This is an important book, and especially right now in our times with the ever present rise of authoritarianism, white Christian nationalism, and fascism. As you read the below quotes, you will clearly see their relevance to today.
And while it is true that many will recognize the authoritarian and fascist threat in Trump, it is also important to remember Bush's words in the aftermath of 9-11: "You're with us or you're with the terrorists." I also recognize today that it isn't just one political party that has brought us such sweeping, sad, and scary crises. The playbook for "strongmen" has been in place for a very long time.
We Americans need to be informed and understand how it is that we've come to the place of multiple profound threats to our nation and the planet. Knowledge and wisdom are powerful when connected with compassion and truth, generosity and love, and consciousness of our interconnection and a higher good for us all.
May we all be passionate seekers of truth and committed to doing our part in an ever increasing and evolving way to heal ourselves and our hurting planetary brothers and sisters and Earth Mother. 🙏 Molly
Many strongmen, past and present, have used populist rhetoric that defines their nations as bound by faith, race, and ethnicity rather than by legal rights. For authoritarians, only some people are "the people," regardless of their birthplace or citizenship status, and only the leader, above and beyond any institution, embodies that group. This is why, in strongman states, attacking the leader is seen as attacking the state itself, and why critics are labeled enemies of the people or terrorists.
From the start, authoritarians stand out from other kinds of politicians by appealing to negative experiences and emotions. They don the cloak of national victimhood, reliving the humiliations of their people by foreign powers as they proclaim themselves their nation’s saviors. Picking up on powerful resentments, hopes, and fears, they present themselves as the vehicle for obtaining what is most wanted, whether it is territory, safety from racial others, securing male authority, or payback for exploitation by internal or external enemies.
Out of the crucible of these years came the cults of victimhood that turned emotions like resentment and humiliation into positive elements of party platforms.
It is [fear] that makes people so willing to follow brash, strong-looking demagogues . . . capable of cleansing the world of the vague, the weak, the uncertain, the evil. Ah, to give oneself over to their direction—what calm, what relief.
* * * * *
The civil war that brought Franco to power started when the center-right refused to accept the results of the February 1936 election that brought a Popular Front government of left-wing parties to power, sparking cycles of violence and rumors of a coup.
The
cults that rose up around Mussolini and Hitler in the early 1920s
answered anxieties about the decline of male status, the waning of
traditional religious authority, and the loss of moral clarity.
The
authoritarian playbook has no chapter on failure. It does not foresee
the leader’s own people turning against him, from military men he
trained to young people he indoctrinated to women he rewarded for having
babies. It has no pages on how to deal with becoming a national
disgrace, someone who is pelted with tomatoes and eggs when he appears
in public after leaving office, like Pinochet, or forced into exile,
like Amin.
Many strongmen who come to power by coup leave it in the same fashion. Two-thirds of dictators were removed by coups between 1950 and 2000.
* * * * *
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (i.e., the reality of experience) and the distinction between true and false (i.e., the standards of thought) no longer exist.
The decay of truth and democratic dissolution proceed hand in hand, starting with the insurgent’s assertion that the establishment media delivers false or biased information while he speaks the truth and risks everything to get the “real facts” out. Once his supporters bond to his person, they stop caring about his falsehoods. They believe him because they believe in him.
Designed for instant impact and encouraging feelings of omnipotence, Twitter is the perfect tool for an impulsive, attention-addicted strongman.
* * * * *
Periods of progress in gender, labor, or racial emancipation have also been fertile terrain for openly racist and sexist aspirants to office, who soothe fears of the loss of male domination and class privilege and the end of White Christian “civilization.” Cultural conservatives have repeatedly gravitated to antidemocratic politics at such junctures of history, enabling dangerous individuals to enter mainstream politics and gain control of government.
Many studies point to recent historical events to explain today’s turn away from democracy, like the 2008 recession and increases in global migration that heightened racist sentiments. Other works go back to the collapse of Communism in 1989–1990. Unleashing nationalist and tribalist sentiments in Eastern Europe, it encouraged the resurgence of the far right in Western Europe as well. Putin, the former Communist functionary who is now a leader of the global right, successfully rode that tide of political upheaval and ideological transformation.
As leaders stabilize their rule, they use propaganda to legitimate their authority. Discrediting the press is a kind of insurance policy. When journalists turn up evidence of the government’s violence or corruption, the public will already be accustomed to seeing them as partisan.
All twenty-first-century authoritarians suppress climate change science, lest that discourage the plunder of national resources that generates profits for them and their allies.
Deutsche Bank has funded authoritarian states from Hitler’s Germany to Putin’s Russia, as well as lending to businesses like the Trump Organization that are suspected of helping autocrats and their cronies to launder their money.
Elites are the authoritarian’s most important promoters and collaborators. Afraid of losing their class, gender, or race privileges, influential individuals bring the insurgent into the political system, thinking that he can be controlled as he solves their problems (which often involves persecuting the left). Once the ruler is in power, elites strike an “authoritarian bargain” that promises them power and security in return for loyalty to the ruler and toleration of his suspension of rights. Some are true believers, and others fear the consequences of subtracting their support, but those who sign on tend to stick with the leader through gross mismanagement, impeachment, or international humiliation.
No comments:
Post a Comment