Wednesday, May 29, 2024

EXCELLENT — ANGELA DAVIS: STANDING WITH PALESTINIANS

I have long recognized Angela Davis as a national and international treasure. And I hold the deepest gratitude, respect, appreciation, and love for her and others who courageously and relentlessly embody the highest integrity, wisdom, commitment to truth, social and political solidarity and activism, relentless challenging of the status quo, and fierce compassion and caring for the welfare of us all. Through those like Angela Davis, I am empowered to question and see through the lies of the reigning ideologies and narratives which are rooted in the longstanding toxicities of colonialism, racism, and patriarchy rather than human rights, truth, and justice. 

May we all be informed and inspired by this wisdom and embracement of love and justice for all. Another world is possible. It is up to us to be unified in this universal struggle for a radically transformed world, one which reflects a commitment to help and protect rather than harm and destroy. And this begins with each and every one of us. I also agree with Angela Davis that "standing with the Palestinian resistance was the best way to fight for a world where we all could be safe." — Molly


Standing With Palestinians

Reflecting on the past 60 years.

By Angela Y. Davis
Spring 2024

Solidarity with Palestinians and their decades-long struggle in defense of their land, culture, and freedom has long been a central theme of my political life. I am gratified to see so many young people — especially young Black people — supporting the struggle in Palestine today. The emotional turbulence so many of us have experienced for the past five months as we’ve witnessed the unprecedented damage the Israeli military has inflicted reminds me just how central the Palestinian quest for justice is to liberation struggles here in the U.S. and in other parts of the world, as well as to my own sense of self in our extremely complicated political world.

The state of Israel is the purveyor not only of a settler-colonial project but also of one that actively continues its violent expansion in the 21st century. Over the past months we have witnessed widespread, unnecessary death and extraordinary devastation that has led to the uprooting of practically the entire population of Gaza. Massive demonstrations all over the planet and deep collective grief about the conditions in Gaza have turned my attention back to the emotion-laden political mobilizations during the summer of 2020. People everywhere, including in Palestine, felt both rage and profound sadness at the racist police lynching of George Floyd. Some might say that the issues driving the George Floyd mobilizations and the current protests against the war on Gaza are different. But are they?

The collective mourning elicited by the racist violence that claimed the lives of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and so many others galvanized demonstrations aimed at the systems, structures, and histories that enabled such racist state violence. And those demonstrations were implicitly directed at the global imperialism that furthers the proliferation of racial capitalist strategies. Some of the protests also highlighted the lessons the U.S. has learned as a direct result of its close alliance with Israel, which has included trainings offered by the Israel Defense Forces to U.S. police departments all over the country. Whether or not the Minnesota police ever directly learned combat moves from the IDF, the increased militarization of policing here is directly related to global capitalism, including the economic and military ties between Israel and the U.S.

Israel’s genocidal war against the Palestinian people in Gaza — who, along with those in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and inside Israel itself, have been conscripted to serve as involuntary embodiments of the foundational enemy of Israel — has produced unimaginable grief and sorrow. Gazan families will never fully recover from the deaths of their loved ones, from the destruction of their homes (as many as 70 percent of homes and more than half of all buildings have been damaged or destroyed), from their monthslong attempts to survive without food and water, or from sleeping in the open as human counterparts of the scarred landscape, which may not recover in the foreseeable future. The vicious and dehumanizing verbal assaults by representatives of the government and armed forces have compounded this trauma. In announcing a “complete siege” of Gaza, the Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant, announced: “There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel. Everything is closed.” He justified this action by adding, “We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.” The international press widely quoted these remarks in the aftermath of the Oct. 7 assault by Hamas.

These atrocities, according to the charges South Africa brought before the International Court of Justice, have acquired genocidal proportions. But amid all of this, we have witnessed the rise of an unprecedented degree of global resistance and solidarity with Gazans and Palestinians. Like many others during these heartbreaking times, I have been encouraged by the leadership proffered by Jewish Voice for Peace, IfNotNow, and other progressive Jewish organizations. Their dramatic presence in the movement is a reminder that binary constructions obscure more accurate and nuanced understandings of what it means to engage in freedom quests.

I was fortunate to witness Jewish solidarity with Palestine, however minoritized, during the early history of the state of Israel, which coincided with my undergraduate years at Brandeis University. My own lifelong sense of solidarity with Palestine is rooted in those experiences of my young political life. I learned the moral value of political solidarity and what it means to express that solidarity not only as a minority position within a larger progressive community but also through a deep identification with those who have been designated as enemies. Solidarity is never entirely straightforward, but in this situation, it requires us to reach beyond simplistic explanations that attribute positions of moral rectitude to one side and utter depravity to the other. Solidarity commands us to recognize the fallacious either/or construction that effectively forbids the proximity of positions of solidarity for Palestine and of deep and heartfelt condemnations of antisemitism.

In the process of reflecting on the meaning of solidarity, I have also learned over the years how dangerous it is to objectify one’s perceived enemies such that nothing they do or say can ever change or even challenge the qualities they are assumed to embody. It is always easy to defer to prevailing discourses that rely on these objectifications, and I think that most of us (myself included) have given in to such pressures at times. Colonialism, racism, and patriarchy all thrive on such capitulations.

But some of us have had the good fortune to have been presented with alternative ways of understanding, critical engagements that question the ideological underpinnings of what we are confronting. I am thankful to many people in the various collective movements and organizations to which I have belonged — the Communist Party USA, L.A. SNCC, Black Panther Political Party, Black Panther Party, Socialist German Students’ Union, Black Women’s Health Project, and others too numerous to name — for having pointed me and others in more productive directions, regardless of the consequences for their own lives. I have always gravitated toward those who are prepared to challenge the status quo. And I am grateful to those who have offered support when I have come under attack personally.

In 2018, the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute offered me a human rights award named after Fred Shuttlesworth, a co-founder of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and then rescinded the honor because of my activism in support of Palestine. Before I even had the opportunity to decide what my response would be, Jewish Voice for Peace and other progressive Jewish organizations began to organize.

Their support was especially important, because it was clear that I was not being targeted as an individual. Several months after the rescission of the award, Representative Ilhan Omar was singled out by Donald Trump, who misrepresented her as he argued that she was insufficiently critical of the perpetrators of 9/11 and accused her of antisemitism because of her principled support of Palestine. Scholar and activist Barbara Ransby and others organized an outdoor convergence and protest in Washington, D.C., to support Omar, alongside her fellow representatives Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. In November 2018, CNN fired academic and activist Marc Lamont Hill because he had used the phrase “from the river to the sea” at a UN meeting on the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People. His firing prefigured Zionists’ widespread contemporary effort to ban a rallying call that for many, in the words of Tlaib, is “an aspirational call for freedom, human rights, and peaceful coexistence, not death, destruction, or hate.”

Palestinian solidarity protesters in the Bay Ridge neighborhood of Brooklyn, N.Y., Oct. 21, 2023. Photograph by Christopher Lee for Hammer & Hope.
It was clear then that the Zionist lobby was stepping up its offensive because it had been losing ground. During and after the 2014 Ferguson protests, young Black activists and their supporters had begun to fiercely challenge the ideological representation of Israel as the central outpost of democracy in the Middle East, which had to be defended at all costs. The longstanding work of Palestinian activists Linda Sarsour, Ahmad Abuzaid and others to develop productive alliances that could amplify Black solidarity with Palestine and further cultivate internationalism within the Black Lives Matter movement began to resonate broadly. The Dream Defenders, founded in Florida by Phillip Agnew, Ahmad Abuznaid, and Gabriel Pendas in the aftermath of Trayvon Martin’s murder, not only brought Palestinian Americans and African Americans together in an organization that identifies as abolitionist, feminist, and socialist but also has organized a number of delegations to Palestine. I see a direct line connecting this recent history — and, of course, all the history linking Black and Palestinian movements since the Nakba in 1948 — with the rising numbers of Black people who now refuse to toe the Democratic Party line on support for Israel.

As radical advocates and activists, we don’t often have the opportunity to experience the changes for which we struggle; instead we expect that our work will affirm new starting points for generations to come. But sometimes, if we manage to live long enough, we may also have the good fortune of experiencing the transformative impact of struggles in which we have participated. When I first heard the news that the Fred Shuttlesworth Human Rights Award was being rescinded as a response to my Palestine activism, I felt unable to breathe — as if this blow had literally knocked the wind out of my body — which was why my statement at the time indicated that I was “stunned.” That feeling soon dissipated, however, as many expressions of solidarity from all over the world, including from organizations of rabbis and other Jewish formations, began to circulate. Overwhelmingly supportive responses from Black and other politically progressive organizations reminded me that freedom work, even when it may not appear to be making an appreciable difference, can lead to profound and transformative results.

Though the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute’s gala had been canceled, community activists, together with the mayor and other city officials, came together to organize a public event at the Boutwell Auditorium that probably attracted 10 times more people than the fund-raiser would have. For me personally and politically, this event occasioned a rare and deep-seated sense of collective triumph. In this historical bastion of racist segregation where I had been born and grew up — the Johannesburg of the South — a vast collection of people of different racial, religious, and cultural backgrounds attested to the weakening influence of Zionist ideology. When I looked out into the audience from the stage, I saw so many of my childhood friends, a number of whom had helped organize this gathering, protesting the BCRI decision, and all of whom were putting their bodies on the line by showing up en masse.

Before visiting Birmingham, I had traveled to Waltham, Mass., to participate in the 50th anniversary celebration of the Department of African and African American Studies at Brandeis. Students at Brandeis during the early 1960s were constantly reminded that Israel was founded in 1948, the same year Brandeis was established. While none of us could avoid the pervasive Zionism, I was grateful to have a Jewish roommate during my first year who constantly steered me to think critically about the representation of Israel as the only possible defense for the global Jewish community. She turned my attention to the condition of Palestinians, who were being systematically divested of their land, their rights, and their future. She also helped me to understand that standing with the Palestinian resistance was the best way to fight for a world where we could all be safe.

I invoke my own experience at Brandeis because despite its perpetuation of the claim that Palestinians embody a continuing existential threat to Israel (it was the first private university to ban a Students for Justice in Palestine campus chapter), I do not remember any major conflicts around this issue during my time there. But I do recall many subterranean conversations about the impact of this militaristic nation-building process on the Palestinian people. What I now deeply appreciate is that I retained crucial insights regarding the kinship between racism and antisemitism (violent white supremacists dynamited Black churches and homes in my natal city of Birmingham and targeted a synagogue), and these insights continued to lead me to the people I organized with and the people with whom I socialized. They were not displaced by my evolving consciousness of the dangers of Zionism.

After I graduated from Brandeis in 1965, I traveled to Frankfurt, Germany, to study with Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and others associated with the Institute for Social Research at the University of Frankfurt. Shortly after arriving, I became involved with the Socialist German Students’ Union (SDS). This was precisely when SDS began to turn away from Israel and toward solidarity with the Arab states challenging Israel. A few days before the outbreak of the 1967 war, the police killed a student named Benno Ohnesorg while he attended an SDS protest against the shah of Iran’s visit to Berlin. Fascist police violence happened at the same time as the Israeli army’s aggression. This led the SDS to create an interesting connection between supporting Third World Liberation efforts (including solidarity with Palestine) and challenging police violence and other forms of state repression within what was then West Germany. That a student could be killed for participating in peaceful protests provided clear evidence that West Germany had not overcome the dangers of fascism.

Angela Davis speaks at a Free Huey rally in DeFremery Park in Oakland, Calif., Nov. 12, 1969. Standing next to Davis is James Burford. Photograph by Stephen Shames.
After I returned to the U.S. in the fall of 1967, I was determined to find my way into the revolutionary Black Liberation Movement, and I reconnected with Herbert Marcuse, my Brandeis mentor, who was now teaching at UC San Diego. My experiences in Germany — especially among students from Africa and other parts of what was then known as the Third World — had consolidated my embrace of revolutionary internationalism, and I gravitated toward organizations and individuals who shared that identification. At a time of growing global solidarity with Third World struggles, all of the groups I worked with — the Communist Party, the Black Panther Party, and the Los Angeles chapter of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) — were absolutely clear about their solidarity with Palestine. During that period, I participated in a series of exciting and enlightening political conversations with James Forman, who was then the international affairs director of SNCC. At that time, SNCC encouraged its members to study the situation in the Middle East; the organization insisted that making significant progress in our domestic struggles required us to embrace internationalism. In a letter Forman wrote to the executive secretary of SNCC during the 1967 war, he explained:

The class struggle in the black community will become sharper if the war continues. Obviously the “gut” reaction in many people is against Israel and for the Arabs, reflecting the black-white tension, the hardening of racism, and the particular circumstances in which we find ourselves in this country. However, it becomes very necessary for those of us in the organization, especially those of us in leadership positions, to study the historical development and the contemporary economic policies of Israel. Actually Israel represents an extension of United State foreign policy as well as an attempt by the Zionists to create a homeland for the Jews. The latter merges with the former in many countries, especially the United States, Great Britain, and France in some respects.

When the FBI arrested me in October 1970, I could not have predicted that my own political proximity to Palestine would increase exponentially. Of the many expressions of solidarity forwarded to me during my imprisonment, I was most deeply moved by the messages emanating from prisons. I can still remember how humbled I felt upon receiving a beautiful letter of solidarity signed by Palestinian political prisoners. The letter had been smuggled out of an Israeli jail and transmitted to my lawyers, who brought it into the California jail where I was being held. Some 40 years later, when I joined a solidarity delegation to Palestine of women of color and indigenous scholar-activists, I met a Palestinian activist who told me that he was one of the imprisoned people who had signed that solidarity message so many years ago. When we embraced, I experienced a profound sense of satisfaction with the trajectory of my life and how it has intersected with so many others around the world who again and again collectively generate the hope that radical transformation is being inscribed on the agendas of our futures.

Today the unceasing military assaults on Gaza are reason for deep despair, especially as we learn every day about a loss of life and community destruction that is unprecedented in comparison to all recent wars. Despite the obvious need for a cease-fire — a permanent cease-fire — the U.S. government continues to lend aid and support to Israel. Young activists today are trying to unravel this conundrum, even as the government and both major political parties remain in thrall to Zionism. Despite efforts to persuade the public that any critique or even questioning of the state of Israel is equivalent to antisemitism, astute young people, including radical Jewish activists, are pointing out that the most effective struggles against antisemitism are necessarily linked to opposition to racism, Islamophobia, and other modes of repression and discrimination. This is the first time in my own political memory that the Palestine solidarity movement is experiencing such broad support both throughout the U.S. and all over the world. Here in the United States, despite the McCarthyist strategies employed against those who call for freedom and justice for Palestine on campuses, in the entertainment industry, and elsewhere, we are in a new political moment, and we cannot — we must not — capitulate to those who represent the interests of racial capitalism and the legacies of colonialism. As June Jordan wrote in “Poem for South African Women”:

           And who will join this standing up
    and the ones who stood without sweet company
    will sing and sing
    back into the mountains and
    if necessary
    even under the sea

    we are the ones we have been waiting for

Please go here for the original article: https://hammerandhope.org/article/angela-davis-palestinians-gaza


Angela Davis in Paris, France, March 2013. Photograph by Richard Dumas/Agence VU/Redux.

Norman Finkelstein: CONSPIRACIES DO HAPPEN


MAY 28, 2024

The British Guardian reported today that Israeli secret services were blackmailing former ICC Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. Already four years ago I wrote a full book documenting Bensouda’s disgraceful record of whitewashing Israel.

It was perfectly obvious at the time that extra-legal pressures were being exerted on Bensouda. Indeed, I stated in the very last sentence of my book that Israel was bringing “to bear every squalid and sordid instrument in its arsenal” against the ICC. It was also obvious that extra-legal pressures were exerted on Richard Goldstone to recant his milestone report on Israeli crimes in Gaza, even as “Goldstone’s secret will perhaps never be revealed” (from my book Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom). It is also my considered opinion that ICC Judge Peter Kovacs was subject to extra-legal pressures or enticements and current ICJ Vice-President Julia Sebutinde has been subject to extra-legal pressures or enticements by Israel. At the very least, Israel has assisted their whitewashing endeavors. (The flagrant, shameful and shameless lie that former ICJ president Joan Donaghue uttered on BBC last month—she purported that the ICJ did not find that Israel was “plausibly” committing genocide in Gaza--was morally debased but almost certainly traced back to careerism and opportunism, not Israeli dirty tricks.) One of the redemptive aspects of the current horrible moment is that a lot of the dirt is finally coming out. It was, for example, always assumed, but couldn’t be proven, that a class of Jewish supremacist billionaires acting at Israel’s behest were exerting financial pressures on academia. The machinations of the Ackmans, Krafts, Sternlichts et al. have now been exposed. If the Harvard Corporation wouldn’t let the 13 anti-genocide students attend graduation, was it not because “he who pays the piper calls the tune”?

Please go here for the original: https://normanfinkelstein.substack.com/p/conspiracies-do-happen

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Frances Moore Lappé: “Vegetarian”…Why Not “Planetarian”?

This is an excellent article. I first read and used delicious recipes from Diet For a Small Planet when it initially came out in 1971, which deeply impacted me. Since then I have seen its author speak and over the years have read many of her articles and books. And I hold the wisdom and strong voice of truth and love of Frances Moore Lappé with the highest gratitude, respect, and appreciation. For the past 18 years I have been vegetarian. Many of the reasons why are highlighted here in this piece. May we all, individually and collectively, continue to evolve in the ways we think, believe, and act which reflects consciousness of the highest good of us all, humans and nonhumans alike. We are all related, all connected, all family. We can all strive to increasingly embody what it is to be planetarians. Another world is truly possible. — Molly

"As a vegetarian, I've loved knowing I was protecting animals and avoiding massive waste. But now I wonder whether 'vegetarian' captures the full impact of such food choices. So, what if we reconceive good eating as not just 'plant-based,' but 'planet-healing'?"


Only with democracy—specifically a living democracy—can we transform our wasteful, destructive food system to ensure everyone’s fair access to healthy, ecologically grown food.

By FRANCES MOORE LAPPÉ 

"Planetarian. What’s 
that?”

I am eager to explain. In the late sixties, as I struggled to find my path, Paul Ehrlich’s Population Bomb had just exploded, admonishing humanity for overpopulating the Earth and creating food scarcity. Soon, several friends even pledged never to have kids.

So, I had to know: Was Ehrlich right?

I dug in at U.C. Berkeley’s agricultural library with my dad’s slide rule in hand, asking: Is it true that we’re running out of food?

No. Emphatically no, I soon learned.

We did then—and do now—produce enough food for all. Yet decade after decade we turn abundance into scarcity for too many: Today, 1.3 billion people—1 in 6 of us—lack consistent access to the calories we need. And safe and healthy diets? They’re out of reach for almost 40 percent of humanity, and the crisis is predicted to worsen.

Why?

Simply put, our world’s gross power inequities—political and economic—are the root cause. As the richest 1 percent control about half the world’s wealth, food policies serve elite interests, not commonsense or our planet’s health.

When our dietary habits incorporate environmental, justice, and health awareness as well as animal welfare, might we be "planetarians"?

One result? Staggering inefficiency.

Humans directly eat only about half the calories we produce. And the other half? While some become biofuel, in the U.S. we devote three-fourths of agricultural land to livestock production. And, of every 100 feed calories that cows eat, we get only three calories back in that burger or steak on our plate. With dairy cows, we get less than half the calories they’re fed.

The big picture?

Worldwide, almost 80 percent of our agricultural land produces livestock that give us only 18 percent of our calories.

Other costs include vast environmental harms: Producing animal foods generates greenhouse gas emissions 10 to 60 times greater than producing plant-based foods. Plus, 60 percent of biodiversity loss worldwide is caused by livestock. Moreover, livestock grazing is responsible for almost 40 percent of global deforestation, worsening the climate and biodiversity crises. Natural historian David Attenborough warns us we are facing the 6th great species extinction, which requires a dietary shift toward plant food.

Plus, “industrialized livestock” generate 85 percent of soil erosion, also a major threat.

Next, water. Our heating climate diminishes fresh water supplies; yet to produce just one pound of beef we use 1,800 gallons of water. Globally, “animal agriculture” accounts for nearly a fifth of all freshwater use. Here in the U.S. cattle farming uses more than half the water drawn from the Colorado River, for example, even as area’s current water crisis already threatens many farms and puts dozens of fish species at risk.

Meat-centered diets also directly damage our health: In 2015, the WHO declared red meat a probable carcinogen and processed meat a carcinogen.

In sharp contrast, plant-centered diets have been shown to lower body weight, boost the immune system, and decrease cancer risk, coronary heart disease, and Type 2 diabetes. So, no surprise: A plant-centered diet is associated with “lower risk of all-cause mortality” in U.S. adults.

It makes no sense. Why would we humans—supposedly the brightest species—actively shrink our food supply?

Why?

Because the deeper scarcity we’ve failed to address is that of democracy. On political rights and civil liberties, Freedom House—confounded by Eleanor Roosevelt—ranks us way behind nations we think of as peers. The U.S. comes in 59th between Panama and Samoa. Yet, only with democracy can we transform our wasteful, destructive food system to ensure everyone’s fair access to healthy, ecologically grown food.

Thus, much of my life energies have gone toward what I call “living democracy” in which we each have both economic and political power.

So, how does shifting my diet serve democracy?

In nourishing ourselves we make multiple choices daily. That alone gives food special power. With each choice I know I am sending signals back through the food chain for sane, fair use of our Earth.

Suddenly, my every bite has delicious purpose. As a vegetarian, I’ve loved knowing I was protecting animals and avoiding massive waste. But now I wonder whether “vegetarian” captures the full impact of such food choices. So, what if we reconceive good eating as not just “plant-based,” but “planet-healing”?

When our dietary habits incorporate environmental, justice, and health awareness as well as animal welfare, might we be "planetarians"?

I believe that with every step aligning our lives with our deepest truths, we become more convincing to ourselves and thus to others—and more likely to take our next step and the next…with ever greater courage. And that’s exactly what our planet needs now more than ever.

So, “planetarian” feels great.

Please go here for the original article: https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/vegetarian-planetarian-food-choice-democracy

David Korten — The Essential Corporate Transition: From Imperial Shareholders to Community Stakeholders

 The work of David Korten has long been invaluable 
and a deep gift to us all. — Molly

David Korten | May 23, 2024

The global interdependence of modern society requires that we work together in historically unprecedented ways to secure the wellbeing of all in every aspect of life. More than four centuries ago, we invented the legal instrument of the corporation as an institutional form to bring large numbers of people together around a unified purpose.

This instrument was originally created to pursue new opportunities presented by the imperial era of the time. Its specific form was consistent with the wishes of the imperial rulers then in charge.

The context has now changed dramatically. We have a continuing need for institutional forms that facilitate large scale cooperation. But we must rethink and redefine the corporate form in ways appropriate to our current needs and circumstances.

As defined by The American Heritage Dictionary, the corporation is:  

"An entity such as a business, municipality, or organization that involves more than one person but that has met the legal requirements to operate as a single person, so that it may enter into contracts and engage in transactions under its own identity."

Corporations can take many forms. These include for-profit businesses, governmental entities, and private non-profits. If it is a for-profit business, its ownership shares may be privately held or publicly traded.

A corporation can centralize and monopolize control of virtually unlimited assets in the hands of individual owners who control the voting shares. Or it can localize and distribute the powers of ownership among many thousands of stakeholders with a natural concern for the wellbeing of the community in which the corporation operates. The Mondragon Cooperative in the Basque region of Spain is a leading example of the latter.

To discuss and address such foundational options in a meaningful way, we must give them conceptually meaningful names.

The World Economic Forum brings together the world leaders of business, government, and civil society to dialogue on global issues. Klaus Schwab, its founder and executive chairman, calls attention to an essential distinction between Shareholder Capitalism devoted to maximizing corporate profits and Stakeholder Capitalism devoted to the wellbeing of all stakeholders in the communities in which the corporation does business.

Advancing a global economy on the community stakeholder model is for Schwab a defining life cause. His foundational distinction is readily applied to the corporations that make up a global economy, thus giving us names for two specific corporate types.  

  • Imperial Shareholder Corporations are structured to maximize profits under control of and for the personal benefit of hyper-wealthy owners. They support authoritarian rule.
  • Community Stakeholder Corporations are structured to distribute and localize power to secure the wellbeing of communities in which the corporation does businessThey support deep democracy.

Imperial Shareholder Corporations trace their history back to the tradition and structure of the English East India Company, a corporation created and managed to exercise monopoly power in service to an imperial agenda. Such corporations can give enormous power to those who control them.  

The history of this currently dominant corporate form traces back to1600, when Queen Elizabeth I granted a group of private investors a legal charter giving them an initial 15-year monopoly on all English trade with India and East and Southeast Asia. This original corporate charter created the English East India Company, which later became the British East India Company.

As it amassed human, financial, and military resources in service to the British Empire’s colonial expansion and exploitation, the British East India Company came to virtually rule India from the early 18th century until the British Crown dissolved it in 1858. For further detail, see this account of “How the East India Company Became the World’s Most Powerful Monopoly.”

At one point this company commanded a private army of 260,000 soldiers, twice the size of Britain’s standing army at the time. Beginning in the early 1620s, the British East India Company became active in the global slave trade, transporting slaves from Africa to provide conscripted labor for the company’s operations in Asia. It imported tea from China for sale in Britain financed by illegal opium exports to China. When China rebelled against the opium trade, the British government responded with war ships. Britain’s victory led to the British takeover of Hong Kong.

A few owners of contemporary Imperial Shareholder Corporations use their control to align their corporate assets in service to the wellbeing of the communities in which they do business. Yvon Chouinard, founder of Patagonia outdoor recreation clothing is a leading example. Unfortunately, these are exceptions. And maintaining a commitment to community service is difficult for an Imperial Shareholder Corporation. Owners inevitably become incapacitated and die. New owners may not share the previous owner’s social commitment.

A Community Stakeholder Corporation organized as a worker/community cooperative distributes ownership among many owners who live in the communities in which that corporation does business and who share a natural concern for the wellbeing of those communities. In the cooperative model, each owner owns one share and has one vote. That share can only be sold back to the cooperative for sale to another qualifying community member. This corporate ownership structure is equitable, democratic, aligns decision makers with community wellbeing, and is well secured against external takeover.

We have many examples of relatively small businesses converting to worker-owned cooperatives. I am not aware, however, of any example of the conversion of a major Imperial Shareholder Corporation into a Community Stakeholder Corporation. The need to change this becomes increasingly urgent. Just in the consumer goods economic sector, transfer of brand ownership in recent years has consolidated the ownership of more than 550 familiar brands in the hands of the controlling owners of just 12 companies.

The Community Stakeholder Corporation is an institution essential to the wellbeing of modern society. By contrast, Imperial Shareholder Corporations are an illegitimate institutional form from an imperial past we must now put behind us. It is time to break them up and convert them to worker/community ownership as part of a larger agenda of equitable wealth redistribution.

Bear in mind that human institutions are human creations. Their only legitimate purpose is to secure and enhance our human well-being. If an institution is not fulfilling this purpose, it is our public duty to transform or eliminate it.

We now witness growing calls to break up corporate conglomerates to restore some semblance of market competition. Not only must these corporations be broken up to restore market competition. We must also convert the individual companies to structures that assure ownership is shared and deeply connected to a commitment to the wellbeing of the communities in which they do business.

https://davidkorten.org/

Wendell Berry: A Spiritual Journey

Photo by Molly

 A Spiritual Journey

And the world cannot be discovered
by a journey of miles,
no matter how long,
but only by a spiritual journey,
a journey of one inch,
very arduous and humbling and joyful,
by which we arrive at the ground
at our feet, and learn
to be at home.

— Wendell Berry

Monday, May 27, 2024

Howard Zinn: Whom Will We Honor Memorial Day?

 

The gravesite at West Point of my paternal grandfather, 
Brigadier General Frederick Smith Strong, Jr.,
who would have respected the words and 
wisdom of Howard Zinn.

By Howard Zinn

Published on June 2, 1976 in the Boston Globe and republished in The Zinn Reader with the brief introduction below.

Memorial Day will be celebrated … by the usual betrayal of the dead, by the hypocritical patriotism of the politicians and contractors preparing for more wars, more graves to receive more flowers on future Memorial Days. The memory of the dead deserves a different dedication. To peace, to defiance of governments.

In 1974, I was invited by Tom Winship, the editor of the Boston Globe, who had been bold enough in 1971 to print part of the top secret Pentagon Papers on the history of the Vietnam War, to write a bi-weekly column for the op-ed page of the newspaper. I did that for about a year and a half. The column below appeared June 2, 1976, in connection with that year’s Memorial Day. After it appeared, my column was cancelled.

* * * * *

Memorial Day will be celebrated as usual, by high-speed collisions of automobiles and bodies strewn on highways and the sound of ambulance sirens throughout the land.

It will also be celebrated by the display of flags, the sound of bugles and drums, by parades and speeches and unthinking applause.

It will be celebrated by giant corporations, which make guns, bombs, fighter planes, aircraft carriers and an endless assortment of military junk and which await the $100 billion in contracts to be approved soon by Congress and the President.

There was a young woman in New Hampshire who refused to allow her husband, killed in Vietnam, to be given a military burial. She rejected the hollow ceremony ordered by those who sent him and 50,000 others to their deaths. Her courage should be cherished on Memorial Day. There were the B52 pilots who refused to fly those last vicious raids of Nixon’s and Kissinger’s war. Have any of the great universities, so quick to give honorary degrees to God-knows-whom, thought to honor those men at this Commencement time, on this Memorial Day?

No politician who voted funds for war, no business contractor for the military, no general who ordered young men into battle, no FBI man who spied on anti-war activities, should be invited to public ceremonies on this sacred day. Let the dead of past wars be honored. Let those who live pledge themselves never to embark on mass slaughter again.

“The shell had his number on it. The blood ran into the ground. . .Where his chest ought to have been they pinned the Congressional Medal, the DSC, the Medaille Militaire, the Belgian Croix de Guerre, the Italian gold medal, The Vitutea Militara sent by Queen Marie of Rumania. All the Washingtonians brought flowers .. Woodrow Wilson brought a bouquet of poppies.”

Those are the concluding lines of John Dos Passos angry novel 1919. Let us honor him on Memorial Day.

And also Thoreau, who went to jail to protest the Mexican War.

And Mark Twain, who denounced our war against the Filipinos at the turn of the century.

And I. F. Stone, who virtually alone among newspaper editors exposed the fraud and brutality of the Korean War.

Let us honor Martin Luther King, who refused the enticements of the White House, and the cautions of associates, and thundered against the war in Vietnam.

Memorial Day should be a day for putting flowers on graves and planting trees. Also, for destroying the weapons of death that endanger us more than they protect us, that waste our resources and threaten our children and grandchildren.

On Memorial Day we should take note that, in the name of “defense,” our taxes have been used to spend a quarter of a billion dollars on a helicopter assault ship called “the biggest floating lemon,” which was accepted by the Navy although it had over 2,000 major defects at the time of its trial cruise.

Meanwhile, there is such a shortage of housing that millions live in dilapidated sections of our cities and millions more are forced to pay high rents or high interest rates on their mortgages. There’s 90 billion for the B1 bomber, but people don’t have money to pay hospital bills.

We must be practical, say those whose practicality has consisted of a war every generation. We mustn’t deplete our defenses. Say those who have depleted our youth, stolen our resources. In the end, it is living people, not corpses, creative energy, not destructive rage, which are our only real defense, not just against other governments trying to kill us, but against our own, also trying to kill us.

Let us not set out, this Memorial Day, on the same old drunken ride to death.

Please go here for the original article: https://www.zinnedproject.org/materials/whom-will-we-honor-memorial-day/

Saturday, May 25, 2024

Francis Weller: An Apprenticeship with Sorrow

 So powerful, wise, and true.
🙏 Molly


“This night will pass, then we have work to do."
— Rumi

Grief and loss touch us all, arriving at our door in many ways. They come swirling on the winds of divorce, tucked into the news of the death of someone dear, as an illness that alters the course of a life.  For many of us, grief is tied intimately to the ravages we witness daily to watersheds and forests, the extinction of species, the collapse of democracy and the fading of civilization.  Left unattended, these sorrows darken our days.  It is our unexpressed sorrows, the congested stories of loss that, when left untouched, block our access to the vitality of the soul.  To freely move in and out of the soul’s inner chambers, we must first clear the way.   This requires finding meaningful ways to speak of sorrow. This requires an apprenticeship with sorrow.  Learning to welcome, hold and metabolize sorrow is the work of a lifetime.

Our apprenticeship begins as we come to understand that grief is ever-present in our lives.  This is a difficult realization, but one that carries the opportunity of opening our heart to a deeper love for our singular life and for the wind-swept world of which we are a part.  We begin by simply picking up the shards of grief that lie littered on the floor of our house.  Nothing special.  Nothing heroic.  Not unlike young novices entering an apprenticeship with the master teacher, we begin humbly—sweeping the shavings, mixing the pigments, cleaning the brushes, tending the fires.  We begin the process by building our capacity to hold sorrow in the womb of the heart.  Through this practice, we become able to welcome the pervasive and encompassing presence of grief.

Grief works us in profound ways, reshaping us
moment by moment in the heat of loss.
We are also asked to work grief and to take
                 up our apprenticeship with fidelity and love.                           
Tremendous psychic strength is required to engage the wild images, searing emotions, chaotic dreams, grief-stained memories, and visceral sensations that arise in times of deep grief.  We must build soul muscle to meet these times with anything resembling affection.  The apprenticeship is long.

Grief is more than an emotion; it is also a faculty of being human.  Grieving is a skill that must be developed or we will find ourselves migrating to the margins of our lives in hope of avoiding the inevitable entanglements with loss.  It is through the rites of grieving that we are ripened as human beings.  Grief invites gravity and depth into our world.  We possess the profound capacity to metabolize sorrow into something medicinal for our soul and the soul of the community.  The skill of grieving well enables us to become current—to live in the present moment and feel the electricity of life.  We gradually turn our attention to what is here, now, and less to our need to repair history.  We remember we are more verb than noun, more a jumpy rhythm, a wild song, a fluid leap than a fixed thing in space.  As Spanish poet Jaime Gil de Biedma said, “I believed I wanted to be a poet, but deep down I just wanted to be a poem.”

This apprenticeship is, at heart, about the shaping
of elders, the ones capable of meeting the 
pain and suffering of the world with a
dignified and robust bearing.

After years of walking alongside grief, working with its difficult cargo, we gradually come to see how we have been reshaped by this companionship.  We see how we have cultivated a greater interior space to hold more of what life brings to us.  What slowly emerges from this long apprenticeship, this vigil with sorrow, is a spaciousness capable of holding it all—the beauty and the loss, the despair and the yearning, the fear and the love. We become immense: 
the apprenticeship patiently crafts an elder

After years of holding steady with sorrow, a distillation of wisdom occurs.  We develop a capacity to see in the darkness and find there, in the depths of it all, something holy, something eternal.  We touch the indwelling sacredness of the life we inhabit, digesting bitterness and returning* with a determination to feed the community.  We become a hive of imagination, dispensing what we have gathered over this extended education of the heart.  What was learned was not meant for us alone, but was meant to be tossed like seed into a fertile mind, a waiting community, a hungry culture.

Elders are a composite of contradictions: fierce and forgiving, joyful and melancholy, intense and spacious, solitary and communal.  They have been seasoned by a long fidelity to love and loss.  We become elders by accepting life on life’s terms, gradually relinquishing the fight to have it fit our expectations.  Elders have no quarrel with the ways of the world.  Initiated through many years of loss, they have come to know that life is hard, riddled with failures, betrayals and deaths.  They have made peace with the imperfections inherent in life.  The wounds and losses they encounter become the material with which to shape a life of meaning, humor, joy, depth, and beauty.  They do not push away suffering, nor wish to be exempt from the inevitable losses that come.  They know the futility of such a wish.  This acceptance frees them to radically receive the stunning elegance of the world.

Ultimately, each elder is a storehouse of living memory, a carrier of wisdom. Theirs are the voices that rise on behalf of the commons, at times fiery, at times beseeching.  They live outside culture yet are its greatest protectors, becoming wily dispensers of love and blessings.  They offer a resounding “Yes” to the generations that follow.  That is their legacy and gift.

When the season is right, when we have been tempered sufficiently by the heat of life, we are asked to take up the mantle of elderhood as the most ordinary of things.  Nothing special about it.  It is ordinary to know loss and sorrow, to be pulled below the surface of life and be reshaped by the currents of grief.  It is ordinary to be deepened by the draw of sorrow and its intense wash, clearing away old debris and outdated strategies.  It is ordinary to feel the aperture of the heart open because of our intimacy with grief.  No longer blinded by the allure of being special, we are free to take our place in the world, casting blessings by the simple offer of our presence, seasoned by sorrow.

This is how elders are crafted: tempered
between the heat of loss and the 
weight of loving this world.
  
We are all preparing for our own disappearance, our one last breath.  It is difficult to pick up this thread and hold it in our hand.  Each of us is fated to leave this shining world, to slip off this elegant coat of skin, to release our stories to the wind and return our bones to the earth.  Saying goodbye, however, is not easy or something we give much thought to in our daily lives. 

How do we say goodbye?  How do we acknowledge all that has held beauty and value in our lives—those we love, those who touched our lives with kindness, those whose shelter allowed us to extend ourselves into the world?  How do we let go of sunsets and making love, of pomegranates and walks on the bluff?  Yet, we must.  We must release the entire fantastic world with one last breath.  We will all fall into the mystery. We are most alive at the threshold of loss and revelation.

— Francis Weller