 |
| a katz | Shutterstock.com |
This election season has brought to the surface an issue that,
until recently, seemed to have become a neoliberal sacred cow, the holy writ of
the lords of capital: free trade. And while this cornerstone of US economic
hegemony has come under fire from a deeply reactionary, and to varying degrees
racist and xenophobic, perspective, as expressed by Donald Trump, it has
nevertheless sparked a much needed conversation about free trade and its
destructive impact on both the American working class, and the Global South as
well.
But free trade having become a campaign issue has also
spotlighted for the umpteenth time the breathtaking hypocrisy of Hillary
Clinton who I have previously referred
to as the high
priestess of the Church of Free Trade and Neoliberalism. For it is, in fact,
Hillary Clinton who has for more than two decades been one of the loudest and
most resolute voices championing neoliberalism and free trade. And still,
despite her record, Clinton today presents herself as a friend of the working
class. The same working class that has been all but eviscerated by the policies
she herself has supported.
This
is, of course, not to say that Trump is somehow the great defender of workers
and the poor – his long track record as a predatory, racist real estate
developer illustrates his complete lack of concern for oppressed communities
and workers. Still, like a sadistic dentist, Trump has deliberately struck a
nerve in the body politic of the US. For Trump has managed to eschew the
typical right wing cultural wedge issues of gay marriage, abortion, and the
like in favor of the core economic concerns of the working class.
Whatever
one’s opinion of Trump, one can say with certainty that his reintroduction of
the free trade into the national conversation has forced Hillary Clinton onto
the back foot.
Hillary Clinton, NAFTA, and
the Attack on American Workers
“I
think that everybody is in favor of free and fair trade, and I think that NAFTA
is proving its worth.” Or so Hillary Clinton said in 1996, more than two years
after the North American Free Trade Agreement was enacted under her husband’s
administration. At the time one could still labor under the illusion – or
perhaps it was delusion? – that NAFTA was going to benefit workers in the US,
Canada, and Mexico by allowing for the free flow of goods (and capital) leading
to decreased prices for many consumer goods. Indeed, that was precisely the
mythology that was peddled at the time.
While it’s true that many experts and workers alike, especially
those on the Left, were deeply suspicious about the inflated claims of the
glorious benefits of the NAFTA utopia of the future, the concept was made into
policy, and the policy translated into a grim reality for US workers. As the
Economic Policy Institute noted in
2013:
By
establishing the principle that U.S. corporations could relocate production
elsewhere and sell back into the United States, NAFTA undercut the bargaining
power of American workers, which had driven the expansion of the middle class
since the end of World War II. The result has been 20 years of stagnant wages
and the upward redistribution of income, wealth and political power.
Without
question, NAFTA was a direct assault on the US working class. Its repercussions
are still being felt today. As the Economic Policy Institute further explained,
NAFTA had four major negative impacts:
1.
The loss of at least 700,000 jobs due to production moving to Mexico. Some of
the heaviest losses were felt in California, Texas, Michigan and other
manufacturing-dependent states, particularly those in the Rust Belt.
2. Allowed
employers to drive down wages, slash benefits, and undermine and destroy
unions. Because capital could always threaten to simply close up shop and move
to Mexico, workers had little recourse but to accept the assault on their
standards of living.
3. It
devastated the Mexican agricultural and small business sectors which led to the
dislocation of millions of Mexican workers and small farmers, many of whom were
forced to migrate to the US in search of work, thereby creating the immigration
“problem” that Trump and his reactionary base have seized upon.
4. It
was the model free trade agreement, the blueprint upon which others were based.
It laid the foundation for the neoliberal trade model wherein capital reaps the
benefits while labor shoulders the costs.
Please continue this article here: http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/08/10/hillary-clinton-and-the-big-neoliberal-lie/
No comments:
Post a Comment