We are all needed. We are all needed to do our part in the universal struggle to create a just, sustainable, caring, and peaceful world. ― Molly
Protesters attend a demonstration for climate protection in Dortmund, Germany, on August 2, 2019.INA FASSBENDER / AFP / GETTY IMAGES |
In his seminal political essay, “ ,” the dissident playwright and philosopher argued that becoming empowered requires us to “live in truth,” which means facing up to the uncomfortable reality that we are not solely victims of the political and economic order we live under, but sometimes also enablers who play into its myths and cover up its lies. We turn the lies into truth and come to believe it is the only way to get through, the only way to survive in what we are told again and again is a “dog-eat-dog” world.
It is this uncomfortable truth that inevitably raises the question: Why has neoliberalism succeeded so well? The answer is unsettling precisely because it implicates all of us — at least all of us who live in industrial capitalist countries. Even if we are not equally blameworthy in creating such a monstrous ideology, we have all, in some measure, been co-opted into accepting neoliberal capitalism’s false premises and promises.
It is quite true that domestic and international economic and political structures that legitimize neoliberal capitalism are oriented by, and in the interest of, an elite corporate class. Yet in the wake of the — the worst economic crash since 1929 — there has been no massive global uprising or any sustained call for radical institutional reform (with the exception of the short-lived grassroots movement, and to some extent, France’s movement).
Continuous rebellion and dissent leading to revolution has not happened because we appear to have tacitly bought into an ideology that ensures our own powerlessness to transform ourselves or our societies. The good news is that this is changing. In the last few years, many have become conscious of the fact that civilizational collapse as a consequence of human-caused climate disruption is directly attributable to an economic and political system that views the Earth and everything that lives on it as an inexhaustible means for individual and corporate profit.
For the first time in human history, we are confronted by the near certainty of global ecological catastrophe and its resulting political and economic breakdown — not as a consequence of natural causes, nor the vengeful act of a deity, but as a result of deliberate human choice. The brutal reality is that the present world of neoliberal economics and politics simply could not have survived had we not gradually acquiesced to it. So how did this happen?
The Beginnings of Neoliberal Thought
Let’s begin with the following truism: When compared to more brutalizing regimes of dominance and militaristic authoritarianism throughout history, we do have a greater measure of freedom today. With the emergence of liberal social rights and the United Nations recognition and validation of international human rights after the horrors of two world wars, the corporate and the governments that do their bidding implicitly understood that there would no longer be any toleration for political ideologies whose goal was to brutally repress human beings. So, the question for the latter was always how to ensure that the right class continued to be in a position of control and dominance, while at least providing the appearance of freedom and democracy for everyone else.
First, what is required is the semblance of choice and economic power — an ersatz form of freedom realized through the “self-organizing” and “self-correcting” “.” Free-market is expressly designed to counter any attempts by government to impose regulations on behalf of the public good that might impede profit, and to redefine citizens wholly as consumers. Human well-being is thereby reduced to a purely economic index.
Secondly, what is required is the semblance of democracy by way of electoral representative politics organized and paid for by moneyed interests. Lastly, what is required is the semblance of liberal institutional arrangements (education, social security, health care, policing, environmental and labor regulatory bodies) that increasingly do not serve public interest, but protect and serve private profit and business interests.
In conjunction with ersatz freedom of choice, democracy and the semblance of public institutions which appear to further or protect the public good, there is also what Havel might have called the — those persons, regulatory bodies and political parties who make a pretense of fighting on behalf of the public good and in favor of health, labor and environmental rights, while continuing to forward a corporate rights agenda behind the backs of citizens.
In the contemporary world, the corporate capitalist class and the neoliberal governments that do their bidding have been able to maintain the upper hand not through sheer force or brutality, but because they have gradually been allowed to corrode democratic institutions and eviscerate the and, therefore, any sense of mutual obligation and responsibility humans have toward each other.
Neoliberalism and Instrumental Reasoning
It is crucial to recognize here that modern capitalism from the 19th century emerged in tandem with a particular sort of — the sort of use-oriented reasoning that seems innocuous and practical because it enables us to “get things done.”
When we want to realize a particular end — say, build a house or mend a fence, we reason in an instrumental fashion — that is, we calculate what we need to do in order to successfully realize an end or achieve a goal. Instrumental reasoning does not tell us why we value ideas such as justice, love, courage, or why we care about other human beings, other animals or the planet. It is not about understanding or valuing the world, but always about how to succeed at realizing a goal in the most orderly and efficient way.
Modern bureaucracies and the administrative state are founded on instrumental rationality. However, when divorced from deeper human concerns about social and environmental justice, instrumental reasoning can become dehumanizing, hegemonic and, indeed, life-annihilating.
Imperialist bureaucracies and Nazi death camps were grounded in a form of instrumental reasoning detached from any sort of deeper value-oriented rationality that might speak to notions of human rights or dignity. The goal of genocide was enacted through Nazi bureaucracy and enabled by instrumental reasoning that was orderly, precise, lawful and lethal.
In the context of contemporary neoliberal capitalism, instrumental reasoning plays a pivotal enabling and legitimating role. If my end or goal is wealth or profit, then any means that will help me efficiently achieve this end is “rationally” acceptable, and even laudable.
When this sort of instrumental reasoning is married to a capitalist theory of human nature that views human beings as egotistic, competitive self-maximizers, and a neoliberal theory of economics and politics based on imperialism, technical control and domination of the planet, it must inevitably displace any sort of deeper value questions about the quality of life, the well-being of human communities and health of the biosphere.
From an instrumental reasoning perspective, we as a society have bought into the seductive discourses and practices of neoliberal capitalism by embracing the myths of individual consumer freedom and self-empowering entrepreneurship. The exercise of virtues that enable us to flourish as communities and nations are all jettisoned when instrumental reasoning and neoliberal capitalism become hegemonic.
Even when we appear at times to resist the logic of unjust outcomes that goes with neoliberalism, or question its theoretical or moral legitimacy, the fact remains that our politics, mainstream newspapers and electronic media, schools of economics and institutional arrangements, have been infiltrated, disciplined and systemically reframed by neoliberal doctrine, and legitimated through utilitarian calculation and instrumental reasoning.
Indeed, even the false mantra that “there is no viable alternative to capitalism” pervades modern thinking to such a degree that a wholly different kind of economics and politics has often seemed unthinkable to many. There is no need for brute force nor even overt forms of propaganda in such a world because the central presuppositions of neoliberalism have been normalized and mainstreamed in everyday society.
Moreover, interests are protected by private security and public police forces; they are fortified and universalized by international bodies, such as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, corporate lobby groups, Chambers of Commerce, Business Councils and roundtables, , and nonprofit corporate front groups such as the that draft legislation in the interests of corporations, and against environmental regulations, corporate taxation and labor rights.
Given all of the above, any talk of revolution or even the notion of mass citizen uprising resistance or rebellion might seem to be nothing less than delusional.
That is, until now.
Neoliberalism Versus the Climate
If there is one thing that history has made clear to us again and again, it is that no human construction is eternal, all-pervasive or invulnerable to change. Reality has a way of disrupting the status quo, messing up well-laid plans and invalidating conventional pieties.
In the last 20 years, reality has asserted itself in a way unprecedented in human history. For the first time, we are imminently threatened as a species because we have chosen an economic and political system that treats the planet as if it were no more than a means for infinite exploitation and individual wealth, rather than a limited Earth that only conditionally provides the possibility for all forms of life.
In an unprecedented way, what has come into focus today is both the limiting nature of instrumental reasoning and the life-destroying impact of neoliberal capitalism to which it is wedded. Climate disruption as a consequence of human-caused planetary warming has brought into sharp focus two stark and undeniable truths
- For the first time in human history, we have put including .
- The economic system of capitalism and its most recent neoliberal configuration is the cause of the present climate crisis that threatens human and other species’ survival.
The growing recognition of the above truths has pressed us to finally ask deeper questions about what we really value: the quality of life, the well-being of human and other forms of life, the health of our communities and food systems, and the safety and dignity of persons in the context of massive climate disruption.
For the first time, we are asking how is it that we have come to accept the kind of instrumental rationality and neoliberal economic and political system that not only dehumanizes us as individuals but will inevitably destroy life as we know it. Those who financially benefit from the system of neoliberal capitalism would have us believe that we cannot change or transform the world into a better, more equal, more caring, environmentally sustainable and responsible place. But the fact is there are individuals and groups emerging and multiplying around the world whose actions demonstrate the neoliberal capitalist worldview is no longer viable. They are doing unprecedented things: putting forth that forward new ways of thinking and doing economics and politics; investing in and building and modes of and ; demanding ; and promoting , governance and sustainable living.
What has become apparent to the rapidly growing numbers who are building alternative ways of living is that capitalism must end. Historically, critiques of capitalism focused on worker alienation and exploitation, imperialism, profound disparities of wealth, market instability and the erosion of democracy. However, all of the latter pale in comparison to the critique of capital based on the very foreseeable potential it has to completely destroy the very conditions of possibility for life itself.
For the first time in the history of humankind, we are forced to admit that gradualism, half-measures and tinkering will no longer suffice. We either completely break with capitalism and the neoliberal ideology that enables it, or we face extinction. Economic and political systems that destroy the Earth, gradually erode human freedom and undermine social, environmental and economic justice only appeared unstoppable because we once saw them as inevitable, necessary or absolute. With the rise of climate change consciousness, we now see them for what they have always been: contingent human choices and deliberate human constructions that we must not accede to any longer. That will require a revolution — not just in thinking and lifestyles but fundamentally in our politics and in our economics.
At the end of his essay Havel concludes that the real question is whether a better future is really all that distant: “What if, on the contrary, it has been here for a long time already, and only our own blindness and weakness has prevented us from seeing it around us and within us, and kept us from developing it?”
What if, indeed.
Please go here for the original article: https://truthout.org/articles/we-must-end-neoliberalism-or-neoliberalism-will-end-us/
Additional Resources
An Excellent Talk Given by George Monbiot:
The Invisible Ideology: Consumerism, Capitalism, and Neoliberalsim
The Invisible Ideology - An amazing talk from the well known author and Guardian journalist George Monbiot. George delves deep into the invisible ideologies trashing our planet. In this video George talks in depth about capitalism, consumerism and neo-liberalism. For the live Q & A with the audience click the link below - https://youtu.be/nN16yWvFcQ0
Two More Excellent Videos:
- This Is Neoliberalism: Introducing the Invisible Ideology (Part I) ― Neoliberalism is an economic ideology that exists within the framework of capitalism. Over four decades ago, neoliberalism become the dominant economic paradigm of global society. In this video series, we'll trace the history of neoliberalism, starting with a survey of neoliberal philosophy and research, a historical reconstruction of the movement pushing for neoliberal policy solutions, witnessing the damage that neoliberalism did to its first victims in the developing world, and then charting neoliberalism's infiltration of the political systems of the United States and the United Kingdom. Learn how neoliberalism is generating crises for humanity at an unprecedented rate. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myH3gg5o0t0)
- This Is Neoliberalism: Keynesian Embedded Liberalism (Part 2) ― Neoliberalism was a reaction. It was an effort to disassemble a previous vision of society that once held sway over most of the world. In order to understand neoliberalism, it’s important to first understand the world before neoliberalism; the world which neoliberalism considered unacceptable, and in need of urgent reconfiguration. Learn about the world of embedded liberalism. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkBpqLWFNg4)
Other Readings:
In George Monbiot's excellent article, "Neoliberalism ― The Ideology at the Root of All Our Problems," he addresses the many devastating impacts of neoliberalism. This is but a glimpse: "Inequality in the distribution of both income and wealth, after 60 years of decline, rose rapidly in this era, due to the smashing of trade unions, tax reductions, rising rents, privatisation and deregulation." (https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot#_=_)
- Naomi Klein's books The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (https://www.amazon.com/Shock-Doctrine-Rise-Disaster-Capitalism/dp/0312427999/ref=sr_1_1?hvadid=241616967346&hvdev=c&hvlocphy=9033603&hvnetw=g&hvqmt=e&hvrand=9077543137560561189&hvtargid=kwd-5724348215&hydadcr=22566_10355099&keywords=shock+doctrine+naomi+klein&qid=1675541215&sr=8-1) and This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs the Climate (https://www.amazon.com/This-Changes-Everything-Capitalism-Climate/dp/1451697392/ref=d_pd_sbs_vft_none_sccl_3_1/137-0149928-2226275?pd_rd_w=pEQCX&content-id=amzn1.sym.1e7a0ba4-f11f-4432-b7d8-1aaa3945be18&pf_rd_p=1e7a0ba4-f11f-4432-b7d8-1aaa3945be18&pf_rd_r=8SCDTZHNQG7D8NSDE5CX&pd_rd_wg=qwsxt&pd_rd_r=e4f83ac5-53e6-42b5-ba09-f4c0a04e6329&pd_rd_i=1451697392&psc=1) are an excellent resources on neoliberalism and its devastating impacts.
- From a book review of A Brief History of Neoliberalism by David Harvey: "It has been part of the genius of neoliberal theory to provide a benevolent mask full of wonderful-sounding words like freedom, liberty, choice, and rights, to hide the grim realities of the restoration or reconstitution of naked class power, locally as well as transnationally, but most particularly in the main financial centres of global capitalism." (https://notes-taken.blogspot.com/2010/07/brief-history-of-neoliberalism-chapter.html)
- In Paul Verhaeghe's article "Neoliberalism has brought out the worst in us," he writes: A neoliberal meritocracy would have us believe that success depends on individual effort and talents, meaning responsibility lies entirely with the individual and authorities should give people as much freedom as possible to achieve this goal. For those who believe in the fairytale of unrestricted choice, self-government and self-management are the pre-eminent political messages, especially if they appear to promise freedom. Along with the idea of the perfectible individual, the freedom we perceive ourselves as having in the west is the greatest untruth of this day and age." (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/29/neoliberalism-economic-system-ethics-personality-psychopathicsthic)
- In "A Short History of Neoliberalism," Susan George writes: "Lest you thought I had forgotten Ronald Reagan, let me illustrate this point with the observations of Kevin Phillips, a Republican analyst and former aid to President Nixon, who published a book in 1990 called The Politics of Rich and Poor. He charted the way Reagan's neo-liberal doctrine and policies had changed American income distribution between 1977 and 1988. These policies were largely elaborated by the conservative Heritage Foundation, the principle think-tank of the Reagan administration and still an important force in American politics. Over the decade of the 1980s, the top 10 percent of American families increased their average family income by 16 percent, the top 5 percent increased theirs by 23 percent, but the extremely lucky top 1 percent of American families could thank Reagan for a 50 percent increase. Their revenues went from an affluent $270.000 to a heady $405.000. As for poorer Americans, the bottom 80 percent all lost something; true to the rule, the lower they were on the scale, the more they lost. The bottom 10 percent of Americans reached the nadir: according to Phillip's figures, they lost 15% of their already meagre incomes: from an already rock-bottom average of $4.113 annually, they dropped to an inhuman $3.504. In 1977, the top 1 percent of American families had average incomes 65 times as great as those of the bottom 10 percent. A decade later, the top 1 percent was 115 times as well off as the bottom decile." (https://www.tni.org/en/article/a-short-history-of-neoliberalism)
No comments:
Post a Comment