By Howard Zinn
On this July 4, we would do well to renounce nationalism and all
its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its anthems, its insistence
in song that God must single out America to be blessed.
Is not nationalism—that devotion to a flag, an anthem, a
boundary so fierce it engenders mass murder—one of the great evils of our time,
along with racism, along with religious hatred?
These ways of thinking—cultivated, nurtured, indoctrinated from
childhood on— have been useful to those in power, and deadly for those out of
power.
National spirit can be benign in a country that is small and
lacking both in military power and a hunger for expansion (Switzerland, Norway,
Costa Rica and many more). But in a nation like ours—huge, possessing thousands
of weapons of mass destruction—what might have been harmless pride becomes an
arrogant nationalism dangerous to others and to ourselves.
Our citizenry has been brought up to see our nation as different
from others, an exception in the world, uniquely moral, expanding into other
lands in order to bring civilization, liberty, democracy.
That self-deception started early.
When the first English settlers moved into Indian land in
Massachusetts Bay and were resisted, the violence escalated into war with the
Pequot Indians. The killing of Indians was seen as approved by God, the taking
of land as commanded by the Bible. The Puritans cited one of the Psalms, which
says: “Ask of me, and I shall give thee, the heathen for thine inheritance, and
the uttermost parts of the Earth for thy possession.”
When the English set fire to a Pequot village and massacred men,
women and children, the Puritan theologian Cotton Mather said: “It was supposed
that no less than 600 Pequot souls were brought down to hell that day.”
On the eve of the Mexican War, an American journalist declared
it our “Manifest Destiny to overspread the continent allotted by
Providence.” After the invasion of Mexico began, The New York Herald announced:
“We believe it is a part of our destiny to civilize that beautiful country.”
It was always supposedly for benign purposes that our country
went to war.
We invaded Cuba in 1898 to liberate the Cubans, and went to war
in the Philippines shortly after, as President McKinley put it, “to civilize
and Christianize” the Filipino people.
As our armies were committing massacres in the Philippines (at
least 600,000 Filipinos died in a few years of conflict), Elihu Root, our
secretary of war, was saying: “The American soldier is different from all other
soldiers of all other countries since the war began. He is the advance guard of
liberty and justice, of law and order, and of peace and happiness.”
We see in Iraq that our soldiers are not different. They have,
perhaps against their better nature, killed thousands of Iraq civilians. And
some soldiers have shown themselves capable of brutality, of torture.
Yet they are victims, too, of our government’s lies.
How many times have we heard President Bush tell the troops that
if they die, if they return without arms or legs, or blinded, it is for “liberty,” for
“democracy”?
One of the effects of nationalist thinking is a loss of a sense
of proportion. The killing of 2,300 people at Pearl Harbor becomes the
justification for killing 240,000 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The killing of
3,000 people on September 11 becomes the justification for killing tens of
thousands of people in Afghanistan and Iraq.
And nationalism is given a special virulence when it is said to
be blessed by Providence. Today we have a president, invading two countries in
four years, who announced on the campaign trail in 2004 that God speaks through
him.
We need to refute the idea that our nation is different from,
morally superior to, the other imperial powers of world history.
We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to
any one nation.
Please go here for more:
https://www.howardzinn.org/
Reflective words on a subject very few seem to understand.
ReplyDelete