Gareth Porter: Hillary Clinton and Her Hawks

Clinton's hawkish neoliberal patterns and policies are deeply, deeply disturbing. In saying this, I also need to illuminate that Trump's narcissistic triggers to any form of perceived narcissism injury make him by far the most dangerous. America simply continues to have a long ways to go to truly live up to our ideals and the values we process as cherished. A long ways. And without being authentically aligned with a higher good for our nation, and the world - and instead being wedded to Dark Money, greed, fear, violence, and oppression - we are certainly anything but the greatest nation on earth. Even that belief system that we are "the Greatest!" is rooted in the naricissism of our culture that indoctrinates us from birth into the story that we are better than those "others" in different nations, different cultures, different ethnicities, different religions, etc. May we grow in our capacity to not see ourselves as better than or less than, but as equals. We are all equal, all related, all connected. As we change the story, we will change ourselves and this beautiful and precious world we share. Bless us all. ~ Molly

Some at the convention hold up "no more war" signs. (Photo: Kayla Epstein/The Washington Post)

Focusing on domestic issues, Hillary Clinton’s acceptance speech 

sidestepped the deep concerns anti-war Democrats have about her 

hawkish foreign policy, which is already taking shape in the shadows.

Published on

Friday, July 29, 2016

by

Consortium News

by

Gareth Porter

As Hillary Clinton begins her final charge for the White House, her advisers are already recommending air strikes and other new military measures against the Assad regime in Syria.

The clear signals of Clinton’s readiness to go to war appears to be aimed at influencing the course of the war in Syria as well as U.S. policy over the remaining six months of the Obama administration. (She also may be hoping to corral the votes of Republican neoconservatives concerned about Donald Trump’s “America First” foreign policy.)

Last month, the think tank run by Michele Flournoy, the former Defense Department official considered to be most likely to be Clinton’s choice to be Secretary of Defense, explicitly called for “limited military strikes” against the Assad regime.

And earlier this month Leon Panetta, former Defense Secretary and CIA Director, who has been advising candidate Clinton, declared in an interview that the next president would have to increase the number of Special Forces and carry out air strikes to help “moderate” groups against President Bashal al-Assad. (When Panetta gave a belligerent speech at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday night, he was interrupted by chants from the delegates on the floor of “no more war!”

Flournoy co-founded the Center for New American Security (CNAS) in 2007 to promote support for U.S. war policies in Iraq and Afghanistan, and then became Under Secretary of Defense for Policy in the Obama administration in 2009.

Flournoy left her Pentagon position in 2012 and returned to CNAS as Chief Executive Officer.  She has been described by ultimate insider journalist David Ignatius of the Washington Post, as being on a “short, short list” for the job Secretary of Defense in a Clinton administration.

Please continue this article here: http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/07/29/hillary-clinton-and-her-hawks